@inbook {530, title = {Chapitre XIX - Phonologie de l{\textquoteright}{\'e}nonc{\'e}: Pr{\'e}liminaires}, booktitle = {Grande Grammaire du Fran{\c c}ais}, year = {Soumis}, chapter = {Chapitre 19: Phonologie de l{\textquoteright}{\'e}nonc{\'e}}, author = {{\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie}, editor = {Dani{\`e}le Godard and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Annie Delaveau} } @inbook {533, title = {L{\textquoteright}accentuation}, booktitle = {Grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {Soumis}, chapter = {{Chapitre 19: Phonologie de l{\textquoteright}{\'e}nonc{\'e}}, author = {{\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie and Di Cristo, Albert}, editor = {Dani{\`e}le Godard and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Annie Delaveau} } @inbook {6287, title = {La notion d{\textquoteright}usage dans une linguistique de corpus}, booktitle = {L{\textquoteright}usage de l{\textquoteright}usage}, year = {Soumis}, publisher = {ISTE}, organization = {ISTE}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e} and Juliette Thuilier}, editor = {B. Godart and Sandra Laugier} } @inbook {415, title = {Le type exclamatif}, booktitle = {Grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {Soumis}, author = {Jean-Marie Marandin and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard and Annie Delaveau} } @inbook {5208, title = {L{\textquoteright}infinitif}, booktitle = {Grande Grammaire du Fran{\c c}ais}, year = {Soumis}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, address = {Paris}, author = {Patrick Caudal}, editor = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Godard, Dani{\`e}le and Annie Delaveau} } @article {7373, title = {Voice mismatch and contrast in French Right-Node Raising}, journal = {Journal of Linguistics}, year = {2023}, url = {https://hal-cnrs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03924688}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Aoi Shiraishi and Barbara Hemforth} } @article {7483, title = {Voice mismatch and contrast in French RNR}, journal = {Journal of Linguistics}, year = {2023}, pages = {1-28}, abstract = {

Right-Node Raising is generally considered to impose stricter identity conditions than other kinds of ellipsis, such as VP ellipsis, according to Hankamer \& Sag 1976 and Hardt 1993. In this paper, we investigate voice mismatch in French Right-Node Raising (RNR) through a corpus study and two experiments. We show that RNR with voice mismatch can be found in a written corpus (frTenTen 2012) and that many examples involve coordination of a reflexive active and a short passive form. We suggest this is because semantic contrast (here, between self and external agent) plays a role according to Hartmann (2000) and Abeillé and Mouret (2010). We ran two acceptability judgement experiments to test voice mismatch and semantic contrast. We did not find any penalty for voice mismatch with VP ellipsis but an interaction with semantic contrast. We also found an effect of semantic contrast when coordinating an active and a passive VP without participle ellipsis. We conclude that voice mismatch is acceptable with RNR and propose a Head-driven Phrase-Structure Grammar (HPSG) ana- lysis, following Chaves (2014) and Shiraïshi et al. (2019).

}, keywords = {contrast, ellipsis, French, Passive, reflexive, Right-Node Raising, voice mismatch}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Aoi Shiraishi and Barbara Hemforth} } @article {7394, title = {Factivity and complementizer omission in English embedding gapping}, year = {2022}, pages = {1-38}, chapter = {1}, abstract = {

Taking as a starting point the variation in introspective judgments on embedded gapping in English in the literature, the main goal of this paper is to test the \‘No Embedding Constraint\’ experimentally. Building on a first experimental study designed to measure the interaction between that-omission and factivity in English embedded complement clauses, we conducted two experiments testing the role of the complementizer in embedded gapping, paying special attention to the semantic nature of the matrix predicates (non-factives vs. semi-factives vs. true factives). Our results show, on the one hand, that the \‘No Embedding Constraint\’ makes too strong claims that are not backed up by our experimental findings, and, on the other hand, that embedded gapping is affected by both the presence/absence of that and by the semantic class of the matrix predicate in English. In particular, embedded gapping seems to be more acceptable under non-factive verbs, especially in the absence of a complementizer. Both constraints (that-omission and factivity) can be accounted for by a constructionist fragment-based analysis, where the gapped clause is a non-finite phrase that has to address the same QUD (Question-Under-Discussion) as its source. This explains, in turn, why embedded gapping under true factive predicates is considered significantly less acceptable. We show that the acceptable cases of embedded gapping involve true syntactic embedding (so, the matrix clause has no parenthetical use). We conclude that English has the same sensitivity to the semantic class of the matrix predicate as other languages, but that the requirements on the presence/absence of that are English specific.

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226722000445}, author = {Gabriela B{\^\i}lb{\^\i}ie and Israel de la Fuente and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @article {7398, title = {L{\textquoteright}accord de proximit{\'e} en genre : quelques consid{\'e}rations diachroniques}, journal = {Discours}, volume = {31}, year = {2022}, abstract = {

Selon Moreau (2019), l\’accord au masculin était majoritaire en moyen français, en cas de coordination de noms de genres différents. Selon Abeillé et al. (2018), An et Abeillé (2021a), l\’accord au féminin est majoritaire pour le déterminant et l\’adjectif prénominal en français contemporain, si le premier nom est féminin. En examinant l\’évolution dans la base Frantext depuis 1550, nous montrons la persistance de l\’accord de proximité au féminin dans deux configurations : l\’accord du déterminant (certaines branches et problèmes) et celui de l\’adjectif épithète (les us et coutumes familiales). L\’accord au féminin est largement majoritaire pour le déterminant et l\’épithète prénominale, et remonte, en cas de nom féminin le plus proche, pour l\’épithète postnominale. Celui de l\’adjectif attribut(Son bec et ses jambes sont longues.) a en revanche quasiment disparu. Si l\’on considère que l\’accord de proximité peut se faire au féminin comme au masculin, les taux restent élevés et persistent pour l\’attribut.

}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and An Aixiu and Hu Yingqin} } @article {7393, title = {L{\textquoteright}alternance actif/passif en fran{\c c}ais parl{\'e} : un mod{\`e}le statistique}, journal = {Langue fran{\c c}aise}, volume = {216}, year = {2022}, pages = {63-80}, chapter = {63}, abstract = {

Cet article pr\ésente une \étude de l\’alternance actif/passif en fran\çais parl\é adoptant une approche quantitative, multifactorielle et probabiliste. Elle s\’appuie sur trois corpus oraux du projet Orf\éo (Debaisieux \& Benzitoun, 2020). Un \échantillon de 400 \énonc\és (200 actifs, 200 passifs) a \ét\é extrait, annot\é, puis analys\é par r\égression logistique \à effets mixtes. Un mod\èle pr\édictif de l\’alternance entre actif et passif est alors propos\é. Celui-ci permet de mettre en \évidence l\’effet de contraintes multiples sur le choix de construction\ : contraintes de longueur croissante des constituants, de codage harmonique des arguments, effets de s\émantique verbale et d\’amor\çage. Les facteurs en jeu en fran\çais parl\é se retrouvent \également en fran\çais \écrit journalistique (Da Cunha \& Abeill\é, 2020) et en anglais, sugg\érant une certaine unit\é de la construction \à travers les langues et les genres textuels. L\’\étude pointe enfin certaines diff\érences entre fran\çais parl\é et \écrit, montrant que les effets de d\éfinitude, pronominalit\é et longueur sont plus forts \à l\’oral.

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.3917/lf.216.0063}, author = {Da Cunha, Yanis and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inbook {7401, title = {La notion d{\textquoteright}usage en linguistique : du corpus {\`a} l{\textquoteright}exp{\'e}rimental}, booktitle = {Les usages de l{\textquoteright}usage}, year = {2022}, publisher = {ISTE}, organization = {ISTE}, edition = {B{\'e}atrce Godart, Sandra Laugier}, chapter = {11}, address = {London}, isbn = {9781784058197}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e} and Juliette Thuilier} } @article {7392, title = {Me too fragments in English and French: a direct interpretation approach}, journal = {The Linguistic review}, volume = {39}, year = {2022}, pages = {495-524}, chapter = {495}, abstract = {

Additive fragments, comprising a nominal remnant and an additive adverb (e.g.,\ too,\ either) are a particular type of stripping. On the basis of new corpus data in English and French, we show that such fragments do not always have a verbal clause as their antecedent, and that when they do, different kinds of mismatch are possible between a verbal equivalent and the actual fragment. This challenges most approaches based on syntactic reconstruction. We also show that their interpretation is more flexible than previously thought, since they can be used for interrogative, exclamatory, or ordering purposes. We distinguish between a contrastive (non-coreferent) use (A: John left. B: Me too.) and an emphatic (coreferent) one (A:\ John left. B: HIM too!),\ mostly in exclamations. We propose a direct interpretation analysis that resorts to no syntactic reconstruction of a verbal clause. The proposed analysis, couched upon construction-based HPSG,\ allows one to capture some common properties with other fragments (short answers and negative stripping) but also specific properties of additive fragments.

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2022-2095}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Kim Jong-Bok} } @booklet {edward:hal-03506525, title = {Acceptability of extractions out of adjuncts depends on discourse factors}, year = {2021}, note = {Poster}, month = {Mar}, url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03506525}, author = {Edward, Gibson and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel Elodie and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {7282, title = {Acceptability of extractions out of adjuncts depends on discourse factors}, year = {2021}, month = {03/2021}, author = {Edward, Gibson and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel Elodie and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @article {7397, title = {Closest conjunct agreement of attributive adjectives}, journal = {Journal of French language studies}, volume = {32}, year = {2021}, pages = {1-28}, chapter = {1}, abstract = {

Contrary to most French grammars claiming that French only allows masculine agreement when mixed-gender nouns are conjoined, we show that closest conjunct agreement (CCA) does exist in contemporary French, as in other Romance languages, and is the preferred strategy for prenominal adjectives. Using data from a large corpus (FrWac) and an acceptability rating experiment, we show that (feminine) CCA is well accepted in contemporary French, and should be distinguished from attraction errors, despite the norm prescribing masculine agreement. We also show the role of the adjective position, i.e. prenominal or post-nominal, and humanness. CCA is the preferred strategy for prenominal adjectives, and non-human nouns favour CCA for post- nominal adjectives. Assuming a hierarchical structure for coordination, the closest noun is the highest in A-N order, whereas it is the lowest in N-A order. Thus CCA in prenominal position may be favoured by a shorter structural distance. One can also see CCA with a prenominal adjective as \‘early\’ agreement. Regarding humanness, grammatical gender is interpreted as social gender with human nouns, and a masculine plural can refer to a mixed group. This \‘gender neutral\’ plural may favour masculine agreement for human nouns, or the prescriptive norm is more influential for human nouns.

}, doi = {doi:10.1017/S0959269521000193}, url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-french-language-studies/article/closest-conjunct-agreement-with-attributive-adjectives/1B2B93E1CC8926B034237A5CC6C42449}, author = {An Aixiu and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @article {7400, title = {The French question particles {\c c}a and donc: a corpus study}, journal = {Linguistic Research}, volume = {38}, year = {2021}, pages = {239-269}, chapter = {239}, abstract = {

We study two question particles (donc and \ça) in a large French corpus. We show that they are specialized for direct questions, and that wh-\ça is possible both in situ and in fronted position, contrary to previous literature (Cheng and Rooryck 2001). We also show that ellipsis is the most common use of wh-\ça, with sluicing (Ross 1969) and a new construction that we call wh-stripping, while fronting is the most common use of wh-donc. In many examples, a non-elliptical question would be impossible or quite different, which seem to cast doubt on a deletion under identity approach of sluices (Ross 1969) and to favor a Direct Interpretation approach (Ginzburg and Sag 2000).
Looking at the preceding context, in about half of wh-\ça and wh-donc sluices, the wh-word has a correlate, and in the majority of cases, the correlate is definite. We suggest that the particle \ça favors elliptical reprise requests, compared to bare wh-words, while the particle
donc favors biased questions.

}, url = {http://isli.khu.ac.kr/journal/content/data/38_2/3.pdf}, author = {Smirnova Anastasiia and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @article {7399, title = {French word order : the role of animacy}, journal = {Glossa: a journal of general linguistics}, volume = {6}, year = {2021}, pages = {1-55}, chapter = {1}, abstract = {

A major goal of the quantitative study of syntax has been to identify factors that have predictive power on speaker choices in the face of word-order or valence alternations (e.g. Arnold et al. 2000; Bresnan et al. 2007; Bresnan \& Ford 2010; Bader \& H\äussler 2010). In this paper, we study the role of animacy on the order of constituents in French. Animacy has been shown to affect sentence production in other languages, either directly (Feleki \& Branigan 1999; Kempen \& Harbusch 2004; Tanaka et al. 2011) or indirectly through grammatical role assignment (McDonald et al. 1993). Corpus studies however, have failed to find such an effect in French (Thuilier 2012a; Thuilier et al. 2014). Using a sentence recall task, we examined whether animacy has an impact on linear ordering or on grammatical function assignment. While we do find evidence for a role of animacy in the choice between active and passive voice, we do not find a preference to place animate arguments first with ditransitive verbs nor with nominal coordinations. While these findings tend to support the indirect hypothesis (McDonald et al. 1993; Kempen \& Harbusch 2004), we also find what may look like an anti-animacy effect: inanimate direct objects tend to precede animate indirect objects. We propose that canonical mappings between syntactic function and semantic role play a role in putting (inanimate theme) direct objects before (animate recipient) indirect objects, thus overriding the animacy first tendency in French.

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1155}, url = {https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/5435/}, author = {Juliette Thuilier and Grant, Margaret and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e} and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @book {7396, title = {Head-driven Phrase structure grammar: the handbook}, series = {Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology and Syntax }, year = {2021}, pages = {1500}, publisher = {Language Science Press}, organization = {Language Science Press}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-96110-255-6 }, doi = {DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5543318 }, author = {Stefan M{\"u}ller and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Robert Borsley and Jean-Pierre Koenig} } @inbook {7405, title = {Introduction}, booktitle = {la Grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, volume = {1}, year = {2021}, pages = {XXII-XL}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, chapter = {Introduction}, address = {Arles}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard and Annie Delaveau and Pascal Amsili and Gadet Fran{\c c}oise and Olivier Bonami} } @article {6772, title = {L{\textquoteright}accord sujet-verbe avec ou et ni}, journal = {Langages}, year = {2021}, author = {An Aixiu and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inbook {7404, title = {la coordination}, booktitle = {la Grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, volume = {2}, year = {2021}, pages = {1723-1840}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, chapter = {16}, address = {Arles}, author = {Fran{\c c}ois Mouret and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @book {7395, title = {La grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2021}, pages = {2600}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, address = {Arles}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard} } @inbook {7406, title = {La pr{\'e}position et le syntagme pr{\'e}positionnel}, booktitle = {la Grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, volume = {1}, year = {2021}, pages = {747-860}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, chapter = {7}, address = {Arles}, author = {Jesse Tseng and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Benjamin Fagard} } @inbook {delaisroussarie:halshs-00748394, title = {Le phras{\'e} des {\'e}nonc{\'e}s}, booktitle = {La grande Grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, volume = {GGF, volume 2}, year = {2021}, pages = {2091-2106}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, keywords = {groupes accentuels, Groupes intonatifs, Structure prosodique}, url = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00748394}, author = {{\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie}, editor = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Anne; Godard and Dani{\`e}le} } @inbook {abeille:hal-03277344, title = {Le verbe}, booktitle = {Grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2021}, url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03277344}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Olivier Bonami and Godard, Dani{\`e}le and Jean-Pierre Koenig and Anne Zribi-Hertz} } @inbook {7403, title = {le verbe}, booktitle = {la Grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, volume = {1}, year = {2021}, pages = {125-264}, chapter = {2}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Jean-Pierre Koenig} } @inbook {7402, title = {Les auxiliaires avoir et {\^e}tre}, booktitle = {la Grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, volume = {1}, year = {2021}, pages = {274-287}, publisher = {Actes sud}, organization = {Actes sud}, chapter = {3}, address = {Arles}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Cappeau Paul and Gadet Fran{\c c}oise} } @inbook {7407, title = {Les constructions verbales fusionn{\'e}es}, booktitle = {la Grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, volume = {1}, year = {2021}, pages = {265-364}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, chapter = {3}, address = {Arles}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Van Peteghem Marleen and Philip Miller and Jean-Pierre Koenig and R. Viv{\`e}s} } @inbook {1070, title = {Les interpr{\'e}tations de l{\textquoteright}article d{\'e}fini}, booktitle = {La Grande Grammaire du Fran{\c c}ais}, volume = {1}, year = {2021}, pages = {540-550}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, chapter = {3}, keywords = {anaphore, article d{\'e}fini, g{\'e}n{\'e}rique, locution verbale, pr{\'e}supposition, r{\'e}r{\'e}cence}, author = {Simatos, Isabelle and Claire Beyssade}, editor = {Dani{\`e}le Godard and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inbook {1069, title = {Les noms de parties du corps}, booktitle = {La Grande Grammaire du Fran{\c c}ais}, volume = {1}, year = {2021}, pages = {408-413}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, chapter = {3}, keywords = {definiteness, d{\'e}terminant, inalienable, noms, parties du corps}, author = {Simatos, Isabelle}, editor = {Dani{\`e}le Godard and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inbook {post:halshs-00748469, title = {L{\textquoteright}intonation}, booktitle = {La grande Grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, series = {GGF : la Grande Grammaire du Fran{\c c}aise}, volume = {volume}, number = {2}, year = {2021}, pages = {2141-2153}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, keywords = {contour m{\'e}lodique, Intonation}, url = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00748469}, author = {Post, Brechtje and {\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie}, editor = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Anne; Godard and Dani{\`e}le} } @inbook {crysmann:halshs-03091366, title = {Morphology}, booktitle = {Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. The Handbook}, series = {Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology and Syntax}, number = {9}, year = {2021}, pages = {947{\textendash}999}, publisher = {Language Science Press}, organization = {Language Science Press}, url = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03091366}, author = {Crysmann, Berthold}, editor = {Stefan M{\"u}ller and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Robert Borsley and Jean-Pierre Koenig} } @inbook {delaisroussarie:halshs-00748393, title = {Qu{\textquoteright}est-ce que la forme sonore des {\'e}nonc{\'e}s ?}, booktitle = {La grande Grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, series = {La Grande Grammaire du Fran{\c c}ais - GGF 2}, volume = {volume}, number = {2}, year = {2021}, pages = {2077-2090}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, keywords = {phon{\`e}me, phon{\'e}tique, phonologie, prosodie}, url = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00748393}, author = {{\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie}, editor = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Godard, Dani{\`e}le} } @article {6883, title = {Question particles {\c c}a and donc in French: A corpus study}, journal = {Linguistic Research}, volume = {38}, year = {2021}, pages = {239-269}, author = {Smirnova Anastasiia and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inbook {crysmann:halshs-03091369, title = {Unbounded Dependencies}, booktitle = {Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The handbook}, series = {Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology and Syntax}, number = {9}, year = {2021}, pages = {537-594}, publisher = {Language Science Press}, organization = {Language Science Press}, url = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03091369}, author = {Crysmann, Berthold and Robert Borsley}, editor = {Stefan M{\"u}ller and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Robert Borsley and Jean-Pierre Koenig} } @article {thuilierWordOrderFrench2021, title = {Word Order in {French: The Role of Animacy}, journal = {Glossa: a journal of general linguistics}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, year = {2021}, month = {apr}, publisher = {Open Library of Humanities}, abstract = {A major goal of the quantitative study of syntax has been to identify factors that have predictive power on speaker choices in the face of word-order or valence alternations (e.g. Arnold et al. 2000; Bresnan et al. 2007; Bresnan \& Ford 2010; Bader \& H{\"a}ussler 2010). In this paper, we study the role of animacy on the order of constituents in French. Animacy has been shown to affect sentence production in other languages, either directly (Feleki \& Branigan 1999; Kempen \& Harbusch 2004; Tanaka et al. 2011) or indirectly through grammatical role assignment (McDonald et al. 1993). Corpus studies however, have failed to find such an effect in French (Thuilier 2012a; Thuilier et al. 2014). Using a sentence recall task, we examined whether animacy has an impact on linear ordering or on grammatical function assignment. While we do find evidence for a role of animacy in the choice between active and passive voice, we do not find a preference to place animate arguments first with ditransitive verbs nor with nominal coordinations. While these findings tend to support the indirect hypothesis (McDonald et al. 1993; Kempen \& Harbusch 2004), we also find what may look like an anti-animacy effect: inanimate direct objects tend to precede animate indirect objects. We propose that canonical mappings between syntactic function and semantic role play a role in putting (inanimate theme) direct objects before (animate recipient) indirect objects, thus overriding the animacy first tendency in French.}, author = {Juliette Thuilier and Grant, Margaret and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e} and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {6679, title = {The acceptability of extractions from subjects depends on the discourse status of the subject}, year = {2020}, month = {09/2020}, address = {Postdam (Virtual Conference)}, url = {https://amlap2020.github.io/a/239.pdf}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel, Elodie and Gibson, Edward} } @book {6966, title = {Constraint-based Syntax and Semantics. Papers in Honor of Dani{\`e}le Godard}, year = {2020}, publisher = {CSLI Publications}, organization = {CSLI Publications}, address = {Stanford}, editor = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Olivier Bonami} } @article {6668, title = {Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction}, journal = {Cognition}, year = {2020}, abstract = {

In order to explain the unacceptability of certain long-distance dependencies - termed syntactic islands by Ross (1967) - syntacticians proposed constraints on long-distance dependencies which are universal and purely syntactic and thus not dependent on the meaning of the construction (Chomsky, 1977; Chomsky, 1995 a.o.). This predicts that these constraints should hold across constructions and languages. In this paper, we investigate the \"subject island\" constraint across constructions in English and French, a constraint that blocks extraction out of subjects. In particular, we compare extraction out of nominal subjects with extraction out of nominal objects, in relative clauses and wh-questions, using similar materials across constructions and languages. Contrary to the syntactic accounts, we find that unacceptable extractions from subjects involve (a) extraction in wh-questions (in both languages); or (b) preposition stranding (in English). But the extraction of a whole prepositional phrase from subjects in a relative clause, in both languages, is as good or better than a similar extraction from objects. Following Erteschik-Shir (1973) and Kuno (1987) among others, we propose a theory that takes into account the discourse status of the extracted element in the construction at hand: the extracted element is a focus (corresponding to new information) in wh-questions, but not in relative clauses. The focus status conflicts with the non-focal status of a subject (usually given or discourse-old). These results suggest that most previous discussions of islands may rely on the wrong premise that all extraction types behave alike. Once different extraction types are recognized as different constructions (Croft, 2001; Ginzburg \& Sag, 2000; Goldberg, 2006; Sag, 2010), with their own discourse functions, one can explain different extraction patterns depending on the construction.

}, doi = {10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104293}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel, Elodie and Gibson, Edward} } @article {6770, title = {French subject island: a discourse-based HPSG analysis}, journal = {Lingvisticae Investigationes}, volume = { 43}, year = {2020}, pages = {95-128}, author = {Winckel Elodie and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @article {6769, title = {French subject island ? empirical studies of dont and de qui.}, journal = {Journal of French language studies}, year = {2020}, pages = {1-26 }, url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-french-language-studies/article/french-subject-island-empirical-studies-of-dont-and-de-qui/945F4EB445675E6BE5D67AABC3556B0D}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Winckel Elodie} } @article {6771, title = {L{\textquoteright}alternance actif/passif en fran{\c c}ais : une {\'e}tude statistique sur corpus {\'e}crit}, journal = {Discours}, volume = {27}, year = {2020}, author = {Da Cunha, Yanis and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @article {6636, title = {Lessons from the English auxiliary system}, journal = {Journal of Linguistics}, volume = {56}, year = {2020}, pages = {87-155}, author = {Sag, Ivan and Chaves, Rui and Anne Abeill{\'e} and ESTIGARRIBIA, Bruno and Dan Flickinger and Kay, Paul} } @conference {6670, title = {The subject island as a case of focus-background conflict}, year = {2020}, month = {02/2020}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel, Elodie and Gibson, Edward} } @conference {6675, title = {Subject island: PP extraction depends on the construction}, year = {2020}, month = {03/2020}, address = {Amherst (MA) (Virtual Conference)}, url = {https://osf.io/ndtvw/}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel, Elodie and Gibson, Edward} } @conference {6672, title = {Subject NP island? A case of focus-background conflict. }, year = {2020}, month = {04/2020}, address = {MIT (Virtual Workshop)}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel, Elodie and Gibson, Edward} } @inproceedings {6782, title = {Extraction out of subject phrases in French: experimental evidence}, year = {2019}, month = {2019}, pages = {68-74}, edition = {Association for Computational Linguistics}, url = {https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-7908}, author = {Winckel, Elodie and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @article {6292, title = {Number agreement in French binomials}, journal = {Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics}, year = {2019}, issn = {1769-7158}, author = {Aixiu An and Anne Abeill{\'e}}, editor = {Christopher Pinon} } @article {6293, title = {Sluicing in Mauritian : a fragment-based approach}, journal = {Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics}, year = {2019}, issn = {1769-7158}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Shrita Hassamal}, editor = {Christopher Pinon} } @conference {6410, title = {Subject-island constraint? The discourse function of the construction matters}, year = {2019}, month = {09/2019}, address = {Moscou, Russie}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel, Elodie and Gibson, Edward} } @article {6638, title = {Un corpus annot{\'e} pour le fran{\c c}ais : le French Treebank}, journal = {TAL}, volume = {60}, year = {2019}, pages = {19-43}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Cl{\'e}ment, Lionel and Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois} } @article {6492, title = {Verbal mismatch in Right-Node Raising}, journal = {Glossa}, volume = {4}, year = {2019}, month = {10/2019}, pages = {1-26}, chapter = {1}, abstract = {

Right-Node Raising (RNR, Ross 1967; Chaves 2014) has been claimed to require phonological identity between the missing material and the shared element. Our corpus investigations provide examples of RNR with verb form mismatch with and without syncretism in English and French. Two acceptability experiments show that lack of phonological identity does not affect the acceptability of RNR. We argue further that RNR without phonological identity cannot be taken to be a case of cataphoric VP-ellipsis in French and that it should not be analyzed as such in English. As regards the status of RNR with verb form mismatch, two positions are available: either it is considered to be grammatical, in which case the phonological resolution principle of Pullum \& Zwicky (1986) does not hold, or it is considered to be ungrammatical but repaired (or \“recycled\”, Arregui et al. 2006; Frazier 2013). The high acceptability of cases with mismatch compared with ungrammatical controls casts doubt on the applicability of the recycling hypothesis in such cases. In order to account for the broader range of data established by our corpus and experimental results, we propose a new analysis of RNR based on lexeme identity rather than form identity.

}, issn = {E-ISSN: 2397-1835}, url = {https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/10.5334/gjgl.843/}, author = {Aoi Shiraishi and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Philip Miller} } @article {6774, title = {Why stripping in English : a corpus-based perspective}, journal = { Linguistic Research }, volume = {36}, year = {2019}, pages = {365-387}, author = {Kim Jong-Bok and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @article {6773, title = {Grammaire des adverbes en mauricien}, journal = {Faits de Langue}, volume = {49}, year = {2018}, author = {Shrita Hassamal and Anne Abeill{\'e}}, editor = {Fabiola Henri} } @article {6291, title = {L{\textquoteright}accord de proximit{\'e} du d{\'e}terminant en fran{\c c}ais}, journal = {Discours}, year = {2018}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Aixiu An and Aoi Shiraishi} } @inbook {5050, title = {Adjectives and adverbs in the grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, booktitle = {The interface of adjectives and adverbs in Romance }, year = {2017}, publisher = {J. Benjamins}, organization = {J. Benjamins}, edition = {M. Hummel, S. Valera}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Olivier Bonami and Dani{\`e}le Godard and M. Noailly} } @inproceedings {6290, title = {Agreement and interpretation of French binomials}, year = {2017}, pages = {26-43}, publisher = {CSLI Publications}, author = {Aixiu An and Anne Abeill{\'e}}, editor = {Stefan M{\"u}ller} } @conference {5847, title = {Subject island? (Counter)evidence from French dont-relative clauses}, year = {2017}, month = {03/2017}, abstract = {

Whether island constraints (Ross 1967) are due to structural (Chomsky 2008, Sprouse et al. 2015, etc.) or cognitive constraints (Klunder 1992, Hofmeister et al. 2013, etc.) is still an open debate. Subject islands have been shown to vary across languages (Rizzi 1990) and across constructions (Sprouse et al. 2015). In French, dont relative clauses (DRC) (Godard 1992) exhibit \‘de\’ (\‘of which\’) complement extraction for verbal (1a), object noun (1b) or subject noun (1c) complements. Mainstream generative approaches predict (1a) to be easier than (1b), and (1b) than (1c). Processing approaches such as DLT (Gibson, 2000) predict the reverse: (1c) should be easier than (1a), and (1a) than (1b), in terms of linear distance between dont and the gap. Furthermore, DLT predicts (2a), with a 1st person subject \‘je\’, to be easier than (1a) and (2b) than (1b).

  1. a. from VP une ville dont mes amis [parlent souvent _ ] (a town of-which my friends often talk )\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  b. from object NP une ville dont mes amis appr\écient [les commer\çants _ ] (a town of-which my friends like the \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  merchants)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  c. from subject NP une ville dont [les commer\çants _ ] vendent de l\’huile (a town of-which the merchants sell oil)

  1. a. from VP une ville dont je [parle souvent _ ] (a town of-which I talk often)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  b. from object NP une ville dont j\’appr\écie [les commer\çants _ ].

Corpus studies Using the written corpus French Treebank (Abeill\é et al, 2003), we found an overwhelming frequency of extraction out of NP subject (56,5\%) over verb extraction (19\%) and extraction out of NP object (12,5\%) in dont relative clauses. The spoken corpus CFPP2000 (Branca-Rosoff et al. 2012) confirms a high frequency of subject extraction (17,8\% of all dont; 63\% of all extractions out of NP). These subjects are not internal objects: looking at verbs for DRC with extraction out of subject, 67\% of the verbs in the spoken corpus and 47\% in the written corpus are transitive (unergative). Furthermore, almost all extractions out of object NP involve a pronominal subject. Linear mixed models also show that dont significantly tends to correspond to a verb complement with a pronominal subject rather than with a nominal subject (z=7,7; p\<.001).

Experiment 1 In an acceptability judgement task with 57 participants, we tested extraction out of subject and object NPs with pronominal and nominal subjects for the latter (1b/2b), adding control sentences with coordination (3x2 conditions; 30 items). The participants were asked to rate the sentences on a scale from 1 (bad) to 10 (good).

Extraction out of the subject was judged significantly better than extraction out of the object with a nominal subject NP (1b vs. 1c; p\<.05). Extraction out of object NP yielded a significant preference for pronominal over nominal subjects (1b vs. 2b; p\<.05). This confirms the results of our corpus studies.

Experiment 2 We ran an Eye-Tracking experiment with the same materials and 31 native French speakers. Total reading times of the verb region confirmed our previous results (controlling for verb length and frequency).

Conclusion The results of the two corpus studies and two experiments show that there is no extra cost of extracting out of a subject NP in DRC. This contradicts structural approaches to subject islands and confirm DLT predictions. The extra cost of a lexical subject when extracting out of an object NP (new discourse referent between dont and the gap) is confirmed as well.

Table 1: Examples of the materials for Experiment 1 and 2

A /\  Extraction from subject NP

They work in a practice of-which the neatness intimidates my parents every time.

Elles travaillent dans un cabinet dont la propret\é intimide mes parents \à chaque fois.

B /\  Extraction from object NP with a pronominal subject

They work in a practice of-which we admire the neatness every time.

Elles travaillent dans un cabinet dont nous admirons la propret\é \à chaque fois.

C / Extraction from object NP with a nominal subject

They work in a practice of-which my parents admire the neatness every time.

Elles travaillent dans un cabinet dont mes parents admirent la propret\é \à chaque fois.

D /\  Control sentence for A

They work in a practice and its neatness intimidates my parents every time.

Elles travaillent dans un cabinet et sa propret\é intimide mes parents \à chaque fois.

E /\  Control sentence for B

They work in a practice and we admire its neatness every time.

Elles travaillent dans un cabinet et nous admirons sa propret\é \à chaque fois.

F / Control sentence for C

They work in a practice and my parents admire its neatness every time.

Elles travaillent dans un cabinet et mes parents admirent sa propret\é \à chaque fois.
}, author = {Winckel, Elodie and Barbara Hemforth and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {4720, title = {French object relatives: all is good when the context is right}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, abstract = {

In experiments and corpus studies, we compared two types of French Object Relatives: with preverbal subject (le livre que Paul lit, \&$\#$39;the book that Paul reads\&$\#$39;) and with inverted subject (le livre que lit Paul). The linear distance hypothesis predicts the latter should be easier to process. However, in a Visual World experiment using reversible RCs with agentive verbs, we found the former to be easier.\ 
In a corpus study, we looked at general frequency of OR-types, verb semantics (+/- agentive), relative length of subject and verb in number of syllables, and the number of arguments in the OR. Logistic regressions show that the two ORs don\&$\#$39;t differ significantly in frequency, excluding a frequency-based explanation. Inverted ORs are actually preferred when the subject is longer, and the verb shorter with a non agentive meaning. Our findings showed that general frequency cannot be the factor explaining the use of the two ORs, but that verb semantics and length play a role. This means that the two ORs are not just alternatives but used in specific syntactic/semantic conditions. An acceptability judgement experiment confirmed that inverted ORs can be preferred over non-inverted ORs when the subject is longer and the verb non agentive.

}, author = {Pozniak, Celine and Barbara Hemforth and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {4710, title = {French object relatives: evidence against DLT but not entirely explained by frequency}, year = {2016}, month = {03/2016}, abstract = {

French object relatives: evidence against DLT but not entirely explained by frequency

C{\'e}line Pozniak, Barbara Hemforth \& Anne Abeill{\'e} (LLF, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Diderot, Labex EFL)

celine.pozniak@gmail.com

The literature in relative clause processing mainly presents differences between subject and object relative clauses (SRs and ORs). In our study, we will also compare two constructions for ORs: one with preverbal subject (ORsnoinv) and one with postverbal subject (ORsinv). Inversion is only possible with nominal subjects, not with pronominal subjects.

(1) OR with preverbal subject
Le m{\'e}decin que l\&$\#$39;avocat voit ___.

The doctor thatobj the lawyersubj sees.
Example (1) shows that the linear distance is shorter in ORsinv , so it should be easier to process than

ORsnoinv according to the Dependency Locality Theory, now DLT (Gibson, 2000).
Study 1 We designed an experiment to test linear distance-based theories in French in contexts with

high anticipation of restrictive relative clauses.
Experiment We ran a Visual World Eye-Tracking experiment (5 items per condition) with 32

native French speakers. We tested reversible SRs, ORsnoinv, ORsinv (1-3). The participants listened to a sentence while viewing 2 pictures with the same 3 characters each performing different actions. They had to find the correct picture according to the sentence. One picture was only compatible with an SR interpretation, the other one only with an OR interpretation.

Results Mixed linear models showed a significant SR advantage over the two ORs (ps\<.01). Participants looked at the right picture in later time windows for ORinv than for ORnoninv (ps\<.01), against linear distance accounts. These results seem, however, to go against the intuition that ORinv are relatively frequent in French, but possibly only under specific conditions.

Study 2 We therefore ran a corpus study using the French Treebank (Abeill{\'e} et al, 2003) to analyze factors for facilitating inverted and non-inverted RCs.

Corpus study We analyzed a corpus of the two ORs by looking at the semantics of the verb (+/- agentive), the length of the subject and the verb in number of syllables, and the number of arguments in the relative. We analyzed the role of these factors for the choice of the order in the relative using logistic regression models.

Results Logistic regressions show that the two ORs don\’t differ significantly in frequency, excluding a simple frequency-based explanation (94 ORsnoinv and 90 ORsinv). However, ORsinv are actually preferred over ORsnoinv when the subject is longer, and the verb is shorter and has a non agentive meaning (ps\< .01).

Conclusion In our Eye-Tracking experiment, ORsinv were harder to process than ORsnoinv, contradicting the DLT. However, the corpus study showed that general frequency cannot be the factor explaining this contrast. The verb semantics and the length of the subject and verb play a role in the choice of relative. This means that ORsnoinv and ORsinv are not just alternatives but used in specific contexts. The context in the experiment disfavored the use of ORsinv because of the use of agentive verbs. In the right context, ORsinv should even be preferred and acceptability judgment studies on this matter are currently on the way. Our results are highly compatible with semantic/pragmatic accounts in relative clause processing (Mak et al, 2006; Traxler et al, 2002).\ 

}, author = {Pozniak, Celine and Barbara Hemforth and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {5045, title = {Le comparatif de haut degr{\'e} : {\'e}tudes exp{\'e}rimentales en fran{\c c}ais et en mauricien}, year = {2016}, address = {University Paris 7, France}, author = {Shrita Hassamal and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {4714, title = {Les relatives en dont du fran{\c c}ais : {\'e}tudes empiriques}, volume = {27}, year = {2016}, abstract = {

R\ésum\é

Les relatives en\ dont\ ont fait l\’objet de plusieurs \études th\éoriques (Godard 1988) mais ont moins \ét\é \étudi\ées d\’un point de vue empirique (Gapany 2004). C. Blanche-Benveniste (1995) notait leur raret\é dans des corpus oraux, o\ù ils sont principalement compl\éments de certains verbes. Notre objectif est d\’observer le comportement des relatives en\ dont\ en fran\çais d\’un point de vue empirique. Pour ce faire, nous avons en premier lieu \étudi\é les relatives dans deux corpus, le French Treebank (corpus \écrit) et le Corpus de Fran\çais Parl\é Parisien des ann\ées 2000 (corpus oral). Ces \études nous ont permis de confirmer en partie les travaux de C. Blanche-Benveniste (1995) : l\’usage de\ dont\ en fran\çais \écrit diff\ère effectivement de son usage en fran\çais oral, mais\ dont\ est loin d\’\être r\éserv\é \à l\’oral \à quelques expressions fig\ées. Nous avons pu aussi confirmer l\’\étude de Godard (1980) : les dont compl\ément de nom (extractions hors de SN) ne sont pas marginaux, et les plus frequents sont ceux o\ù le nom est sujet, ce qui consid\ér\é comme agrammatical par certaines th\éories linguistiques comme agrammaticales. De ce point de vue, les corpus nous ont permis de v\érifier que les extractions hors du SN sujet ne posent pas de probl\èmes en fran\çais. Leur usage est m\ême plut\ôt r\épandu, et inclut les extractions hors de \« vrais sujets \» de verbes transitifs, contrairement aux pr\édictions des hypoth\èses de la grammaire g\én\érative. En grammaire g\én\érative en effet, les relatives comme les autres structures \à extraction sont soumises \à des contraintes d\’\îles (Ross 1957). Selon la contrainte de l\’\îlot nominal, il est plus difficile d\’extraire un compl\ément de nom qu\’un compl\ément de verbe. La contrainte de l\’\îlot sujet exclut quant \à elle l\’extraction du compl\ément du sujet, qui n\’est possible que lorsque le sujet est deriv\é (passif, moyen\…) ou argument interne (Chomsky 2008). Or, nous constatons que les extractions hors de SN sujet sont plus fr\équentes dans les corpus que les extractions hors de SN objet (en ce qui concerne les relatives en\ dont). Ce m\ême fait est un argument en faveur de la th\éorie de la localit\é de Gibson, qui pr\évoit que l\’extraction hors de SN sujet est non seulement bien form\ée mais moins co\ûteuse que celle hors de SN objet. D\’autres observations sur les relatives en\ dont\ des deux corpus semblent corroborer cette th\éorie, comme par exemple la plus grande fr\équence des sujets pronominaux ou invers\és dans les relatives en\ dont\ dans lesquelles\ dont\ correspond \à un compl\ément du verbe. Dans un deuxi\ème temps, nous avons men\é une \étude exp\érimentale de jugement d\’acceptabilit\é afin de comparer les jugements de locuteurs natifs face \à des relatives en\ dont\ correspondant \à une extraction hors du SN sujet d\’une part et \à une extraction hors de SN objet d\’autre part (la forme du sujet dans ces derni\ères, qui joue un r\ôle dans la th\éorie de la localit\é de Gibson, a \ét\é test\ée \également). Les r\ésultats de cette exp\érience sont eux aussi en accord avec les pr\évisions de la th\éorie de la localit\é de Gibson, les jugements \étant significativement sup\érieurs pour les extractions hors de SN sujet par rapport aux extractions hors de SN objet.

Abstract

French relative clauses introduced by\ dont\ (from now on:\ dont-RC) have been well investigated on the theoretical level (Godard 1988) but have not lead to many empirical studies (Gapany 2004). Blanche-Benveniste (1995) observed that\ dont-RC are not very common in spoken French and restricted to the extraction of a few verb complements. The aim of this article is to describe\ dont-RC on the basis of three empirical studies: two corpus studies and one online experimental study. The corpus studies have been conducted on a written corpus (French Treebank) and on a spoken corpus (Corpus de Fran\çais Parl\é Parisien des ann\ées 2000). The results confirm partly Blanche-Benveniste\’s claim: the written usage of\ dont-RC differs from its spoken use, but it is not restricted in the later to specific idioms. Both corpora corroborate the work of Godard (1980) : dont is widely used as a complement on noun, extractions out of NP are not marginal, not even out of subject NP which are considered non-grammatical by some linguistic theories. The corpus studies show that this kind of extraction is widely-used in French and even concern \“real subjects\” of transitive verbs, which goes against the prediction made by many generative theories. In generative grammar, relative clauses (as well as any extraction) are subject to island constraints (Ross 1957). The nominal island constraint predicts that the extraction of a noun complement should be harder than the extraction of a verb complement. The subject island constraint rules out extractions out of subject NPs, which is claimed to be only acceptable when the subject NP is an underlying object (Chomsky 2008). However, in our corpora,\ dont-RC extractions out of NP subject are more frequent than extractions out of NP object. This observation confirms Gibson\’s Dependency Locality Theory (DLT), which predicts that the extraction from subject NP should have less cognitive costs than the extraction from object NP. Other observations corroborate this theory as well: for example, that dont-RC corresponding to the extraction of the complement of a verb favor pronominal or inverted subjects. Our experimental study is an online acceptability task. Its aim is to compare the judgments from native speakers related to dont-RC implying an extraction out of subject NP and object NP (the kind of subject involved in the later case has an impact of the DLT\’s predictions and have been tested as well). The results confirm again the predictions from the DLT: the judgments for the extraction out of subject NPs are significantly higher than for the extraction out of object NPs.

}, doi = { http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162714011}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel, Elodie} } @inproceedings {6289, title = {Peripheral ellipsis and verb mismatch}, year = {2016}, pages = {662-680}, publisher = {CSLI Publications}, author = {Aoi Shiraishi and Anne Abeill{\'e}}, editor = {D. Arnold and Miriam Butt and Berthold Crysmann and T. King and Stefan M{\"u}ller} } @article {6288, title = {Syntactic mismatches in French peripheral ellipsis}, journal = {Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics}, year = {2016}, pages = {1-30}, issn = {1769-7158}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Berthold Crysmann and Aoi Shiraishi}, editor = {Christopher Pinon} } @conference {4726, title = {Voice mismatch in Right Node Raising: Evidence from acceptability judgments and an eyetracking reading experiment}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, abstract = {

Voice mismatches may arise in VP ellipsis and Pseudogapping between source and target. No such mismatch has been reported for Right Node Raising (RNR).
However, French corpora provide many examples, where the shared participle must be interpreted as active (reflexive) and passive. Since RNR requires semantic contrast between the conjuncts, we conducted two experiments to test semantic (agent) contrast and syntactic (voice) match:\ 
+contrast/-match: Ce pharmacien doit des explications \à ceux qui se sont *ou qui ont \ét\é* mobilis\és pour lui. / This pharmacist owes explanations to those who themselves have or who have been mobilized for him.\ 
-contrast/-match: qu\&$\#$39;on a *ou qui ont \ét\é* / who one has or who have been\ 
+contrast/+match: qui se sont *ou qu\&$\#$39;on a* / who themselves have or who one has\ 
-contrast/+match: qui \étaient *ou qui ont \ét\é* / who were or who have been\ 
Acceptability judgements only showed a significant effect of contrast (p\<.01), not of match. In an eyetracking reading experiment, Gaze and Regression Path Durations show significant effects of semantic contrast in both voice match and mismatch sentences (critical zone between *) and no effect of match. Hence, given the appropriate semantics, voice mismatch is acceptable in RNR.

}, author = {Aoi Shiraishi and Barbara Hemforth and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inbook {6639, title = {Ordering preferences for postverbal complements }, booktitle = {Ecological and Data-Driven Perspectives in French Language Studies}, year = {2015}, pages = {77-104}, edition = {Tyne Henri, Andr{\'e} Virgine, Benzitoun Christophe}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Juliette Thuilier and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e}} } @inbook {4895, title = {Ordering preferences for postverbal complements}, booktitle = {Ecological and Data-Driven Perspectives in French Language Studies}, year = {2015}, publisher = {Cambridge U P}, organization = {Cambridge U P}, edition = {Tyne}, author = {Juliette Thuilier and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e}} } @conference {5052, title = {Right peripheral ellipsis in French : a corpus study}, year = {2015}, address = {Hong-Kong}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Aoi Shiraishi} } @inproceedings {4897, title = {Syntactic mismatches in French peripheral ellipsis}, volume = {Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics}, year = {2015}, month = {2016}, pages = {1-30}, publisher = {CSSP}, edition = {Christopher Pi{\~n}{\'o}n}, address = {Paris}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Berthold Crysmann and Aoi Shiraishi} } @conference {4450, title = {Adjectives and adverbs in the grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2014}, month = {06/2014}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Graz}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {4451, title = {Coordination and ellipsis in natural language}, year = {2014}, month = {07/2014}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Vienne}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {4787, title = {Degree adverbs in Mauritian.}, year = {2014}, month = {2014}, pages = {pp. 259{\textendash}279}, publisher = {Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications}, edition = {In Stefan M{\"u}ller (Ed.)}, address = {University at Buffalo }, author = {Shrita Hassamal and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {5036, title = {Degree adverbs in Mauritian Creole}, year = {2014}, address = {University at Buffalo, New York, USA.}, author = {Shrita Hassamal and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {4449, title = {Discordances syntaxiques : la mise en facteur droite en fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2014}, month = {11/2014}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris-Diderot}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Aoi Shiraishi} } @article {4448, title = {Le fran{\c c}ais attend encore sa grande grammaire}, journal = {Pour la science}, year = {2014}, month = {01/2014}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard and Alain Kihm} } @inbook {thuilier:hal-01451705, title = {Ordering preferences for postverbal complements in French}, booktitle = {French through Corpora - Ecological and Data-Driven Perspectives in French Language Studies}, year = {2014}, month = {Jun}, publisher = {Cambridge Scholars Publishing}, organization = {Cambridge Scholars Publishing}, keywords = {animacy, caract{\`e}re anim{\'e}, caract{\`e}re d{\'e}fini, complexit{\'e} syntaxique, corpus linguistics, definiteness, exp{\'e}rience psycholinguistique, fran{\c c}ais, French, length, linguistique de corpus, logistic regression, longueur des constituant, mixed-effect model, mod{\`e}le {\`a} effets mixtes, mod{\'e}lisation statistique, ordre de mots, pronominalit{\'e}, pronominally, psycholinguistic experiment, questionnaire, r{\'e}gression logistique, syntactic complexity, syntactic weight, word order}, url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01451705}, author = {Juliette Thuilier and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e}}, editor = {Henry Tyne} } @inbook {998, title = {Questioning declaratives in question}, booktitle = {The core and the periphery. Data-Driven Perspectives on Syntax Inspired by Ivan A. Sag}, year = {2014}, publisher = {CSLI-Publications}, organization = {CSLI-Publications}, keywords = {OS-C}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard and Jean-Marie Marandin}, editor = {P. Hofmeister and E. Nordcliffe} } @booklet {grant:hal-01451838, title = {{The role of animacy in sentence production: Evidence from French}}, year = {2014}, note = {Poster}, publisher = {{Universit{\'e} Brock}}, keywords = {animacy, coordination, Ditransitive construction, French, Voice Alternation (active/passive), word order, Word Order Variations}, url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01451838}, author = {Grant, Margaret and Juliette Thuilier and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e} and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {grant:hal-01451790, title = {The role of conceptual accessibility on word order alternations in French: Evidence from sentence recall Complement order}, year = {2014}, note = {Poster}, month = {07/2014}, publisher = {{Universit{\'e} de Gen{\`e}ve}}, address = {Gen{\`e}ve}, keywords = {animacy, coordination, Ditransitive construction, French, Voice Alternation (active/passive), word order}, url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01451790}, author = {Grant, Margaret and Juliette Thuilier and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e} and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inbook {4447, title = {A Romance perspective on gapping constructions}, booktitle = {Romance perspectives on construction grammar}, year = {2014}, pages = {227-267}, publisher = {John Benjamins}, organization = {John Benjamins}, issn = {9789027204370}, doi = {10.1075/cal.15}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Gabriela B{\^\i}lb{\^\i}ie and Fran{\c c}ois Mouret and H. Boas and F. Gonzalvez Garcia} } @inproceedings {abeille:hal-00936493, title = {French Polar Questions : a corpus study}, year = {2013}, month = {Jul}, address = {Gen{\`e}ve, Switzerland}, url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00936493}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e} and Godard, Dani{\`e}le and Jean-Marie Marandin} } @inbook {4899, title = {French Questioning declaratives in question}, booktitle = {Hofmeister, Nordcliffe (eds), The core and the periphery, Data-Driven Perspectives on Syntax Inspired by Ivan A. Sag,}, year = {2013}, publisher = {CSLI Publications}, organization = {CSLI Publications}, address = {Stanford}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}}, editor = {Dani{\`e}le Godard} } @inbook {507, title = {La repr{\'e}sentation syntaxique des pr{\'e}positions faibles du berb{\`e}re de Chemini}, booktitle = {Pr{\'e}positions et postpositions - Approches typologiques et formelles.}, year = {2013}, publisher = {Herm{\`e}s Lavoisier}, organization = {Herm{\`e}s Lavoisier}, keywords = {OS-C}, author = {Sabrina Bendjaballah and Haiden, Martin}, editor = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard and Jesse Tseng} } @inproceedings {abeille:hal-00936490, title = {{Vers un treebank du fran{\c c}ais parl{\'e}}, year = {2013}, month = {Jun}, address = {Sables d{\textquoteright}Olonne, France}, keywords = {Corpus arbor{\'e}, corpus oral, fran{\c c}ais parl{\'e}, {analyse syntaxique automatique}, url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00936490}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e}} } @conference {5051, title = {Vers un treebank du fran{\c c}ais parl{\'e}}, year = {2013}, address = {Les Sables d{\textquoteright}Olonnes}, url = {http://www.taln2013.org/actes/www/T ALN-2013/}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e}} } @inproceedings {abeille:hal-00936496, title = {French questioning declaratives : a corpus study}, year = {2012}, month = {Sep}, address = {Paris, France}, url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00936496}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e} and Godard, Dani{\`e}le and Jean-Marie Marandin}, editor = {Sarah Brown-Schmidt and Jonathan Ginzburg and Staffan Larsson} } @conference {1286, title = {HPSG et la grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2012}, address = {Lyon}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @article {1053, title = {La grande grammaire du francais et le statut des donn{\'e}es}, journal = {Langue fran{\c c}aise}, year = {2012}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard and F. Gadet} } @booklet {thuilier:hal-01451725, title = {{Do animate arguments come first ?}}, howpublished = {2011}, year = {2011}, note = {Poster}, publisher = {{Barbara Hemforth, Saveria Colonna, Harry Tily, Manuel Gimenes}}, keywords = {animacy, French, word order}, url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01451725}, author = {Juliette Thuilier and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1067, title = {Do animate arguments come first ? the case of French ditransitive verbs}, year = {2011}, address = {Paris}, author = {Juliette Thuilier and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e}}, editor = {Barbara Hemforth} } @inproceedings {1283, title = {The French treebank : applications and extensions}, year = {2011}, address = {Stuttgart}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1284, title = {Le statut des donn{\'e}es dans la GGF}, year = {2011}, address = {Montpellier}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @article {646, title = {Les interrogatives compl{\'e}ments en fran{\c c}ais}, journal = {Cahiers de Lexicologie}, volume = {98}, year = {2011}, pages = {161-176}, chapter = {161}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard} } @inproceedings {1285, title = {Les traits dans une grammaire d{\textquoteright}unification}, year = {2011}, address = {Rabat}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1066, title = {Light verb constructions in the GGF}, year = {2011}, address = {Cyprus}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and R. Viv{\`e}s} } @inproceedings {1068, title = {Pr{\'e}f{\'e}rences concernant l{\textquoteright}ordre relatif des compl{\'e}ments du verbe en fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2011}, address = {Nancy}, author = {Juliette Thuilier and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e}} } @inproceedings {thuilier:halshs-01441248, title = {{Pr{\'e}f{\'e}rences concernant l{\textquoteright}ordre relatif des compl{\'e}ments du verbe en fran{\c c}ais}}, year = {2011}, address = {Nancy, Unknown or Invalid Region}, keywords = {Linguistics}, url = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01441248}, author = {Juliette Thuilier and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1065, title = {The Grande Grammaire du fran{\c c}ais project}, year = {2010}, address = {Malte}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard} } @inproceedings {1280, title = {Le corpus arbor{\'e} du fran{\c c}ais : construction et {\'e}volution}, year = {2010}, address = {LIPN, universit{\'e} Paris 13}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1282, title = {Les verbes supports dans la GGF}, year = {2010}, address = {K. U. Leuven}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @article {647, title = {Quelques contraintes s{\'e}mantiques et discursives sur les coordinations elliptiques}, journal = {Revue de s{\'e}mantique et de pragmatique}, year = {2010}, pages = {177-206}, chapter = {177}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Fran{\c c}ois Mouret} } @inproceedings {1281, title = {Une nouvelle grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2010}, address = {university of Mauritius}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inbook {1057, title = {Complex predicates in the Romance languages}, booktitle = {Fundamental issues in the Romance languages}, year = {2009}, pages = {107-170}, publisher = {CSLI Publications}, organization = {CSLI Publications}, address = {Stanford}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard}, editor = {Dani{\`e}le Godard} } @inproceedings {1279, title = {de FTAG {\`a} HPSG}, year = {2009}, address = {Marseille}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @article {648, title = {The dramatic extraction construction in French}, journal = {Bucarest working papers in linguistics}, volume = {X}, year = {2009}, pages = {135-148}, chapter = {135}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard and Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric Sabio} } @inproceedings {1276, title = {Formal grammar and French grammar}, year = {2009}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1277, title = {Formal grammars and descriptive grammars: the Grande Grammaire du fran{\c c}ais project}, year = {2009}, address = {Bordeaux}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1278, title = {La place de l{\textquoteright}oral dans la GGF}, year = {2009}, address = {universit{\'e} Rennes 2}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inbook {649, title = {La syntaxe des comparatives corr{\'e}latives}, booktitle = {Essais de Typologie et de Linguistique G{\'e}n{\'e}rale}, year = {2009}, pages = {349-360}, publisher = {Presses de l{\textquoteright}ENS}, organization = {Presses de l{\textquoteright}ENS}, address = {Lyon}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}}, editor = {Floricic, Franck} } @inproceedings {524, title = {Aspects prosodiques des constructions coordonn{\'e}es en fran{\c c}ais.}, year = {2008}, month = {06/2008}, address = {Avignon}, author = {Fran{\c c}ois Mouret and Anne Abeill{\'e} and {\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie and Jean-Marie Marandin and Hiyon Yoo} } @article {651, title = {Comparative correlatives and parameters}, journal = {Lingua}, year = {2008}, pages = {1139-1157}, chapter = {1139}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Robert Borsley} } @inproceedings {1064, title = {{Deux constructions {\`a} SN ant{\'e}pos{\'e}}, year = {2008}, pages = {2349-2364}, address = {Paris}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard and Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric Sabio} } @inproceedings {1273, title = {Dialoguons en HPSG}, year = {2008}, address = {Aix-en-Provence}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1063, title = {Enriching a subcat lexicon for French}, year = {2008}, address = {Ha{\"{\i}fa}, author = {A. Kupsc and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inbook {1056, title = {Growing Treelex}, booktitle = {Computational Linguistics and Intelligent text processing}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, year = {2008}, pages = {28-39}, publisher = {Springer Verlag}, organization = {Springer Verlag}, author = {A. Kupsc and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {Henri08a, title = {Information Structure Coding in Mauritian: Verum Focus expressed by Long Forms of Verbs}, year = {2008}, note = {

Paper presented at the Workshop on Predicate Focus, Verum Focus, Verb Focus

}, month = {November}, address = {Potsdam}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Fabiola Henri and Jean-Marie Marandin and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1287, title = {L{\textquoteright}ant{\'e}position de l{\textquoteright}objet}, year = {2008}, address = {Lyon}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard and Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric Sabio} } @inproceedings {1288, title = {L{\textquoteright}interpr{\'e}tation des coordinations elliptiques}, year = {2008}, address = {Bordeaux}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Fran{\c c}ois Mouret} } @inproceedings {1274, title = {Le projet de grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2008}, address = {Maison fran{\c c}aise d{\textquoteright}Oxford}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1442, title = {Left-aligned XPs in French: Evidence from Coordination}, year = {2008}, address = {Lisbonne}, author = {Fran{\c c}ois Mouret and Anne Abeill{\'e} and {\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie and Jean-Marie Marandin and Hiyon Yoo} } @inproceedings {454, title = {Long forms as Verum Focus exponents in Mauritian}, year = {2008}, month = {nov. 2008}, address = {Potsdam}, author = {Fabiola Henri and Jean-Marie Marandin and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1060, title = {Short and long verbal forms in Mauritian}, year = {2008}, pages = {378-398}, publisher = {CSLI Publications}, address = {Keihanna}, author = {Fabiola Henri and Anne Abeill{\'e}}, editor = {Stefan M{\"u}ller} } @inbook {650, title = {Tout, {\c c}a, quoi : remarques sur les mots l{\'e}gers en fran{\c c}ais}, booktitle = {Mod{\`e}les Syntaxiques}, year = {2008}, pages = {85-111}, publisher = {Peter Lang}, organization = {Peter Lang}, address = {Bruxelles}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}}, editor = {van Raemdonck, Dan} } @inproceedings {1062, title = {Treelex : a subcategorization lexicon automatically extracted from a French Treebank}, year = {2008}, address = {Hong Kong}, author = {A. Kupsc and Anne Abeill{\'e}}, editor = {{\'E}ric Villemonte De La Clergerie and P. Paroubek} } @inproceedings {1061, title = {Two types of preposed NP in French}, year = {2008}, pages = {306-324}, publisher = {CSLI on-line Publications}, address = {Keihanna}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard and Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric Sabio}, editor = {Stefan M{\"u}ller} } @inproceedings {1275, title = {Une nouvelle grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2008}, address = {Centre culturel fran{\c c}ais, Constantine}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {Henri08, title = {Verb Form Alternations in Mauritian}, year = {2008}, pages = {378{\textendash}398}, publisher = {CSLI Publications}, address = {Stanford}, keywords = {C-ACTI}, author = {Fabiola Henri and Anne Abeill{\'e}}, editor = {Stefan M{\"u}ller} } @inproceedings {1059, title = {Copulative sentences in Mauritian}, year = {2007}, pages = {130-149}, publisher = {CSLI Publications}, address = {Stanford}, author = {Fabiola Henri and Anne Abeill{\'e}}, editor = {Stefan M{\"u}ller} } @article {1052, title = {La Grande Grammaire du fran{\c c}ais : principes de construction}, journal = {Revue roumaine de linguistique}, volume = {LII}, year = {2007}, pages = {403-419}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Annie Delaveau and Dani{\`e}le Godard} } @inproceedings {1271, title = {Le projet de Grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2007}, address = {Bonifacio}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @book {1054, title = {Les grammaires d{\textquoteright}unification}, year = {2007}, pages = {344}, publisher = {Herm{\`e}s}, organization = {Herm{\`e}s}, address = {London}, keywords = {OS}, isbn = {978-2-7462-1251-0}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1270, title = {Les grammaires g{\'e}n{\'e}ratives: des arbres aux structures de traits typ{\'e}s}, year = {2007}, address = {Chicago Center, Paris}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {1272, title = {Les grammaires g{\'e}n{\'e}ratives: des grammaires formelles aux grammaires de contraintes}, year = {2007}, address = {universit{\'e} Paris 4}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inbook {1055, title = {Les relatives sans pronom relatif}, booktitle = {Le francais parl{\'e}, Normes et variations}, volume = {2}, year = {2007}, pages = {37-60.}, publisher = {L{\textquoteright}Harmattan}, organization = {L{\textquoteright}Harmattan}, address = {Paris}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard}, editor = {Micha{\"e}l Abecassis} } @inbook {6635, title = {Les relatives sans pronom relatif}, booktitle = {Le fran{\c c}ais parl{\'e} au 21{\`e}me si{\`e}cle: Normes et variations dans les discours et en interaction}, volume = {2}, year = {2007}, pages = {37-60}, publisher = {L{\textquoteright}Harmattan}, organization = {L{\textquoteright}Harmattan}, edition = {Micha{\"e}l ABECASSIS, Laure AYOSSO, Elodie VIALLETON}, address = {Paris}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Dani{\`e}le Godard} } @inproceedings {Henri07, title = {The syntax of copular constructions in Mauritian}, year = {2007}, pages = {130{\textendash}149}, publisher = {CSLI Publications}, address = {Stanford}, keywords = {C-ACTI}, author = {Fabiola Henri and Anne Abeill{\'e}}, editor = {Stefan M{\"u}ller} } @article {Abeille06b, title = {Les syntagmes nominaux fran{\c c}ais de la forme de-N{\textquoteright}}, journal = {Travaux de Linguistique}, volume = {50}, year = {2006}, pages = {79{\textendash}95}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Olivier Bonami and Godard, Dani{\`e}le and Jesse Tseng} } @inbook {Abeille06, title = {The syntax of French {\`a} and de: an HPSG analysis}, booktitle = {Dimensions of the Syntax and Semantics of Prepositions}, year = {2006}, pages = {147{\textendash}162}, publisher = {Springer}, organization = {Springer}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Olivier Bonami and Godard, Dani{\`e}le and Jesse Tseng}, editor = {Saint-Dizier, Patrick} } @conference {Abeille05, title = {L{\textquoteright}analyse syntaxique des SN de la forme N${\textquoteright}$}, year = {2005}, month = {January}, address = {Toulouse}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Olivier Bonami and Godard, Dani{\`e}le and Jesse Tseng} } @inproceedings {Abeille04, title = {The Syntax of French de-N{\textquoteright} Phrases}, year = {2004}, pages = {6{\textendash}26}, publisher = {CSLI Publications}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Olivier Bonami and Godard, Dani{\`e}le and Jesse Tseng}, editor = {Stefan M{\"u}ller} } @inproceedings {Abeille03c, title = {The syntax of French {\`a} and de: an HPSG analysis}, year = {2003}, pages = {133{\textendash}144}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Olivier Bonami and Dani{\`e}le Godard and Jesse Tseng} } @article {6637, title = {Why stripping in English : a corpus-based perspective}, journal = {Linguistic Research}, volume = {36}, year = {1999}, pages = {365-387}, author = {Kim, Jong-Bok and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inbook {5109, title = {Chapitre XIX - L{\textquoteright}intonation}, booktitle = {Grande Grammaire du Fran{\c c}ais}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, author = {Post, Brechtje and {\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie}, editor = {Dani{\`e}le Godard and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Annie Delaveau} } @inbook {5108, title = {Chapitre XIX - Structuration du flux de parole: constituants prosodiques et structure prosodique}, booktitle = {Grande Grammaire du Fran{\c c}ais}, publisher = {Actes Sud}, organization = {Actes Sud}, author = {{\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie}, editor = {Dani{\`e}le Godard and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Annie Delaveau} } @article {5046, title = {Les adverbes en mauricien}, journal = {Faits de Langues}, author = {Shrita Hassamal and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Fabiola Henri} }