@article {2885, title = {Cas et pr{\'e}positions en Lituanien}, journal = {Faits de Langues}, year = {2013}, pages = {147-175}, chapter = {147}, keywords = {cas pr{\'e}positions r{\'e}f{\'e}rence syntaxe s{\'e}mantique}, author = {H{\'e}l{\`e}ne de Penanros} } @article {2887, title = {{\textquoteright}Cause{\textquoteright} in question: about three ways of starving to death in Lithuanian}, journal = {Baltic Linguistics}, year = {2013}, pages = {159-186}, chapter = {159}, author = {H{\'e}l{\`e}ne de Penanros} } @article {2886, title = {{\v S}̌auti {\v s}autuvu or i{\v s} {\v s}autuvo? About two constructions of the instrument in Lithuanian}, journal = {Baltic Linguistics}, year = {2013}, pages = {133-157}, chapter = {133}, abstract = {

In Lithuanian, the instrument of verbs of shooting may be formulated in two different syntactic constructions: the instrumental case or the preposition i\š. These two constructions are often considered to be synonyms. A detailed study of numerous contexts where these constructions appear shows that they are not equivalent but correspond to two different representations of the event shooting: the instrumental case defines the process, providing it with qualita- tive determinations, whereas the preposition i\š constructs the exteriorization of the projectile. We will show that these hypotheses on the semantics of the instrumental case and of the preposition i\š permit one to account for the dif- ferent uses of the two constructions and for their differences in acceptability, should differences arise. This analysis is based on the Theory of Predicative and Enunciative Operations of A. Culioli. It argues for the thesis that grammar and lexicon are not to be dissociated.\ 

}, author = {H{\'e}l{\`e}ne de Penanros} } @inbook {3045, title = {{\v Z}emaite, Emilija Plateryte, Barbora Radvilaite }, booktitle = {Dictionnaire universel des cr{\'e}atrices}, year = {2013}, edition = {Edition des femmes}, author = {H{\'e}l{\`e}ne de Penanros} } @article {884, title = {Comment enseigner l{\textquoteright}accentuation lituanienne aux {\'e}trangers ?}, journal = {{\v Z}mogus ir {\v z}odis}, volume = {Tome XIV}, year = {2012}, month = {2012}, pages = {115}, chapter = {110}, address = {Vilnius}, issn = {1392-8600}, author = {H{\'e}l{\`e}ne de Penanros} } @article {883, title = {Comment enseigner la grammaire lituanienne aux fran{\c c}ais? Ou de l{\textquoteright}int{\'e}r{\^e}t de la morphophonologie}, journal = {{\v Z}mogus ir {\v z}odis}, volume = {Tome XII}, year = {2010}, month = {2010}, pages = {141-149}, chapter = {141}, address = {Vilnius}, issn = {1392-8600}, url = {http://www.biblioteka.vpu.lt/zmogusirzodis/didaktinelingvistika/20101.htm}, author = {H{\'e}l{\`e}ne de Penanros} } @inproceedings {886, title = {L{\textquoteright}accentuation en lituanien}, year = {2010}, address = {ENS}, author = {H{\'e}l{\`e}ne de Penanros} } @article {882, title = {La pr{\'e}fixation en lituanien: le cas de i{\v s}}, journal = {Faits de Langue {\textendash} Les Cahiers}, year = {2010}, pages = {105-137}, publisher = {Ophrys}, address = {Paris}, author = {H{\'e}l{\`e}ne de Penanros} } @booklet {885, title = {Le cas de i{\v s} en lituanien}, howpublished = {Journ{\'e}es eschatologies, les avatars de l{\textquoteright}indo-europ{\'e}en EKs-}, year = {2010}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot}, author = {H{\'e}l{\`e}ne de Penanros} } @inbook {3048, title = {Iconicity in question: the case of {\textquoteright}optional{\textquoteright} prepositions in Lithuanian}, booktitle = {Iconicity: East meets West}, number = {15}, edition = {John Benjamins publishing company}, author = {H{\'e}l{\`e}ne de Penanros} }