@article {noveck:hal-03494087,
	title = {Revealing pragmatic processes through a one-word answer: When the French reply Si},
	journal = {Journal of Memory and Language},
	volume = {120},
	year = {2021},
	month = {Oct},
	pages = {104245},
	publisher = {Elsevier},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jml.2021.104245},
	url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03494087},
	author = {Noveck, Ira and Petit, Nicolas and Ye Tian and Giuseppina Turco}
}
@article {7281,
	title = {Revealing pragmatic processes through a one-word answer: When the French reply Si},
	journal = {Journal of Memory and Language},
	volume = {120},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {104245},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jml.2021.104245},
	url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03494087},
	author = {Noveck, Ira and Petit, Nicolas and Ye Tian and Giuseppina Turco}
}
@article {7344,
	title = {Wh-Questions are understood before polar-questions: Evidence from English, German, and Chinese},
	journal = {Journal of Child Language},
	volume = {48},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {157{\textendash}183},
	author = {Moradlou, Sara and Zheng, Xiaobei and Ye Tian and Jonathan Ginzburg}
}
@article {7343,
	title = {Laughter as language},
	journal = {Glossa: a journal of general linguistics},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {1{\textendash}51 year=2020},
	author = {Jonathan Ginzburg and Chiara Mazzocconi and Ye Tian}
}
@article {7345,
	title = {What{\textquoteright}s your laughter doing there? A taxonomy of the pragmatic functions of laughter},
	journal = {IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing},
	year = {2020},
	author = {Chiara Mazzocconi and Ye Tian and Jonathan Ginzburg}
}
@inproceedings {7362,
	title = {{\textquotedblleft}No, I AM{\textquotedblright}: What are you saying {\textquotedblleft}no{\textquotedblright} to?},
	volume = {21},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {1241{\textendash}1252},
	author = {Ye Tian and Jonathan Ginzburg}
}
@inproceedings {7360,
	title = {Towards KoS/TTR-based proof-theoretic dialogue management},
	year = {2018},
	address = {Aix-en-Provence},
	author = {Vladislav Maraev and Jonathan Ginzburg and Staffan Larsson and Ye Tian and Jean-Philippe Bernardy},
	editor = {Lauren Prevot and Magali Ochs and Benoit Fabre}
}
@article {7365,
	title = {Self Addressed Questions and Filled Pauses: A Cross-linguistic Investigation},
	journal = {Journal of psycholinguistic research},
	volume = {46},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {905{\textendash}922},
	author = {Ye Tian and Maruyama, Takehiko and Jonathan Ginzburg}
}
@inproceedings {5823,
	title = {"No I Am": What are you saying "No" to?},
	year = {2016},
	address = {Edimbourg},
	abstract = {<p>The English particle \&ldquo;no\&rdquo; can be used in a variety of contexts. We propose that \&ldquo;no\&rdquo; is three ways ambiguous, distinguished by the type of antecedent utilized: explicit, implicit and exophoric. The second type\&mdash;\&ldquo;no\&rdquo; with an implicit antecedent addresses a grounding misalignment caused by sources such as speaker\&rsquo;s bias. This type of \&ldquo;no\&rdquo; cannot be used bare. The current semantic theories on \&ldquo;no\&rdquo; as an answer particle to negative polar questions and assertions claim that \&ldquo;no\&rdquo; is ambiguous between confirming and rejecting the polar question or assertion. The preceding negative polar question or assertion licenses and therefore provides the content for \&ldquo;no\&rdquo; in answers like \&ldquo;No, I AM\&rdquo;. We argue instead that the ambiguity arises from whether \&ldquo;no\&rdquo; is picking an an explicit antecedent\&mdash;the queried proposition\&mdash;or an implicit one\&mdash;the questioner\&rsquo;s bias. We offer three predictions and show that even positive antecedents with implied bias may license the \&ldquo;No, I AM\&rdquo; type of answer; in dialogue, bare \&ldquo;no\&rdquo;s only pick up explicit antecedents; the strength of the bias in a negative question influences the rate of the second type of \&ldquo;no\&rdquo; uses. We formalize our account in the KoS framework (Ginzburg, 2012). Our analysis highlights the importance of potential mismatches between the information states of different conversational participants in meaning resolution.</p>
},
	keywords = {dialogue, KoS, negation, No, non-sentential utterance, polarity particle},
	author = {Ye Tian and Jonathan Ginzburg}
}
@article {5826,
	title = {Self Addressed Questions and Filled Pauses: A cross-linguistic investigation},
	journal = {Journal of Psycholinguistic Research},
	year = {2016},
	month = {12/2016},
	pages = {1-18},
	abstract = {<p>There is an ongoing debate whether phenomena of disfluency (such as filled pauses) are produced communicatively. Clark and Fox Tree (Cognition 84(1):73\&ndash;111, 2002) propose that filled pauses are words, and that different forms signal different lengths of delay. This paper evaluates this Filler-As-Words hypothesis by analyzing the distribution of self-addressed-questions or SAQs (such as \&ldquo;what\&rsquo;s the word\&rdquo;) in relation to filled pauses. We found that SAQs address different problems in different languages (most frequently about memory-retrieval in English and Chinese, and about appropriateness in Japanese). In relation to filled pauses, British but not American English uses \&ldquo;um\&rdquo; to signal a more severe problem than \&ldquo;uh\&rdquo;. Chinese uses different filled pauses to signal the syntactic category of the problem constituent. Japanese uses different filled pauses to signal levels of interaction with the interlocuter. Overall, our data supports the Filler-As-Words hypothesis that filled pauses are used communicatively. However, the dimensions of its meanings vary across languages and dialects.</p>
},
	keywords = {Cross-linguistic analysis, Disfluency, Filled pauses, Self addressed questions},
	issn = {1573-6555},
	doi = {10.1007/s10936-016-9468-5},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9468-5},
	author = {Ye Tian and Maruyama, Takehiko and Jonathan Ginzburg}
}
@conference {5642,
	title = {Time alignment between laughter and laughable},
	year = {2016},
	month = {09/2016},
	address = {Centre for Language Technology, University of Copenhagen},
	author = {Chiara Mazzocconi and Ye Tian and Jonathan Ginzburg}
}
@conference {5640,
	title = {Towards a Multi-layered Analysis of Laughter},
	year = {2016},
	month = {07/2016},
	publisher = {Rutgers University},
	address = {New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA},
	author = {Chiara Mazzocconi and Ye Tian and Jonathan Ginzburg}
}
@inproceedings {5641,
	title = {When do we laugh?},
	year = {2016},
	month = {09/2016},
	address = {Los Angeles, USA},
	author = {Ye Tian and Chiara Mazzocconi and Jonathan Ginzburg}
}
@inproceedings {6309,
	title = {Editing Phrases},
	year = {2015},
	address = {Gothenburg Sweden},
	author = {Ye Tian and Claire Beyssade and Yvette Yannick Mathieu and Jonathan Ginzburg}
}
@inproceedings {4809,
	title = {The Disfluency, Exclamation and Laughter in Dialogue (DUEL) Project},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {176{\textendash}178},
	author = {Jonathan Ginzburg and Ye Tian and Pascal Amsili and Claire Beyssade and Barbara Hemforth and Yvette Yannick Mathieu and Saillard, Claire and Julian Hough and Kousidis, Spyridon and David Schlangen}
}
