@inproceedings {celle:hal-03452674,
	title = {Negative bias in questions in TED talks},
	year = {2021},
	month = {Oct},
	pages = {https://underline.io/lecture/36149-negative-bias-in-questions-in-ted-talks},
	publisher = {Caliendo Giuditta and Lemmens Maarten and Lesuisse M{\'e}gane},
	address = {Lille, France},
	keywords = {anticipation, bias, expectation, expressivity, questions},
	doi = {10.48448/jkre-p757},
	url = {https://hal-univ-paris.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03452674},
	author = {Celle, Agn{\`e}s and Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois}
}
@article {6191,
	title = {Position du syntagme Wh- en fran{\c c}ais : r{\'e}elle optionnalit{\'e} ou biais sociolinguistique ?},
	journal = {ELIS - {\'E}changes Linguistiques en Sorbonne, Universit{\'e} Paris Sorbonne},
	year = {2018},
	month = {06/2018},
	pages = {64-91},
	abstract = {French optionality with regards to the realization of Wh-phrases in interrogative clauses is a well known phenomenon, with the Wh-phrase in situ or fronted. Native speakers{\textquoteright} preference for the in situ position in spontaneous informal production, mostly oral, has already been established. Two new experiments show a perceptive bias in written form in native speakers, who either stigmatize this position or prefer the more formal fronted construction with verb-subject inversion. This bias, of socio-linguistic origin, must be considered when creating and analyzing experiments related to interrogative clauses of French.},
	keywords = {bias, experimental linguistics, French, fronted, in situ, optionality, partial interrogatives, preference, sociolinguistics, Wh-phrases},
	url = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01802590},
	author = {Thiberge, Gabriel}
}
