@inproceedings {Ritz2008July,
	title = {On the evolution of the Australian Present Perfect: perfective uses in evidential contexts},
	year = {2008},
	month = {July},
	address = {University of Sydney},
	author = {Ritz, Marie-Eve and Patrick Caudal}
}
@inproceedings {5210,
	title = {Event Structure vs. Stage Structure and Abstract Aspectual Relations},
	year = {2000},
	month = {2000},
	pages = {361-372},
	publisher = {Berkeley Linguistics Society},
	address = {Berkeley},
	abstract = {<p>Introduction v Currently dominant neo-davidsonian view on aspect calculus has driven many to study event structure in terms of mereological, part-of relationships ; it will be argued here that this approach is not appropriate for theoretical \&amp; empirical reasons (cf. Asher (1993) \&amp; Verkuyl (1993) for related positions, on philosophical grounds); v An alternative approach based on discourse-like relations will be proposed. Main features : Explicit relations between situations, sub-situations (or situation stages) and aspectual viewpoints ; Empirical evidence in a variety of languages suggesting indeed that event types / event structure (= situation structure / eventuality structure) should be regarded as a language-specific issue. 2 Preliminary definitions : some basic aspectual concepts 2.1 Defining situation structure and lexical aspect</p>
},
	author = {Patrick Caudal and Roussarie, Laurent}
}
