@inbook {7407,
	title = {Les constructions verbales fusionn{\'e}es},
	booktitle = {la Grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais},
	volume = {1},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {265-364},
	publisher = {Actes Sud},
	organization = {Actes Sud},
	chapter = {3},
	address = {Arles},
	author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Van Peteghem Marleen and Philip Miller and Jean-Pierre Koenig and R. Viv{\`e}s}
}
@conference {6673,
	title = {Acceptability of VP ellipsis: discourse conditions vs. syntactic identity},
	year = {2020},
	month = {03/2020},
	address = {Amherst (MA) (Virtual Conference)},
	url = {https://people.umass.edu/bwdillon/CUNY_2020_Abstracts/A66_Final_Manuscript.pdf},
	author = {Philip Miller and Barbara Hemforth}
}
@article {6669,
	title = {The Effect of Semantic and Discourse Features on the Use of Null and Overt Subjects - A Quantitative Study of Third Person Subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. },
	journal = {DELTA: Documenta{\c c}{\~a}o de Estudos em Ling{\"u}{\'\i}stica Te{\'o}rica e Aplicada,},
	volume = {36},
	year = {2020},
	doi = {https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-460x2020360107},
	author = {Eduardo Correa Soares and Philip Miller and Barbara Hemforth}
}
@inproceedings {6690,
	title = {Missing antecedents found},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {822{\textendash}834},
	publisher = {Linguistic Society of America},
	edition = {LSA},
	address = {New Orleans},
	doi = { https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v5i1.4795	},
	author = {Philip Miller and Barbara Hemforth and Pascal Amsili and Gabriel Flambard}
}
@conference {6671,
	title = {Unacceptable VPE with identical antecedents: Disentangling the effects of discourse conditions and mismatch on the acceptability of Verb Phrase Ellipsis},
	year = {2020},
	month = {02/2020},
	address = {T{\"u}bingen},
	author = {Philip Miller and Barbara Hemforth}
}
@conference {6412,
	title = {Discourse conditions on Verb Phrase Ellipsis and the question of syntactic identity: new evidence from acceptability experiments},
	year = {2019},
	month = {09/2019},
	address = {Moscou, Russie},
	author = {Philip Miller and Barbara Hemforth}
}
@article {6409,
	title = {The effect of verbal agreement marking on the use of null and overt subjects: a quantitative study of first person singular in Brazilian Portuguese},
	journal = {F{\'o}rum Lingu{\'\i}stico},
	volume = {16},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {3579-3600},
	chapter = {3579},
	abstract = {<p>In a corpus study and two acceptability experiments, we investigated whether there is a preference for null or overt subjects with ambiguous (syncretic) and exclusive (unambiguous) verbs in Brazilian Portuguese (BP). Previous literature has proposed that BP (i) is deactivating the \&ldquo;Avoid Pronoun Principle\&rdquo; and (ii) is a partially pro-drop language, whose morphosyntactic contexts for null subjects are restricted. The corpus study and the acceptability experiments show that there is an effect of person syncretism in the verbal paradigm on the relative frequency of null subjects and on the acceptability of sentences with null subjects in the first-person singular: there is a tendency to avoid ambiguity due to null subjects with ambiguous verb forms, but only in contexts with competing antecedents. These results are analyzed in the light of a general theory of anaphora resolution (ARIEL, 1990, etc.), as resulting from a calculation taking into account the accessibility of potential antecedents and the cost of the anaphoric form (ALMOR, 1996).</p>
},
	issn = {ISSNe 1984-8412},
	doi = { },
	url = {https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/forum/article/view/1984-8412.2019v16n1p3579},
	author = {Eduardo Correa Soares and Philip Miller and Barbara Hemforth}
}
@inbook {7358,
	title = {Ellipsis in HPSG},
	booktitle = {The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {75{\textendash}121},
	publisher = {Oxford University Press},
	organization = {Oxford University Press},
	address = {New York},
	author = {Jonathan Ginzburg and Philip Miller},
	editor = {Jeroen van Craenenbroeck and Tanja Temmerman}
}
@article {6492,
	title = {Verbal mismatch in Right-Node Raising},
	journal = {Glossa},
	volume = {4},
	year = {2019},
	month = {10/2019},
	pages = {1-26},
	chapter = {1},
	abstract = {<p>Right-Node Raising (RNR, Ross 1967; Chaves 2014) has been claimed to require phonological identity between the missing material and the shared element. Our corpus investigations provide examples of RNR with verb form mismatch with and without syncretism in English and French. Two acceptability experiments show that lack of phonological identity does not affect the acceptability of RNR. We argue further that RNR without phonological identity cannot be taken to be a case of cataphoric VP-ellipsis in French and that it should not be analyzed as such in English. As regards the status of RNR with verb form mismatch, two positions are available: either it is considered to be grammatical, in which case the phonological resolution principle of Pullum \&amp; Zwicky (1986) does not hold, or it is considered to be ungrammatical but repaired (or \&ldquo;recycled\&rdquo;, Arregui et al. 2006; Frazier 2013). The high acceptability of cases with mismatch compared with ungrammatical controls casts doubt on the applicability of the recycling hypothesis in such cases. In order to account for the broader range of data established by our corpus and experimental results, we propose a new analysis of RNR based on lexeme identity rather than form identity.</p>
},
	issn = {E-ISSN: 2397-1835},
	url = {https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/10.5334/gjgl.843/},
	author = {Aoi Shiraishi and Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Philip Miller}
}
@conference {4437,
	title = {VP Ellipsis beyond syntactic identity: the case of nominal antecedents},
	year = {2014},
	address = {T{\"u}bingen},
	doi = {10.13140/2.1.4713.2488},
	author = {Philip Miller and Barbara Hemforth}
}
