@inbook {7460, title = {Wearing Its Logical Form on Its Sleeve: Syntactically Covert A-movement and Overt Extraction Morphology in the Derivation of Coptic Wh-in situ Questions }, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Move \& Agree Conference}, number = {Language Faculty and Beyond}, year = {Sous presse}, pages = {1-57}, publisher = {John Benjamins}, organization = {John Benjamins}, address = {AmsterdamPhiladelphia}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @article {7237, title = {When irony is faster than its literal control: The role of mindreading during irony comprehension}, journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory \& Cognition}, year = {2023}, publisher = {APA}, type = {Journal Article}, author = {Camilo R. Ronderos and Tomlinson, Jack and Noveck, Ira} } @article {6648, title = {Whatever his arguments, whatever relatives are headed relatives. A reply to Caponigro{\textquoteright}s reply}, journal = {Linguist Inquiry}, volume = {53}, year = {2022}, pages = {522{\textendash}550}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00413}, author = {Caterina Donati and Foppolo, F. and Konrad, I. and Cecchetto, C.} } @article {7235, title = {When eleven does not equal 11: Investigating exactness at a number{\textquoteright}s upper bound}, journal = {Plos one}, number = {17(4)}, year = {2022}, pages = {e0266920-e0266920}, type = {Journal publication}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266920}, url = {https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266920}, author = {Noveck, Ira and Foegel, Martial and Van Voorhees, Kira and Giuseppina Turco} } @article {7553, title = {When eleven does not equal 11: Investigating exactness at a number{\textquoteright}s upper bound}, journal = {Plos one}, year = {2022}, pages = {e0266920-e0266920}, type = {Journal publication}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266920}, url = {https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266920}, author = {Noveck, Ira and Foegel, Martial and Van Voorhees, Kira and Giuseppina Turco} } @article {7205, title = {Wh-features and exclamatives in LIS (Italian Sign Language)}, journal = {Revista de Estudos Lingu{\'\i}sticos da Universidade do Porto}, year = {2022}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.21747/978-989-9082-02-1/ling}, author = {Checchetto, A. and Cecchetto, C. and Caterina Donati} } @inproceedings {7375, title = {A word-and-paradigm workflow for fieldwork annotation}, volume = {Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on the Use of Computational Methods in the Study of Endangered Languages}, year = {2022}, publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics}, address = {Dublin, Ireland}, abstract = {

There are many challenges in morphological fieldwork annotation: it heavily relies on segmentation and feature labeling (which have both practical and theoretical drawbacks), it\’s time-intensive, and the annotator needs to be linguistically trained and may still annotate things inconsistently. We propose a workflow that relies on unsupervised and active learning grounded in Word-and-Paradigm morphology (WP). Machine learning has the potential to greatly accelerate the annotation process and allow a human annotator to focus on problematic cases, while the WP approach makes for an annotation system that is word-based and relational, removing the need to make decisions about feature labeling and segmentation early in the process and allowing speakers of the language of interest to participate more actively, since linguistic training is not necessary. We present a proof-of-concept for the first step of the workflow: in a realistic fieldwork setting, annotators can process hundreds of forms per hour.

}, author = {Copot, Maria and Court, Sara and Diewald, Noah and Antetomaso, Stephanie and Elsner, Micha} } @article {7344, title = {Wh-Questions are understood before polar-questions: Evidence from English, German, and Chinese}, journal = {Journal of Child Language}, volume = {48}, year = {2021}, pages = {157{\textendash}183}, author = {Moradlou, Sara and Zheng, Xiaobei and Ye Tian and Jonathan Ginzburg} } @article {thuilierWordOrderFrench2021, title = {Word Order in {French: The Role of Animacy}, journal = {Glossa: a journal of general linguistics}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, year = {2021}, month = {apr}, publisher = {Open Library of Humanities}, abstract = {A major goal of the quantitative study of syntax has been to identify factors that have predictive power on speaker choices in the face of word-order or valence alternations (e.g. Arnold et al. 2000; Bresnan et al. 2007; Bresnan \& Ford 2010; Bader \& H{\"a}ussler 2010). In this paper, we study the role of animacy on the order of constituents in French. Animacy has been shown to affect sentence production in other languages, either directly (Feleki \& Branigan 1999; Kempen \& Harbusch 2004; Tanaka et al. 2011) or indirectly through grammatical role assignment (McDonald et al. 1993). Corpus studies however, have failed to find such an effect in French (Thuilier 2012a; Thuilier et al. 2014). Using a sentence recall task, we examined whether animacy has an impact on linear ordering or on grammatical function assignment. While we do find evidence for a role of animacy in the choice between active and passive voice, we do not find a preference to place animate arguments first with ditransitive verbs nor with nominal coordinations. While these findings tend to support the indirect hypothesis (McDonald et al. 1993; Kempen \& Harbusch 2004), we also find what may look like an anti-animacy effect: inanimate direct objects tend to precede animate indirect objects. We propose that canonical mappings between syntactic function and semantic role play a role in putting (inanimate theme) direct objects before (animate recipient) indirect objects, thus overriding the animacy first tendency in French.}, author = {Juliette Thuilier and Grant, Margaret and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e} and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {mickus_what_2020, title = {What Meaning-Form Correlation Has to Compose With: A Study of MFC on Artificial and Natural Language}, year = {2020}, pages = {3737{\textendash}3749}, publisher = {International Committee on Computational Linguistics}, address = {Barcelona, Spain (Online)}, url = {https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.coling-main.333}, author = {Timothee Mickus and Bernard, Timoth{\'e}e and Denis Paperno} } @article {7345, title = {What{\textquoteright}s your laughter doing there? A taxonomy of the pragmatic functions of laughter}, journal = {IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing}, year = {2020}, author = {Chiara Mazzocconi and Ye Tian and Jonathan Ginzburg} } @inproceedings {6563, title = {Walk-denoting music: Refining music semantics}, year = {2019}, author = {Migotti, L{\'e}o and Zaradzki, L{\'e}o} } @inbook {6158, title = {When all linguists did not go to the workshop, none of the Germans but some of the French did: The role of alternative constructions for quantifier scope}, booktitle = {Grammatical Approaches to Language Processing Essays in Honor of Lyn Frazier}, volume = {SITP 48}, year = {2019}, pages = {167-185}, publisher = {Springer}, organization = {Springer}, edition = {Katy Carlson, Charles Clifton jr., \& Janet Dean Fodor}, address = {Dordrecht}, abstract = {

In this paper, we will present crosslinguistic data on the interpretation of negation over quantifier scope in sentences like \“All children did not go to the zoo.\” Questionnaire data show that English as well as German speakers prefer a linear scope interpretation of the quantifier and the negation, where it is true for all children that they did not go to the zoo. French speakers, however, strongly prefer the inverse scope interpretation where some but not all children did not go to the zoo. The preference for linear scope is moreover stronger for German speakers than for English speakers. It diminishes with age for French and English, but not for German speakers. We will argue that language differences result from two constraints: the availability of a \“close\” alternative in the language and the topicality of a preverbal subject. An unambiguous alternative corresponding to inverse scope in the \“all-not\” construction can easily be achieved in English and German by fronting the negation as in \“Not all children went to the zoo\”. The corresponding construction is not available in standard French.\ \ A second questionnaire study shows that adding \“Not\…all\” sentences in the experiment, thus increasing their availability, increases the linear scope preference in English. The particularly strong preference for linear scope in German will be argued to be linked to the stronger topicality of preverbal subjects in German main clauses.\ 

}, author = {Barbara Hemforth and Lars Konieczny} } @article {ridouane:hal-02369162, title = {Why is gemination contrast prevalently binary? Insights from Moroccan Arabic}, journal = {Radical: A journal of Phonology}, year = {2019}, publisher = {Laboratoire Lig{\'e}rien de Linguistique UMR 7270}, url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02369162}, author = {Ridouane, Rachid and Giuseppina Turco} } @article {6774, title = {Why stripping in English : a corpus-based perspective}, journal = { Linguistic Research }, volume = {36}, year = {2019}, pages = {365-387}, author = {Kim Jong-Bok and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {6279, title = {Workshop {\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}Spoken Language : Tools and Workflow for Creating and Editing Data and Metadata{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}}, year = {2018}, address = {Tokyo, Japan}, url = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01955707}, author = {Etienne, Carole and Parisse, Christophe and Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois} } @conference {6225, title = {When segmentation helps. Implicative structure and morph boundaries in the Navajo verb}, year = {2017}, month = {December}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Lille}, author = {Sacha Beniamine and Olivier Bonami and Joyce McDonough} } @inbook {DeClercqWyngaerd2017, title = {Why Affixal Negation is Syntactic}, booktitle = {Proceedings of WCCFL 34}, year = {2017}, pages = {151-158}, publisher = {Cascadilla Press}, organization = {Cascadilla Press}, address = {Sommerville, MA}, author = {Karen De Clercq and Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido}, editor = {Aaron Kaplan and Abby Kaplan and Miranda McCarvel and Edward Rubin} } @inbook {4694, title = {What you see is what you get: Chinese sentence-final particles as head-final complementisers}, booktitle = {Discourse Particles {\textendash} Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics}, series = {Linguistische Arbeiten}, number = {564}, year = {2016}, pages = {49-77}, publisher = {De Gruyter Mouton}, organization = {De Gruyter Mouton}, edition = {Josef Bayer and Volker Struckmeier}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {978-3-11-049715-1}, doi = {10.1515/9783110497151-003}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan and Paul, Waltraud} } @inproceedings {5641, title = {When do we laugh?}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, address = {Los Angeles, USA}, author = {Ye Tian and Chiara Mazzocconi and Jonathan Ginzburg} } @inproceedings {5225, title = {Why are distributive readings dispreferred}, volume = {Going Romance 2015}, year = {2016}, author = {Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin and Emilia Ellsiepen and Barbara Hemforth} } @article {4560, title = {Why Chinese SFPs are neither optional nor disjunctors}, journal = {Lingua}, volume = {170}, year = {2016}, month = {01/2016}, pages = {23-34}, chapter = {23}, abstract = {

In a recent paper,\ Biberauer et al. (2014b)\ claim that the Chinese sentence-final particles (SFPs)\ ne\ and\ ma\ only \“double\” the information encoded elsewhere in the sentence and are to be analyzed as \“acategorial\” conjunctions. This contrasts with the current analysis of, e.g.\ ma\ as an interrogative force head. The present article provides evidence in favour of the SFPs\ ma\ and\ ne\ as C-elements and challenges some of the preconceived ideas commonly encountered in the literature. Within the head-final split CP proposed for Chinese \‘Low C\ \<\ Force\ \<\ Attitude\’,\ ma\ instantiates a Force head, whereas\ ne\ realizes the discourse-related AttitudeP, not a\ wh-question typing particle (paceLisa L.-S. Cheng\&$\#$39;s, 1991). Furthermore, evidence is provided to show that the surface sentence-final position of SFPs in Chinese must be taken at face value.

}, keywords = {Mandarin Chinese; Sentence-final particles (SFPs); Head-final split CP; Yes/no questions; Final over Final Constraint (FOFC)}, issn = {0024-3841}, doi = {10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.005}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan and Paul, Waltraud} } @inbook {5222, title = {Weak Reference and Semantic Incorporation}, booktitle = {The Syntax and Semantics of Pseudo-Incorporation}, volume = {Syntax \& Semantics 40}, year = {2015}, publisher = {Brill}, organization = {Brill}, address = {Leiden}, author = {Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin and Ion Giurgea}, editor = {Olga Borik and Berit Gehrke} } @conference {4732, title = {What lies at the bottom of morphological oceans?}, year = {2015}, month = {December 2015}, address = {Universit{\'e} Jean Jaur{\`e}s Toulouse}, author = {Fradin, Bernard} } @inproceedings {5141, title = {What motivates extra-rising patterns in L2 French: Acquisition factors or L1 Transfer ?}, year = {2015}, month = {08/2015}, address = {Glasgow}, author = {Fabi{\'a}n Santiago Vargas and {\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie} } @conference {4480, title = {Wh-ex-situ and Information Structure in Chinese}, year = {2015}, address = {CRLAO, INALCO}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {4091, title = {Wh-ex-situ and the Left Periphery in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2014}, month = {04/2014}, address = {Rome, Italie}, keywords = {left periphery, Mandarin Chinese, wh-ex-situ}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @article {4344, title = {Wh-ex-situ in Mandarin Chinese: Mapping Between Information Structure and Split CP}, journal = {Linguistic Analysis}, volume = {39}, year = {2014}, month = {04/2015}, pages = {413}, chapter = {371}, abstract = {

This paper examines the so-called wh-ex-situ phenomenon in Mandarin Chinese. It shows that there are four different types of wh-ex-situ in the left-periphery of Mandarin: Type I: extracted wh-topic, Type II: extracted wh-focus, Type III: base-generated wh-topic and Type IV: base-generated wh-focus. This differs from preceding accounts which analyze all ex-situ wh-phrases either as topics (cf. Tang 1988, Wu 1999) or as foci (cf. Cheung 2008, 2014). These four types display different syntactic and semantic properties. While wh-topics (extracted and base-generated) must be D-linked and obey locality constraints as well as the \“episodic eventuality\” constraint (cf. Zhang 2002), ex-situ wh-foci do not. However, the four types all satisfy general semantic constraints on interrogatives. Within the split-CP architecture in Chinese, ex-situ wh-topics and ex-situ wh-foci occupy different positions, TopP being higher than FocP.\ 

}, keywords = {cleft focus, left periphery, Mandarin Chinese, topicalization, wh-ex-situ}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {4465, title = {Why are distributive readings dispreferred?}, year = {2014}, month = {10/2014}, address = {Lisbonne}, abstract = {

}, url = {http://www.fcsh.unl.pt/linguistica/goingromance2014/GR_Prog.pdf}, author = {Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin and Emilia Ellsiepen and Barbara Hemforth} } @inproceedings {5164, title = {What explains the Distribution and Form of non-final rising Contours in French as an L2 ?}, year = {2013}, month = {05/2013}, publisher = {Concordia University}, address = {Montr{\'e}al}, author = {Fabi{\'a}n Santiago Vargas and {\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie} } @article {4912, title = {WH-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS)}, journal = {Sign Language and Linguistics}, volume = {16}, year = {2013}, pages = {157-188}, chapter = {157}, author = {Chiara Branchini and Cardinaletti Anna and Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati and Carlo Geraci} } @inproceedings {pradet:cea-00932340, title = {{WoNeF : am{\'e}lioration, extension et {\'e}valuation d{\textquoteright}une traduction fran{\c c}aise automatique de WordNet}}, year = {2013}, month = {Jun}, pages = {76-89}, address = {Les Sables d{\textquoteright}Olonne, France}, keywords = {d{\'e}sambigu{\"\i}sation lexicale, ressource, traduction, WordNet}, url = {https://hal-cea.archives-ouvertes.fr/cea-00932340}, author = {Pradet, Quentin and Baguenier Desormeaux, Jeanne and de Chalendar, Ga{\"e}l and Danlos, Laurence} } @article {seddah:hal-00940224, title = {A Word Clustering Approach to Domain Adaptation: Robust parsing of source and target domains}, journal = {Journal of Logic and Computation}, year = {2013}, publisher = {{Oxford University Press (OUP)}}, keywords = {biomedical, Out of domain and morphologically-rich languages statistical parsing, self training, treebanking, unsupervized word clustering data driven lemmatization}, doi = {10.1093/logcom/exs082}, url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00940224}, author = {Seddah, Djam{\'e} and Marie Candito and Henestroza Anguiano, Enrique and Anguiano Enrique, Henestroza} } @article {4752, title = {What but-sentences argue for: a modern argumentative analysis of {\textquoteright}but{\textquoteright}}, journal = {Lingua}, volume = {122}, year = {2012}, pages = {1864{\textendash}1885}, author = {Gr{\'e}goire Winterstein} } @conference {873, title = {When wh-questions interact with information structure}, year = {2012}, month = {03/2012}, address = {Frankfurt, Allemagne, 7-9 March}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @book {Bonami12bx, title = {Word Structure 5.1: Stems in inflection and lexeme formation}, year = {2012}, publisher = {Edinburgh University Press}, organization = {Edinburgh University Press}, address = {Edinburgh}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/word.2012.0016}, editor = {Olivier Bonami} } @inproceedings {hanoka:hal-00701606, title = {{Wordnet creation and extension made simple: A multilingual lexicon-based approach using wiki resources}}, year = {2012}, month = {May}, pages = {6}, address = {Istanbul, Turkey}, keywords = {Wiki resources, Word Sense Disambiguation, WordNet}, url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00701606}, author = {Hanoka, Val{\'e}rie and Beno{\^\i}t Sagot} } @inproceedings {walther11mmm, title = {When endoclitics account for structure in morphology : a Sorani Kurdish case study}, year = {2011}, note = {

Communication au Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM8). 15-17 septembre 2011. Cagliari, Italie

}, month = {09/2011}, type = {Communication}, address = {Cagliari, Italie.}, abstract = {

http://web.me.com/gwalther/homepage/Publications_(fr)_files/MMM2011abstract.pdf

}, keywords = {Clitics, Morphology, Sorani Kurdish, Structure}, author = {G{\'e}raldine Walther} } @inproceedings {5371, title = {WinPitch, a multipurpose multimodal tool for speech analysis of very large scale corpora}, year = {2011}, month = {01/2011}, author = {Philippe Martin} } @inproceedings {candito:hal-00659577, title = {{A Word Clustering Approach to Domain Adaptation: Effective Parsing of Biomedical Texts}}, year = {2011}, month = {Oct}, address = {Dublin, Ireland}, keywords = {biomedical texts, domain adaptation, statistical parsing}, url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00659577}, author = {Marie Candito and Henestroza Anguiano, Enrique and Seddah, Djam{\'e}} } @booklet {825, title = {Weak Indefinites : From Properties to Amounts}, howpublished = {Workshop NIAS}, year = {2010}, keywords = {table ronde th{\'e}matique}, author = {Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin} } @inproceedings {tribout10, title = {What semantic content for a Lexeme-Formation Rule? The case of noun to verb conversion in French}, year = {2010}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Delphine Tribout} } @article {933, title = {When small is many in the event domain}, journal = {Lexis}, volume = {6}, year = {2010}, pages = {41{\textendash}58}, author = {Lucia M. Tovena} } @conference {896, title = {Wh-ex-situ : Mapping Between Information Structure and Split CP}, year = {2010}, address = {City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @inproceedings {866, title = {Word order and information structuring}, year = {2010}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris 3-Sorbonne}, author = {Marie-Claude Paris} } @conference {897, title = {Wh-fronting in Chinese}, year = {2009}, address = {CRLAO, EHESS, Paris, France}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @article {935, title = {On ways of repeating}, journal = {Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes}, volume = {37}, year = {2008}, note = {

Thematic issue: Tovena L. (ed.) \em Aspect et pluralit\é d\&$\#$39;\év\énements

}, pages = {85{\textendash}112}, author = {Lucia M. Tovena and Donazzan, Marta} } @conference {878, title = {Wh-in-situ et questions rh{\'e}torique en chinois mandarin}, year = {2008}, address = {Paris, France}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {Bonami06d, title = {What is realized by realizational morphology?}, year = {2006}, month = {August}, address = {Newcastle}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Gilles Boy{\'e}} } @conference {1048, title = {Wh-topicalization and wh-in-situ in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2006}, address = {CRLAO, EHESS, Paris, France}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @inbook {7548, title = {Working out languages: An interactionist analysis of vitality issues for Taiwanese Austronesian languages}, booktitle = {Streams Converging into an Ocean: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Paul Jen-Kuei Li on His 70th Birthday}, volume = {W5}, number = {Language and Linguistics Monograph Series}, year = {2006}, publisher = {Academia Sinica}, organization = {Academia Sinica}, address = {Taipei}, abstract = {

Claire Saillard

UFR Linguistique

Universit\é Paris 7, France

Working out languages:

An interactionist analysis of vitality issues for Taiwanese Austronesian languages

Abstract

This article presents the results of a field research in interactionist sociolinguistics conducted in Hualien. Through the description of multilingual strategies in face-to-face interactions between Austronesian language speakers and their co-workers in two given professional settings, the research aimed to answer the question of vitality of Austronesian languages in a multiethnic society like Taiwan. It was found that, although the workplaces investigated were favorable to the use of Austronesian languages both for professional and extra-professional purposes, Austronesian languages were not the preferred choice of the Aborigine workers. The prevalence of standard Chinese was made quite clear whenever the speakers mastered this language sufficiently. Other non-official languages, such as Japanese and Minnan Chinese, were found to fulfill some unexpected social functions. An investigation of language attitudes as indicated by the names given to Austronesian languages corroborated the feeling of linguistic insecurity exhibited by the Aborigine speakers\’ language choices. The article ends with some perspectives on the future of Taiwanese Austronesian languages in a changing society.

Keywords : Interactionist sociolinguistics, Taiwanese Austronesian languages, language choice, language vitality, functions of languages.

}, isbn = {978-986-00-6784-2}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {1051, title = {Wh-in-situ in Mandarin Chinese : an alternative view}, year = {2005}, address = {l{\textquoteright}Universit{\'e} de Leiden, Leiden, Pays bas.}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan and Boucher, Paul} } @inbook {5433, title = {WinPitch Corpus: Presentation and user{\textquoteright}s manual }, booktitle = {C-ORAL-ROM, Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages}, year = {2005}, publisher = {benjamins}, organization = {benjamins}, address = {London}, author = {Philippe Martin} } @article {5434, title = {WinPitch LTL, a Multimodal Pronunciation Software }, journal = {Revue de l{\textquoteright}ALSIC}, volume = {8}, year = {2005}, author = {Philippe Martin} } @article {5318, title = {WinPitch LTL, un logiciel multim{\'e}dia d{\textquoteright}enseignement de la prosodie}, journal = {Revue de l{\textquoteright}ALSIC}, volume = {8}, year = {2005}, pages = {95-108}, author = {Philippe Martin} } @inproceedings {5447, title = {WinPitch Corpus, a Text to Speech Alignment Tool for Large Multimodal Corpora }, year = {2004}, month = {05/2004}, author = {Philippe Martin} } @inproceedings {5446, title = {WinPitch LTL II, a multimodal pronunciation software }, year = {2004}, month = {06/2004}, pages = {177-182}, author = {Philippe Martin} } @inproceedings {5436, title = {WinPitchPro, a text to speech alignment and acoustic analysis for large corpora }, year = {2004}, month = {05/2004}, author = {Philippe Martin} } @inproceedings {5368, title = {WinPitchPro, a Tool for Text to Speech Alignment and Prosodic Analysis}, year = {2004}, month = {03/2004}, author = {Philippe Martin} } @inproceedings {5449, title = {WinPitch Corpus, a software tool for alignment and analysis of large corpora }, year = {2003}, month = {02/2003}, author = {Philippe Martin} } @inproceedings {5448, title = {WinPitch Corpus, a Software Tool for Alignment and Analysis of Large Corpora }, year = {2003}, month = {07/2003}, author = {Philippe Martin} } @inproceedings {5450, title = {WinPitch 2000: a tool for experimental phonology and intonation research }, year = {2000}, month = {10/2000}, author = {Philippe Martin} } @article {6637, title = {Why stripping in English : a corpus-based perspective}, journal = {Linguistic Research}, volume = {36}, year = {1999}, pages = {365-387}, author = {Kim, Jong-Bok and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @inproceedings {5329, title = {WinPitch Language Teaching and Learning : Ecouter, voir et manipuler la production orale pour l{\textquoteright}apprentissage en langue seconde }, year = {1999}, pages = {110-113}, author = {Aline Germain and Philippe Martin} } @conference {5328, title = {WinPitch Language Teaching, Easy Learning (LTEL) }, year = {1998}, month = {12/1998}, author = {Aline Germain and Philippe Martin} } @inproceedings {5364, title = {WinPitch : un logiciel d{\textquoteright}analyse temps r{\'e}el de la fr{\'e}quence fondamentale fonctionnant sous Windows }, year = {1996}, month = {05/1996}, pages = {224=227}, author = {Philippe Martin} } @article {6641, title = {Whatever his arguments, whatever relatives are headed relatives. A reply to Caponigro{\textquoteright}s reply.}, journal = {Linguistic Inquiry}, author = {Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati} } @article {6622, title = {Whatever his arguments, whatever relatives are headed relatives. A reply to Caponigro{\textquoteright}s reply}, journal = {Linguistic Inquiry}, abstract = {

This is a reply to Caponigro 2019, which argues that the phrase structure theory proposed by Donati and Cecchetto (2011;2015) falls short of accounting for the attested patterns of free relative clauses. The core of that paper is a criticism concerning the reliability of the data that were taken as evidence for D\&C\’s analysis of ever-relatives as not being free relatives. This paper reports the results of 5 controlled experiments on English and Italian involving about 200 participants, focusing on five main properties that set apart free relatives from full relatives (occurrence with a complementizer and with a relative pronoun, infinitival use, absolute use, adverbial use). Crucially, ever-relatives do not pattern with free relatives in any of these five domains, either in Italian or in English. This clearly shows that ever-relatives are not a counterexample against D\&C\’s phrase structure theory. Another potential counterexample, Romanian free relatives, is also discussed.

}, keywords = {free relatives; full relatives; ever-relatives; labeling}, author = {Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati} }