@article {7453, title = {Dative Possessive Sentences in Early Egyptian }, journal = {Uppsala Studies in Egyptology}, year = {Soumis}, pages = {1-30}, type = {research article}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @article {7456, title = {Direct and Indirect Modification Adjectives in Coptic Attributive Constructions }, journal = {Zeitschrift der Deutsch-Morgenl{\"a}ndischen Gesellschaft {\textendash} Supplementa}, year = {Soumis}, type = {research article}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @article {7454, title = {Syntactically Covert A-movement and Lower Copy Pronunciation: Evidence from Coptic wh-in-situ interrogation }, journal = {Journal of Historical Syntax}, year = {Soumis}, type = {research article}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @article {7193, title = {Polarity focus in a cross-dialectal grammar of Coptic Egyptian}, journal = {Quaderni di lavoro ASIt}, year = {Sous presse}, author = {De Clercq, Karen and Chris Reintges} } @article {7452, title = {Polarity Focus in Coptic Egyptian }, journal = {Quaderni di Lavoro dell{\textquoteright}Atlante Sintattico d{\textquoteright}Italia (ASIt): Festschrift Cecilia Poletto}, year = {Sous presse}, month = {02/2023}, pages = {1-}, type = {research article}, chapter = {1}, author = {Chris Reintges and Karen De Clercq} } @article {7451, title = {Bendjaballah, Sabrina and Chris Reintges (2021) Nominal Gender in Coptic Egyptian: Typology and Morphological Analysis. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r {\"A}gyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 148(1): 31{\textendash}49. https://doi.org/10.1515/zaes-2021-0106 }, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r {\"A}gyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde}, volume = {148}, year = {2021}, month = {2021}, pages = {31-49}, type = {research article}, chapter = {31}, author = {Chris Reintges and Sabrina Bendjaballah} } @article {7450, title = {Reintges, C.H. (2019) Review article d{\textquoteright}{\'E}. Mathieu \& R. Truswell ({\'e}ds.) (2017) Micro-change and Macro-change in Diachronic Syntax. Language ;95(2): 380{\textendash}383. doi:10.1353/lan.2019.0037. }, journal = {Language }, volume = {95}, year = {2019}, month = {2019}, pages = {380-383}, type = {Review article}, chapter = {380}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @article {5523, title = {Analytical Challenges of the Earlier Egyptian Passive Voice and Related Constructions}, journal = {Lingua Aegyptia}, volume = {23}, year = {2016}, month = {2016}, pages = {289-386}, type = {review article}, chapter = {289}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @article {5521, title = {Syntactic Conditions on Special Inflection: Evidence from Hausa and Coptic Egyptian}, journal = {Lingua}, volume = {166}, year = {2015}, month = {2015}, pages = {127-148}, type = {research article}, abstract = {
This comparative study examines the morphosyntactic parameters
governing the distribution of special inflection in constituent interrogatives and focus constructions in Hausa and Coptic Egyptian. In theselanguages,relative
\’tense-aspect-mood (TAM) markers occur in relativeclauses, constituent interrogatives and declarative focus constructions. However, special inflection is not a clause-typing device but is governed by syntactic conditions, since both languages also have focus/wh-constructionslacking relativeTAMs: both
languages allow in situ and ex situ focus/wh-constructions, but while Hausa
special inflection occurs in ex situ constructions, Coptic special inflection occurs in insitu constructions.A transformational copy theory analysis reduces
the parametric differences between Hausa and Coptic to different pronunciation sites of the displaced focus/wh-phrase: either the top
copy in its displaced position in the specifier of Focus Phrase (FP),
or the lower copy in its thematic position.An additional parameter
reminiscent of the Doubly-filled COMP Filter is set for Hausa to
allow both specifier and head of FP to be spelt out (pronounced)
at once, resulting in the coincidence of fronting and special inflection,
while the same parameter in Coptic is set to prohibit both\  the head\  and
the specifier of FP spelling out at once, ruling out the coincidence
of special inflection\  and fronting.
}, author = {Chris Reintges and Green, Melanie} } @article {1081, title = {A historical syntax of asyndetic and syndetic relatives clauses}, journal = {Journal of Coptic Studies}, volume = {15}, year = {2013}, month = {2013}, pages = {127-148}, publisher = {Peeters}, type = {research article}, chapter = {127}, address = {Louvain}, keywords = {CH-OS}, author = {Chris Reintges}, editor = {R. Boutros} } @article {5524, title = {The Morpho-Syntax of Alternating Complementizers in Coptic Relative Clause Constructions}, journal = {Folia Orientalia}, volume = {49}, year = {2012}, pages = {395-419}, type = {research article}, chapter = {395}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @article {1074, title = {The evolution of the Ancient Egyptian Stative: Diachronic stability despite inflectional change}, journal = {Folia Orientalia}, volume = {48}, year = {2011}, pages = {7-97}, issn = {ISSN 0015-5675}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @article {reintges_high_2011, title = {High analyticity and Coptic particle syntax: A phase-based approach}, journal = {The Linguistic Review}, volume = {28}, number = {4}, year = {2011}, pages = {533{\textendash}599}, abstract = {

Abstract Coptic {(Ancient} Egyptian, 3rd to 12th c. {CE)} is a language of the isolating/analytic type, with an almost one-to-one correspondence between functional morphemes and words. The present study aims at an exhaustive description and analysis of the language\&$\#$39;s large and diversified inventory of particle words. Functional or grammatical particles encode code tense, aspect, mood categories on the one hand and register wh-dependencies in a broad range of focus-sensitive constructions on the other hand. The central hypotheses are: (i) functional particles are not acategorial parts of speech, but rather fall into two distinct classes of verb-related and complementizer-related categories, (ii) they are not in any sense structurally deficient heads: they can project a specifier position (when endowed with an {EPP} feature) and they can act as phase heads and (iii) the core syntax of the language is laid down by the positive setting of an analyticity macroparameter {(Huang}, {Sino\–Kwa:} Analyticity, parametric theory, and the lexical-functional divide, 2008). High analyticity involves the division of labor between defective verbal categories and morphologically independent tense particles, which agree with but do not attract the main verb.

}, url = {http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/tlir.2011.28.issue-4/tlir.2011.015/tlir.2011.015.xml}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @article {1082, title = {Review of David Lightfoot {\textquoteright}How new languages emerge{\textquoteright}}, journal = {Journal of Linguistics}, volume = {46}, year = {2010}, pages = {239-249}, doi = {10.1017/S0022226709990338}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @article {512, title = {Ancient Egyptian verbal reduplication: typology, diachrony, and the morphology-syntax interface.}, journal = {Morphology}, volume = {19}, year = {2009}, pages = {135-157}, author = {Sabrina Bendjaballah and Chris Reintges} } @article {PHIL:PHIL279, title = {Tractarian S{\"a}tze, Egyptian hierogliphs, and the very idea of script as picture}, journal = {The Philosophical Forum}, volume = {39}, number = {1}, year = {2008}, pages = {1{\textendash}19}, publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Inc}, issn = {1467-9191}, doi = {10.1111/j.1467-9191.2007.00279.x}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9191.2007.00279.x}, author = {Jespersen, Bj{\o}rn and Chris Reintges} } @article {509, title = {R{\'e}duplication et temps-aspect-mode : l{\textquoteright}exemple de l{\textquoteright}{\'e}gyptien ancien.}, journal = {Faits de Langues}, volume = {29}, year = {2007}, pages = {145-160}, author = {Sabrina Bendjaballah and Chris Reintges} }