@conference {7294, title = {Australian vs. Romance avertives}, year = {2022}, month = {10/2022}, address = {Station d{\textquoteright}{\'e}cologie foresti{\`e}re, Fontainebleau}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Pahontu, Beatrice} } @conference {7469, title = {The Binary [{\textpm} FUTURE] Tense System of Early Egyptian}, year = {2022}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {7293, title = {On the development of Romance vs. Australian avertives: Modal bases and aspectual meanings}, year = {2022}, month = {12/2022}, address = {University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas}, abstract = {

On the development of Romance vs. Australian avertives: modal bases and aspectual meanings

(Workshop Failed Expectations and Thwarted Intentions: Avertivity and frustrativity in crosslinguistic perspective)

This talk will give further substance to the claim made in (Caudal 2018) that demodality encompasses both positive and negative meanings, respectively associated with \‘actuality entailment\’ (1)/(3) postmodal constructions vs. what we will refer to as \‘inactuality entailment\’ postmodal constructions (2)/(4), sometimes realized by separately conventionalized constructions or complex morphological markings (\‘postmodal\’ being here meant in (van der Auwera \& Plungian 1998)\’s sense).

(1)\ \ \ \ \ \  Dieu \ \  a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  voulu \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  qu\’il \ \  survive \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \à \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  la\ \  guerre.

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  God\ \ \ \  have.3sg.PR\ \ \  want.PP\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  that.he survive-3sg.SUBJ.PR to\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  the war

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \‘God willed it that he should survive the war (= God willed it, and he survived).

(2)\ \ \ \ \ \  Il \ \ \ \ \ \ \  a\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  voulu\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  ouvrir \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  la \ \ \ \ \ \ \  porte.

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  He\ \ \ \ \ \  have.3sg.PR\ \ \  want.PP\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  open-INF\ \ \ \ \ \ \  the\ \ \ \ \ \  door

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \‘He (vainly) tried to open the door.\’

(3)\ \ \ \ \ \  Il \ \ \ \ \ \ \  a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  pu \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  ouvrir \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  la\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  porte.

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  He\ \ \ \ \ \  have.3sg.PR\ \ \  be.able-PP\ \ \ \ \  open-INF\ \ \ \ \ \ \  the\ \ \ \ \ \  door

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \‘He managed to open the door.\’

(4)\ \ \ \ \ \  Il \ \ \ \ \ \ \  n\’a \ \ \ \ \  \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  pas \ \ \ \  pu \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  ouvrir \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  la \ \ \ \ \ \ \  porte.

He\ \ \ \ \ \  NEG.have.3sg.PR\ \ \ \ \  NEG\ \  be.able-PP\ \ \ \ \  open-INF\ \ \ \ \ \ \  the\ \ \ \ \ \  door

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \‘He (tried and) failed to open the door\’.

A brief areal comparative account of demodality across Europe vs. Australia based on a sample of 40 languages (capitalizing on the results of (Caudal 2022a) for its Australian part), will reveal that while SAE languages seem to offer both \‘positive\’ and \‘negative\’ demodal meanings, with a predominance of the former over the latter, Australian languages exclusively grammaticalize or constructionalize negative postmodal meanings \– especially so-called avertives (Kuteva et al. 2019), cf. (5)-(6).

(5)\ \ \ \ \ \  ayana-wu-ni \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  (Iwaidja)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  1sg\>3pl.FRUST-hit-FRUST\ \ \ \ \  (TAIM20181114DY@00:04:11) (Author\’s filedwork)

\‘I was going to hit them but didn\’t/nearly hit them\’.

(6)\ \ \ \ \ \  na-buk\ \ \ \  yimarnek\ \ \  ki-buddu-karlkkangki\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  la.\ \ \  \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  (Kunbarlang)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  i-person\ \  CTFCT\ \ \ \ \ \  3sg.neg-3pl.obj-stalk.irr.pst \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  conj

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  kadda-rnay\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  la\ \ \ \ \ \  kadda-bum.

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  3pl.nf-see.pst\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  conj\ \  3pl.nf-hit.pst

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \‘He was going to sneak up on them, but they saw him \& beat him\’ (Kapitonov 2019:291)

The core research question addressed in this paper will be \– what is the reason behind this typological asymmetry? After identifying distinct, sometimes overlapping development paths for the various categories at stake in both SAE and Australian languages (with avertivity primarily deriving from volitional/proximative aspectuo-modal meanings in Australia), we will hypothesize that the observable differences between Europe and Australia mostly originate in deep differences in the respective types of aspectual systems found in \‘Standard Average European\’ (Haspelmath 1998) (especially Romance and Germanic) vs. Australian languages. In particular, following (Caudal 2022b), we will argue that Australian languages frequently lack combinations of \‘strong\’ perfective aspectual operators with modal operators in their morphology and lexicon, as they tend to only possess aspectually underspecified and/or \‘weak\’ perfective tenses the sense of (Martin 2019) \– i.e., past tenses, which even when endowed with perfective meanings, can disregard culminating interpretations, cf. (7), which is an instance of a so-called \‘non-culminating accomplishment\’ (Bar-El, Davis \& Matthewson 2006).

(7)\ \ \ \ \ \  n-alyubaru-nu=ma \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  y-akina \ \ \  \ \ \ yinumaninga \ akena nara\ \ \ \  (Anindilyakwa)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  REAL.3M-eat-PST=CTYP MASC-that MASC.food\ \  but \ \ \ \ \  NEG

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  kin-alyubari-na

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  IRR.3M\>MASC-eat-PST

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \‘He began to eat the wild apple, but didn\’t finish it\’\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  (Bednall 2019: 206)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  (weak perfective; partitive culmination \– event began but failed to culminate)

We will conclude by arguing for the centrality of an aspectual-coercion based origin of demodal meanings in Germanic \& Romance (although it is not exclusive \– Romanian thus offers an Australian-like, imperfective avertive (Pahontu forthcoming)) \– and will suggest that such instances of aspectual coercion should not be regarded as a matter of mere type-shifting operator \à la (de Swart 1998), but as a richer, multi-dimensional type of meaning \à la (Gutzmann 2015), combining a non-at-issue modal meaning (formerly at-issue), with an innovative \‘actuality entailment\’, at issue meaning. Of course, such developments are entirely lacking in Australian languages, for want of proper \‘strong\’ perfective grams combining with modal markers.

References

Auwera, Johan van der \& Vladimir Plungian. 1998. Modality\’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79\–124.

Bar-El, Leora, Henry Davis \& Lisa Matthewson. 2006. On Non-Culminating Accomplishments. In Leah Bateman \& Cherlon Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 35), vol. 1, 87\–102. Amherst, MA.: GLSA (Graduate Linguistic Student Association), Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts.

Bednall, James. 2019. Temporal, aspectual and modal expression in Anindilyakwa, the language of the Groote Eylandt archipelago, Australia. Canberra / Paris: ANU \& Universit\é de Paris-Diderot PhD Thesis.

Caudal, Patrick. 2018. Demodality: profiling a novel category at the tense/aspect \– modality divide. Presented at the 13th International Conference on Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality (Chronos 13), Universit\é de Neuch\âtel.

Caudal, Patrick. 2022a. Avertive/frustrative markers in Australian languages: blurring the boundaries between aspectuo-temporal and modal meanings. In Kasia M. Jaszczolt (ed.), Understanding Human Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Caudal, Patrick. 2022b. Culmination/telicity and event delineation in Australian Languages: phonology, morphosyntax, semantics and pragmatics. In Nora Boneh, Daniel Harbour, Ora Matushansky \& Isabelle Roy (eds.), Building on Babel\’s Rubble. Saint Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.

Gutzmann, Daniel. 2015. Use-Conditional Meaning: Studies in Multidimensional Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. How young is standard average european? Language Sciences 20(3)(3). 271\–287.

Kapitonov, Ivan. 2019. A grammar of Kunbarlang. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne. http://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/handle/11343/225743 (1 November, 2020).

Kuteva, Tania, Bas Aarts, Gergana Popova \& Anvita Abbi. 2019. The grammar of \‘non-realization.\’ Studies in Language 43(4). 850\–895. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18044.kut.

Martin, Fabienne. 2019. Non-culminating accomplishments. Language and Linguistics Compass 13(8). 1\–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12346.

Pahontu, Beatrice. forthcoming. P\ériphrases progressives/proximatives et avertivit\é en roumain. Universit\é de Paris / Universitatea din Bucure{\c s}ti PhD Thesis.

Swart, Henri\ëtte de. 1998. Aspect Shift and Coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16(2). 347\–385.

}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Pahontu, Beatrice} } @conference {7470, title = {Direct and Indirect Modification in Coptic}, year = {2022}, address = {Leyde}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {7374, title = {French evaluative adjectives: position and interpretation}, year = {2022}, month = {10/2022}, address = {Paris, France}, url = {https://le-2022.sciencesconf.org/data/pages/book_le_2022_en.pdf}, author = {Brunetti, Lisa and Thiberge, Gabriel} } @conference {7372, title = {La polys{\'e}mie et l{\textquoteright}argument d{\'e}rivationnel}, year = {2022}, month = {Reims}, author = {Fradin, Bernard}, editor = {Palma, Silvia and Hilgert, Emilia and Kleiber, Georges and Frath, Pierre} } @conference {7292, title = {The negative vs. positive facets of demodality: How can we account for (some) deep differences between European and Australian languages?}, year = {2022}, month = {06/2022}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Caen Normandie, Caen}, abstract = {

The negative vs. positive facets of demodality: how can we account for deep differences between European and Australian languages?

This talk will give further substance to the claim in (Caudal 2018) that demodality encompasses both positive and negative meanings, respectively associated with \‘actuality entailment\’ (1)/(3) postmodal constructions vs. what I will refer to as \‘inactuality entailment\’ postmodal constructions (2)/(4), sometimes realized by separately conventionalized constructions or complex morphological markings (\‘postmodal\’ being here meant in (van der Auwera \& Plungian 1998)\’s sense).

(1)\ \ \ \ \ \  Dieu \ \  a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  voulu \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  qu\’il \ \  survive \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \à \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  la\ \  guerre.

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  God\ \ \ \  have.3sg.PR\ \ \  want.PP\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  that.he survive-3sg.SUBJ.PR to\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  the war

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \‘God willed it that he should survive the war (= God willed it, and he survived).

(2)\ \ \ \ \ \  Il \ \ \ \ \ \ \  a\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  voulu\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  ouvrir \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  la \ \ \ \ \ \ \  porte.

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  He\ \ \ \ \ \  have.3sg.PR\ \ \  want.PP\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  open-INF\ \ \ \ \ \ \  the\ \ \ \ \ \  door

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \‘He (vainly) tried to open the door.\’

(3)\ \ \ \ \ \  Il \ \ \ \ \ \ \  a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  pu \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  ouvrir \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  la\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  porte.

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  He\ \ \ \ \ \  have.3sg.PR\ \ \  be.able-PP\ \ \ \ \  open-INF\ \ \ \ \ \ \  the\ \ \ \ \ \  door

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \‘He managed to open the door.\’

(4)\ \ \ \ \ \  Il \ \ \ \ \ \ \  n\’a \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  pas \ \ \ \  pu \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  ouvrir \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  la \ \ \ \ \ \ \  porte.

He\ \ \ \ \ \  NEG.have.3sg.PR\ \ \ \ \  NEG\ \  be.able-PP\ \ \ \ \  open-INF\ \ \ \ \ \ \  the\ \ \ \ \ \  door

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \‘He (tried and) failed to open the door\’.

A brief areal comparative account of demodality across Europe vs. Australia based on a sample of 40 languages (capitalizing on the results of (Caudal 2022a) for its Australian part), will reveal that while SAE languages seem to offer both \‘positive\’ and \‘negative\’ demodal meanings, with a predominance of the former over the latter, Australian languages exclusively grammaticalize or constructionalize negative postmodal meanings \– especially so-called avertives (Kuteva et al. 2019), cf. (5)-(6).

(5)\ \ \ \ \ \  ayana-wu-ni \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  (Iwaidja)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  1sg\>3pl.FRUST-hit-FRUST\ \ \ \ \  (TAIM20181114DY@00:04:11) (Author\’s filedwork)

\‘I was going to hit them but didn\’t/nearly hit them\’.

(6)\ \ \ \ \ \  na-buk\ \ \ \  yimarnek\ \ \  ki-buddu-karlkkangki\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  la.\ \ \  \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  (Kunbarlang)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  i-person\ \  CTFCT\ \ \ \ \ \  3sg.neg-3pl.obj-stalk.irr.pst \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  conj

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  kadda-rnay\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  la\ \ \ \ \ \  kadda-bum.

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  3pl.nf-see.pst\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  conj\ \  3pl.nf-hit.pst

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \‘He was going to sneak up on them, but they saw him \& beat him\’ (Kapitonov 2019:291)

The core research question addressed in this paper will be \– what is the reason behind this typological asymmetry? After identifying distinct, sometimes overlapping development paths for the various categories at stake in both SAE and Australian languages (with avertivity primarily deriving from volitional/proximative aspectuo-modal meanings in Australia), I will hypothesize that the observable differences between Europe and Australia mostly originate in deep differences in the respective types of aspectual systems found in \‘Standard Average European\’ (Haspelmath 1998) (especially Romance and Germanic) vs. Australian languages. In particular, following (Caudal 2022b), I will argue that Australian languages frequently lack combinations of \‘strong\’ perfective aspectual operators with modal operators in their morphology and lexicon, as they tend to only possess aspectually underspecified and/or \‘weak\’ perfective tenses the sense of (Martin 2019) \– i.e., past tenses, which even when endowed with perfective meanings, can disregard culminating interpretations, cf. (7), which is an instance of a so-called \‘non-culminating accomplishment\’ (Bar-El, Davis \& Matthewson 2006).

(7)\ \ \ \ \ \  n-alyubaru-nu=ma \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  y-akina \ \ \  \ \ yinumaninga akena \ \  nara\ \ \ \  (Anindilyakwa)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  REAL.3M-eat-PST=CTYP MASC-that MASC.food\ \  but \ \ \ \ \  NEG

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  kin-alyubari-na

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  IRR.3M\>MASC-eat-PST

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \‘He began to eat the wild apple, but didn\’t finish it\’\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  (Bednall 2019: 206)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  (weak perfective; partitive culmination \– event began but failed to culminate)

I will conclude by arguing for the centrality of an aspectual-coercion based origin of demodal meanings in Germanic \& Romance (although it is not exclusive \– Romanian thus offers an Australian-like, imperfective avertive (Pahontu forthcoming)), arguing that such instances of aspectual coercion should not be regarded as a matter of mere type-shifting operator \à la (de Swart 1998), but as a richer, multi-dimensional type of meaning \à la (Gutzmann 2015), combining a non-at-issue modal meaning (formerly at-issue), with an innovative \‘actuality entailment\’, at issue meaning. Of course, such developments are entirely lacking in Australian languages, for want of proper \‘strong\’ perfective grams combining with modal markers.

References

Auwera, Johan van der \& Vladimir Plungian. 1998. Modality\’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79\–124.

Bar-El, Leora, Henry Davis \& Lisa Matthewson. 2006. On Non-Culminating Accomplishments. In Leah Bateman \& Cherlon Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 35), vol. 1, 87\–102. Amherst, MA.: GLSA (Graduate Linguistic Student Association), Department of Linguistics, South College, University of Massachusetts.

Bednall, James. 2019. Temporal, aspectual and modal expression in Anindilyakwa, the language of the Groote Eylandt archipelago, Australia. Canberra / Paris: ANU \& Universit\é de Paris-Diderot PhD Thesis.

Caudal, Patrick. 2018. Demodality: profiling a novel category at the tense/aspect \– modality divide. Presented at the 13th International Conference on Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality (Chronos 13), Universit\é de Neuch\âtel.

Caudal, Patrick. 2022a. Avertive/frustrative markers in Australian languages: blurring the boundaries between aspectuo-temporal and modal meanings. In Kasia M. Jaszczolt (ed.), Understanding Human Time (Oxford Studies of Time in Language and Thought), 22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Caudal, Patrick. 2022b. Culmination/telicity and event delineation in Australian Languages: phonology, morphosyntax, semantics and pragmatics. In Nora Boneh, Daniel Harbour, Ora Matushansky \& Isabelle Roy (eds.), Building on Babel\’s Rubble. Saint Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.

Gutzmann, Daniel. 2015. Use-Conditional Meaning: Studies in Multidimensional Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haspelmath, Martin. 1998. How young is standard average european? Language Sciences 20(3)(3). 271\–287.

Kapitonov, Ivan. 2019. A grammar of Kunbarlang. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne. http://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/handle/11343/225743 (1 November, 2020).

Kuteva, Tania, Bas Aarts, Gergana Popova \& Anvita Abbi. 2019. The grammar of \‘non-realization.\’ Studies in Language 43(4). 850\–895. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18044.kut.

Martin, Fabienne. 2019. Non-culminating accomplishments. Language and Linguistics Compass 13(8). 1\–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12346.

Pahontu, Beatrice. forthcoming. P\ériphrases progressives/proximatives et avertivit\é en roumain. Universit\é de Paris / Universitatea din Bucure{\c s}ti PhD Thesis.

Swart, Henri\ëtte de. 1998. Aspect Shift and Coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16(2). 347\–385.

}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Pahontu, Beatrice} } @conference {7418, title = {The problem of pseudoclefts in French: intesection configurations and intervention in language acquisition}, year = {2022}, address = {Frankfurt}, author = {Carla Soares-Jesel and Maria Lobo and Ana L{\'u}cia Santos} } @conference {7503, title = {A sociolinguistic perspective on contact-induced language change (从社会语言学角度看语言接触引起的语言演变)}, year = {2022}, month = {03/2022}, address = {CRLAO (EHESS/CNRS), Paris}, abstract = {

In this talk, I will present concepts and models that will be used in order to better understand the sociolinguisic conditions which allowed language change in Northern China, bith historically and synchronically. I propose that these models, especially the \«\ Optimization strategies framework\ \» proposed by Muysken (2013) may allow us to bridge the gap between present-day language contact situations leading to language change in the region and documented historical changes for which we know little about the sociolinguistic situations that caused them.

在本讲座中,我将介绍一些概念和模型,以便更好地理解中国北方的社会语言条件如何使中国北方的语言在历史上和在当今时代进行演变。我建议这些模型,特别是Muysken2013)提出的 \"优化策略框架\",可以让我们弥合导致该地区语言演变的当今语言接触情况和有记录的历史语言演变之间的差距,因为我们对造成这些演变的社会语言状况知之甚少。

}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {7282, title = {Acceptability of extractions out of adjuncts depends on discourse factors}, year = {2021}, month = {03/2021}, author = {Edward, Gibson and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel Elodie and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {7416, title = {The acquisition of clefts in French: a contribution to the understanding of intervention effects in language acquisition}, year = {2021}, address = {Amsterdam}, author = {Carla Soares-Jesel and Maria Lobo and Ana L{\'u}cia Santos} } @conference {7090, title = {Aspect in Chinese: Toward a unidimensional model}, year = {2021}, month = {04/2021}, address = {Universit{\'e} Sorbonne Nouvelle}, abstract = {

The systematic study of aspect in Chinese started in the late 20th century, and due to typological considerations and to the influence of Vendler\’s (1957) seminal work, aspect in Chinese was compared to its counterpart in English, rather than Russian. Smith\’s model of aspect has also been widely used in Chinese linguistics, not the least because she herself published about aspect in Chinese (Smith 1990; 1994; 1997; Smith et Erbaugh 2005). But some linguists have argued for the specificity of Chinese regarding the expression of aspectual meaning.
Thus, in this talk, we start by reviewing works that adopt the bi-dimensional approach to aspect \– distinguishing \“situation aspect\” from \“viewpoint aspect\” (Smith 1997), while discussing the relevance of certain situation types for Chinese.
We then discuss propositions of three-dimensional models for Chinese, like Xiao and McEnery\&$\#$39;s (2004), where the analysis of situation aspect is split in two levels, to explain how aspect operates both at the lexical and the phrasal levels. Similarly, Jin (金立鑫 2008) advocates a distinction between Aktionsart (applying to lexical verbs ) and situation types (encompassing verb phrases). Such a distinction aims to disentangle what in aspectual meanings pertains to the
lexicon proper, as opposed to morphosyntax.
However, we aim to show that it is not a straightforward task, given the imbrication of the lexical and the morpho-syntactic levels as regards aspectual meaning. As exemplified in (1-3) below (examples from Lin 2004), alongside verb meaning, perfective grammatical aspect marker -le crucially contributes to the definition of situation types.
(1) State
zhe shuang xie hen po
this CL shoe very broken
This pair of shoes is lousy.


(2) State + -le \à Achievement
zhe shuang xie po-le
this CL shoe broken-PFV
This pair of shoes is worn out.


(3) Activity + [Achievement State+ -le] \à Accomplishment
zhe shuang xie chuan-po-le
this CL shoe wear-broken-PFV
This pair of shoes has been worn to tatters.


Building on the difficulty to ascertain the aspectual specifications of verbs abstracted from their morphosyntactic contexts in Chinese, we argue for a unidimensional model, ranging from the lexicon to aspectual syntax. We adopt Michaelis\&$\#$39; (2004) claims that the lexicon (verb types) and the morphosyntax (aspectual operators) basically use the same aspectual classes, the same
basic distinction obtaining at both levels. Focusing on three different aspect markers \– perfective -le, durative -zhe and progressive zai, we describe coercion as a central operation accounting for the versatility of aspectual types in Chinese.

}, keywords = {aspect, Chinese, coercion}, url = {www.aspect2021.sciencesconf.org}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {7468, title = {Coptic Hidden Movement}, year = {2021}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {6679, title = {The acceptability of extractions from subjects depends on the discourse status of the subject}, year = {2020}, month = {09/2020}, address = {Postdam (Virtual Conference)}, url = {https://amlap2020.github.io/a/239.pdf}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel, Elodie and Gibson, Edward} } @conference {6673, title = {Acceptability of VP ellipsis: discourse conditions vs. syntactic identity}, year = {2020}, month = {03/2020}, address = {Amherst (MA) (Virtual Conference)}, url = {https://people.umass.edu/bwdillon/CUNY_2020_Abstracts/A66_Final_Manuscript.pdf}, author = {Philip Miller and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6838, title = {Aspectual coercion in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2020}, month = {02/2020}, address = {LingLunch Paris Diderot}, abstract = {

Authors such as (Smith 1997) propose that the double articulation of Aspect in \"situation\" and \"viewpoint\" components is universal, and applies in particular to Mandarin Chinese (see also Smith 1990; 1994; Smith and Erbaugh 2005).

Jin Lixin (金立鑫2008) pleads instead for a three-tiered aspectual description for Chinese, a language where, according to him, both Aktionsart and situation types are salient and contribute to the overall aspect specification of sentences. Jin uses the concept of \“Aktionsart\” to refer to aspect qualities residing in verbs proper, and the term \“situation types\” to refer to aspectual traits of verb phrases. For him, at least two types of verbs (未实现动词 and 实现动词 ) may by themselves decide of the aspectual specification of a sentence. In all other cases, the verbs\’ Aktionsart is not salient enough and other elements such as grammatical aspect markers of various types contribute to the overall aspectual properties of the sentence.

Such an approach is precious for untangling what in aspectual meanings pertains to the lexicon proper, and what pertains to morpho-syntax. This has been a very difficult question from the start, since it could be seen even from Vendler\’s influential paper (Vendler 1957) that the distinction between inherent aspectual features of the verbs and aspectual traits brought by the verb\’s complements (as in the well-known \‘run\’ (Activity) vs. \‘run a mile\’ (Accomplishment) contrast) was difficult.

The general question then could be formulated as: where do aspectual specifications lie? How is it possible to ascertain the aspectual specifications of verbs abstracted from the morpho-syntactic contexts in which they are inserted? What is the contribution of elements such as verbal suffixes, verbal complements (such as resultative or directional complements), verbal classifiers, adverbs, etc.?

The question could be reformulated as: whether lexical verbs do have aspectual specification in Chinese; on the other hand, how much do they rely on morpho-syntax for their aspectual specification?

At the morpho-syntactic level, we want to point to the pervasiveness of coercion phenomena, as described by De Swart 1998 or Michaelis 2004 for English and French, and try to identify the principal coercion operators.

}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {7466, title = {Dative-Benefactive Possessive Sentences in Early Egyptian}, year = {2020}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {6522, title = {Derivation predicting inflection The role of families, series and morphotactics}, year = {2020}, month = {February}, address = {Vienna}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Matteo Pellegrini} } @conference {6967, title = {Distributional assessment of derivational semantics}, year = {2020}, month = {August}, author = {Mat{\'\i}as Guzm{\'a}n Naranjo and Olivier Bonami} } @conference {6677, title = {Mathematical to language priming: New evidence from French}, year = {2020}, month = {09/2020}, address = {Potsdam (Virtual Conference)}, url = {https://amlap2020.github.io/a/187.pdf}, author = {Hedier, Antoine and Pozniak, Celine and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6678, title = {Non-syntactic constraints on syntactic alternations - L1 acquisition of French partial interrogatives by TD children}, year = {2020}, month = {09/2020}, address = {Postdam (Virtual Conference)}, author = {Thiberge, Gabriel and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6674, title = {(Pseudo-)reflexive possessive binding: crosslinguistic experiments}, year = {2020}, month = {03/2020}, address = {Amherst (MA) (Virtual Conference)}, url = {https://osf.io/c7bzv/}, author = {Suzanne Lesage and Barbara Hemforth and Olivier Bonami} } @conference {7467, title = {Residual Verb Movement in an Analytic Language}, year = {2020}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {6670, title = {The subject island as a case of focus-background conflict}, year = {2020}, month = {02/2020}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel, Elodie and Gibson, Edward} } @conference {6675, title = {Subject island: PP extraction depends on the construction}, year = {2020}, month = {03/2020}, address = {Amherst (MA) (Virtual Conference)}, url = {https://osf.io/ndtvw/}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel, Elodie and Gibson, Edward} } @conference {6672, title = {Subject NP island? A case of focus-background conflict. }, year = {2020}, month = {04/2020}, address = {MIT (Virtual Workshop)}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel, Elodie and Gibson, Edward} } @conference {6671, title = {Unacceptable VPE with identical antecedents: Disentangling the effects of discourse conditions and mismatch on the acceptability of Verb Phrase Ellipsis}, year = {2020}, month = {02/2020}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, author = {Philip Miller and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6676, title = {Verbal mismatch in French Right-Node Raising: Speeded grammaticality judgments}, year = {2020}, month = {07/2020}, address = {Paris (Virtual Conference)}, url = {http://drehu.linguist.univ-paris-diderot.fr/ecbae-2020/fichiers/abstracts/hemforth.pdf}, author = {Barbara Hemforth and Antoine Heider and Theodor Cucu and Lisa Hemforth and Hugo Techer and Yair Haendler and Joanna Dos Reis and Doriane Gras} } @conference {7415, title = {The acquisition of clefts: syntax and information structure}, year = {2019}, month = {25-26 avril}, address = {KU Leuven}, author = {Carla Soares-Jesel and Maria Lobo} } @conference {6364, title = {Alternative constructions and scope ambiguities: What counts as an alternative?}, year = {2019}, month = {03/2019}, doi = {DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29520.97282}, url = {https://www.colorado.edu/event/cuny2019/sites/default/files/attached-files/c51_hemforth_konieczny.pdf}, author = {Barbara Hemforth and Lars Konieczny} } @conference {6404, title = {Capturing generalizations about exponence}, year = {2019}, month = {June}, address = {Ljubljana}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Berthold Crysmann} } @conference {6572, title = {Contours continuatifs aux fronti{\`e}res prosodiques du fran{\c c}ais : production et perception par les apprenants japonophones}, year = {2019}, author = {Rachel Albar} } @conference {6611, title = {Cr{\'e}ole et fran{\c c}ais r{\'e}gional {\`a} Maurice: influences morphosyntaxiques et lexicales}, year = {2019}, month = {12/2019}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Vienne}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {6412, title = {Discourse conditions on Verb Phrase Ellipsis and the question of syntactic identity: new evidence from acceptability experiments}, year = {2019}, month = {09/2019}, address = {Moscou, Russie}, author = {Philip Miller and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6571, title = {Do Japanese learners distinguish prosodic levels in French?}, year = {2019}, author = {Rachel Albar and Hiyon Yoo} } @conference {6511, title = {How Japanese learners produce continuation in French?}, year = {2019}, month = {09/2019}, author = {Rachel Albar and Hiyon Yoo} } @conference {6989, title = {On the phonetic contrast between fortis and non-fortis fricatives in Korean: interaction with prosodic position effect and vowel coarticulation}, year = {2019}, month = {05/2019}, author = {Boram Lee and Hiyon Yoo and Fougeron, C{\'e}cile} } @conference {6556, title = {Prosodic cues for expressivity and questioning force in a French reason question}, year = {2019}, address = {Constance, Allemagne}, author = {Rachel Albar and Brunetti, Lisa and Lucia M. Tovena and Hiyon Yoo} } @conference {6366, title = {A Rational Speech Act model of cross-linguistic differences in pronoun resolution preferences}, year = {2019}, month = {03/2019}, doi = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331983817_A_Rational_Speech_Act_model_of_cross-linguistic_differences_in_pronoun_resolution_preferences}, url = {https://www.colorado.edu/event/cuny2019/sites/default/files/attached-files/d42_schulz_etal.pdf}, author = {Miriam Schulz and Heather Burnett and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6521, title = {The role of morphology in gender assignment in French}, year = {2019}, month = {September}, address = {Paris}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Mat{\'\i}as Guzm{\'a}n Naranjo and Delphine Tribout} } @conference {6365, title = {Same sized sisters: Relative clause attachment to conjoined NPs}, year = {2019}, month = {03/2019}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.2.32876.41609}, url = {https://www.colorado.edu/event/cuny2019/sites/default/files/attached-files/c55_hedier_etal.pdf}, author = {Hedier, Antoine and Su, Peiha and Maouche, Fahima and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6385, title = {Segmentation in morphology: wh-en, wh-ere, how?}, year = {2019}, month = {May}, address = {Stony Brook}, author = {Sacha Beniamine and Olivier Bonami} } @conference {6559, title = {The semantics and prosody of French comment questions with reason interpretation: expectation disconfirmation and surprise effects}, year = {2019}, author = {Brunetti, Lisa and Lucia M. Tovena and Hiyon Yoo} } @conference {6410, title = {Subject-island constraint? The discourse function of the construction matters}, year = {2019}, month = {09/2019}, address = {Moscou, Russie}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Barbara Hemforth and Winckel, Elodie and Gibson, Edward} } @conference {6592, title = {Variation in French Partial Interrogatives: Social meaning as a key factor.}, year = {2019}, month = {06/2019}, address = {Edinburgh, Scotland}, author = {Thiberge, Gabriel and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6411, title = {Variation in French partial interrogatives: social meaning tells us what?}, year = {2019}, month = {09/2019}, address = {Moscou, Russie}, author = {Thiberge, Gabriel and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {7417, title = {Clitic omission and clitic placement in Portuguese-French bilingual children}, year = {2018}, address = {Bucarest}, author = {Margarida Tomaz and Maria Lobo and Ana Maria Madeira and Carla Soares-Jesel and St{\'e}phanie Vaz} } @conference {6072, title = {Comparative alternation in Mauritian: Using experimental methods for understudied languages}, year = {2018}, month = {02/2018}, address = {Hyderabad, Inde}, author = {Shrita Hassamal and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6610, title = {{\'E}l{\'e}ments de grammaire compar{\'e}e fran{\c c}ais cr{\'e}ole : le cas des proc{\'e}d{\'e}s de mise en relief}, year = {2018}, month = {10/2018}, address = {Universit{\'e} des Seychelles}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {6257, title = {La variation dans les interrogatives partielles du fran{\c c}ais, R{\'e}actualisation des donn{\'e}es et nouvelles perspectives de pragmatique enrichie}, year = {2018}, month = {11/2018}, address = {Orl{\'e}ans}, author = {Thiberge, Gabriel and Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois} } @conference {6512, title = {Les apprenants japonophones distinguent-ils les niveaux prosodiques du fran{\c c}ais ? Le cas du niveau interm{\'e}diaire.}, year = {2018}, month = {12/2018}, author = {Rachel Albar and Hiyon Yoo} } @conference {6080, title = {Linguistic evidence across languages}, year = {2018}, month = {02/2018}, author = {Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {7465, title = {The Morphosyntax of Participial Relative Clauses Cross-linguistically}, year = {2018}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {6193, title = {Optionality in French partial interrogatives: a powerful factor in social meaning games}, year = {2018}, month = {08/2018}, address = {Paris}, author = {Thiberge, Gabriel} } @conference {6232, title = {Quantitative evidence for paradigm structure}, year = {2018}, month = {June}, address = {Budapest}, author = {Olivier Bonami} } @conference {6807, title = {Structure of French a- Prefixed Deadjectival -ir Verbs}, year = {2018}, month = {01/2018}, address = {University of the Basque Country, in Bilbao}, url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322581817_Structure_of_French_a-_Prefixed_Deadjectival_-ir_Verbs}, author = {Garet, Patty} } @conference {6089, title = {The Time Course of Pronoun Resolution in Natural Text Reading}, year = {2018}, month = {02/2018}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, author = {Olga Seminck and Pascal Amsili} } @conference {6195, title = {Variation in French interrogatives, Social Meaning as a key factor to understand sociolinguistic norm violations}, year = {2018}, month = {09/2018}, address = {Berlin, Germany}, author = {Thiberge, Gabriel and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6194, title = {Variation in French partial interrogatives: social meaning as a key factor to understand sociolinguistic norm violations}, year = {2018}, month = {09/2018}, address = {Berlin, Germany}, author = {Thiberge, Gabriel and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6134, title = {语段理论与介入效应:跨语言视角下的两种局部性概念}, year = {2018}, address = {浙江大学}, abstract = {

}, author = {Xiaoshi Hu} } @conference {5895, title = {A Bayesian Game-Theoretic Approach to Cross-Linguistic Variation. }, year = {2017}, month = {06/2017}, url = {http://xprag2017.uni-koeln.de/sites/xprag2017/user_upload/BurnettHemforth.pdf}, author = {Heather Burnett and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5611, title = {A computational approach to the abstraction of morphopholonogical alternations}, year = {2017}, month = {01/2017}, address = {Paris}, author = {Sacha Beniamine} } @conference {7462, title = {Copto-Graeco Adjectives. }, year = {2017}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {5626, title = { Cross-domain priming from mathematics to relative-clause attachment: A visual-world study in French}, year = {2017}, month = {04/2017}, address = {Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston}, author = {Pozniak, Celine and Scheepers, Christoph} } @conference {7471, title = {Diagnosing Phase Boundaries in Participial Relative Clauses}, year = {2017}, author = {Chris Reintges and Caterina Donati} } @conference {7464, title = {Diagnosing Phase Boundaries in Participial Relative Clauses}, year = {2017}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {6208, title = {Emergence of grammatical markers in Mauritian Creole: Is there a creole-specific reanalysis?}, year = {2017}, month = {2017}, address = {University of Giessen, Germany}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {6209, title = {Etude d{\textquoteright}innovations en cr{\'e}ole {\`a} partir de l{\textquoteright}analyse du fran{\c c}ais r{\'e}gional de Maurice}, year = {2017}, month = {2017}, address = {lendon College, York University, Toronto}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {7472, title = {Graeco{\textendash}Copto Adjectives: Adjectival Borrowing into an Adjective-Poor Language}, year = {2017}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {5999, title = {How Japanese learners perceive and produce clusters in French?}, year = {2017}, month = {09/2017}, author = {Rachel Albar and Hiyon Yoo} } @conference {5846, title = {Implicit causality: When more than one explanation is missing}, year = {2017}, month = {03/2017}, abstract = {

It has been shown that focus particles like \“only\” and \“even\” give way to a pattern of pronoun production and resolution similar to what has been observed with implicit causality verbs like \“criticize\” or \“annoy\” in (1) where so-called N1-biased verbs like \“annoyed\” systematically provoke explanations related to the subject (Peter) and N2-biased verbs like \“criticized\” continuations related to the object (Mary).

  1. Peter annoyed/criticized Mary because ..

Continuation studies with sentences like (2), using unbiased verbs show that an antecedent in the scope of \“only\” similarly systematically attracts continuations while an antecedent in the scope of \“even\” is systematically dispreferred.

  1. Only/Even Peter called Mary because \…

Following Bott and Solstad (2014), we argue that focus particles as well as IC verbs, when combined with discourse connectives like because, create expectations for an explanation

about the ensuing discourse that needs to be filled to avoid the accommodation of missing information. These explanations, which reflect the relationship between the focus entity in the

scope of the particle and the set of alternatives related to it, introduce a bias for one of the two potential antecedents. \“Only\” triggers a missing explanation of exclusivity: why does only Peter call and nobody else. \“Even\”, on the other hand, triggers an explanation of the unlikeliness of Peter calling, what it is about Mary that makes even him call.

An obvious and still open question is what happens when we combine biased verbs with focus particles thus provoking matching or mismatching expectations. We expected that matching biases (even N1 + N2-biased verb; only N1 + N1-biased verb) where the focus particle and the verb bias demand an explanation related to the same antecedent should provoke the strongest biases since a single explanation can easily be found to fill discourse needs (e.g. \“Only Peter fascinates Mary because he is just the best.\”, \“Even Peter criticized Mary because she really messed up this time.\”). In mismatching cases (even N1 + N1-biased verb; only N1 + N2-biased verb), only one of the missing explanations can easily be provided. In (3) we can either explain exclusivity (\… because he is never satisfied) or the N2-bias of the verb (\… because she had messed up.).

  1. Only Peter criticized Mary because \…

We ran a continuation study in French with 10 N1-biased verbs (4), 10 N2-biased verbs (5), and 10 verbs without bias (6), taken from a recently established corpus of implicit causality biases including 320 French verbs. We constructed preambles with two gender-different proper names with the subject in the scope of \“seul\” or \“m\ême\” (following a Latin Square Design). 84 native French speakers provided continuations to the preambles. All preambles ended with \“parce qu\’\”, strongly encouraging a pronoun continuation (only words with initial vowels can follow \“qu\’\”, \“il\”/he and \“elle\”/she thus become highly likely). In logistic regressions, both, focus particles as well as the IC-bias of the verb showed a significant effect (FP: z= 4.471, p\<.001; IC-bias: N1/N2: z= -8.932, p\<.001; N1/no-bias: z= -4.329, p\<.001). As expected, matching cases showed a very strong bias (Only+N1-bias = 79\% N1; Even+N2-bias: 81\% N2), while mismatching cases were more varied.

N1-bias

  1. Seul/M\ême Marie enchante Adrien parcqu\’ \…

\ \ \ \ \  Only/Even Mary enchants Adrian because \…

N2-bias

\ \ \ \ \  (5) Seul/M\ême Pierre f\élicite Auriane parce qu\’ \…

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  Only/Even Peter congratulates Auriane because \…

No-bias

  1. Seul/M\ême\  Pierre interroge Marie parce qu\’ \…

\ \ \ \ \ \  Only/Even\  Peter visits Marie because \…

}, url = {https://osf.io/xgbv2/}, author = {Israel de la Fuente and Marie Benzerrak and Natalia Kalashnikova and Lala Naziyeva and Ching-chun Wang and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6068, title = {It{\textquoteright}s all about the head: Implicit causality effects on subject and object RCs}, year = {2017}, month = {09/2017}, author = {Pozniak, Celine and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6001, title = {Le corpus Bilingue cor{\'e}en fran{\c c}ais : de la conception {\`a} la segmentation}, year = {2017}, month = {06/2017}, author = {Hiyon Yoo and Inyoung Kim and Philippe Martin} } @conference {6009, title = {Modelling crosslinguistic differences in pronoun resolution}, year = {2017}, month = {09/2017}, address = {Lancaster, Royaume-Uni}, author = {Heather Burnett and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {7461, title = {A New Typology of the Morphology{\textendash}Syntax Interface in Language Change}, year = {2017}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {6000, title = {Perceiving and producing clusters in French: the case of Japanese learners}, year = {2017}, month = {06/2017}, address = {Cologne}, author = {Rachel Albar and Hiyon Yoo} } @conference {5916, title = {Predictability in inflection and word formation}, year = {2017}, month = {June}, author = {Olivier Bonami} } @conference {5635, title = {Predicting Processing Cost of Anaphora Resolution}, year = {2017}, month = {03/2017}, address = {Saarbr{\"u}cken}, author = {Olga Seminck and Pascal Amsili} } @conference {5926, title = {Predicting the meaning of conversions: can the morphological family help?}, year = {2017}, month = {06/2017}, address = {Fribourg / Freiburg (Suisse)}, author = {Fradin, Bernard} } @conference {5810, title = {Principles of information-structure and discourse-structure analysis}, year = {2017}, address = {Saarbruecken, Allemagne}, author = {Brunetti, Lisa and De Kuthy, Kordula and Riester, Arndt} } @conference {5809, title = {A QUD-based analysis of Non-At-Issue material in corpus data}, year = {2017}, address = {Oslo}, author = {Brunetti, Lisa and De Kuthy, Kordula and Riester, Arndt} } @conference {6002, title = {Recherches en phon{\'e}tique et phonologie cor{\'e}enne: th{\'e}ories et applications}, year = {2017}, month = {05/2017}, author = {Hiyon Yoo and Inyoung Kim} } @conference {5625, title = {Relative clause processing, structural and linear distance matter - Evidence from Mandarin, Cantonese and English Visual World experiments}, year = {2017}, month = {04/2017}, address = {Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston }, author = {Pozniak, Celine and Jiaying Huang and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6128, title = {Respectively-interpretation of fenbie and Relativized Minimality}, year = {2017}, month = {04/2017}, abstract = {

}, author = {Xiaoshi Hu} } @conference {5839, title = {Resumption and Case: A new take on Modern Standard Arabic}, year = {2017}, month = {07/2017}, address = {Lexington, Kentucky}, author = {Berthold Crysmann} } @conference {5927, title = {The role and nature of series in lexeme formation morphology}, year = {2017}, month = {19/2017}, address = {Toulouse, Universit{\'e} Jean Jaur{\`e}s}, author = {Fradin, Bernard} } @conference {5936, title = {The semantics of the syntactic position of adjectives in Truku Seediq}, year = {2017}, month = {02/2016}, address = {INaLCO-LACITO}, abstract = {

In studies on linguistic typology concerned with the relative order of nouns and adjectives (Greenberg 1963, Dixon 1977), it is usually considered that most languages have a dominant order. However, this does not prevent the relative position of nouns and adjectives from fluctuating, and in some languages, both N-Adj and Adj-N orders are attested for (some) adjectives. Truku Seediq, a Formosan Austronesian language spoken on the East Coast of Taiwan, exhibits such variation, as briefly mentioned in grammatical studies of the language. Tsukida (2005) describes this double possibility without associating it to any semantic or pragmatic difference, writing: \«\ Verbs (and nouns, too) always appear after the head noun when in modifying function, but some adjectives can appear either before or after the modified noun\ \» (2005: 296). Pecoraro (1979: 50-51) on the other hand considers this difference in syntactic position as semantically meaningful, translating Noun Phrases exhibiting the N-Adj order as definite, and NPs exhibiting the Adj-N order as indefinite.

  1. Parusapax\ \  ka \ \ \ \ \ \  sapax Diyan\ \ \  [adapted from Pecoraro, ibid.]

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  big\ \ \ \ \ \  house\  pred\ \ \  house\  Diyan

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  Diyan\’s house is a big house

  1. Sapaxparu\ \ \ \  ka\ \ \ \ \ \ \  sapax\ \  Diyan\  [adapted from Pecoraro, ibid.]

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  house\  big\ \ \ \ \ \  pred\ \ \  house\  Diyan

Diyan\’s house is the big house

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  This paper aims to question the semantic value of the pre- and post-nominal position of the adjective in Truku Seediq, based on semi-spontaneous oral data. Collected in 2014 using a task design, our data set consist of 39 dyadic interactions for a total of 10,469 words, involving 24 bilingual speakers (Truku Seediq and Mandarin Chinese). Thoroughly transcribed and annotated, these data are fully searchable with digital tools.

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  Based on careful examination of these data, we formulate two main claims. On the syntactic level, the post-nominal position of adjectives in Truku Seediq, similar to their position in closely related languages, is the unmarked one, while the pre-nominal position of adjectives is a marked innovation of Truku Seediq. Secondly, on the semantic and discourse level, we claim that (in-)definiteness of the Noun Phrase is not linked to the position of the adjective. Rather, while post-nominal adjectives have a descriptive -- or non-restrictive modification -- function, pre-nominal adjectives have a restrictive modification function (Martin 2014), as apparent from discourse stretches such as the following:

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  (3)\ \ \ \ \ \  Angal\  ka\ \ \ \ \ \ \  kingal\  pratu

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  take\ \ \ \  pred\ \ \  one\ \ \ \ \  bowl

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  pratu\ \ \  ga

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  bowl\ \ \  det

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  m-banah\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  pratu

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  af-red\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  bowl

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  Take one bowl. That bowl. The red bowl.

This finding was made possible by the dialogic and naturalistic nature of our data set, and would have been obscured by more classical elicitation procedures.

Chang, Yung-li. 2000. A reference grammar of Seediq. Taipei: Yuanliu.

(1)As opposed to Tgdaya/Paran Seediq (Chang 2006: 66, Ochiai 2015), in which only the post-nominal position is available for modifying adjectives.

(2)This data set was constructed as part of the CLAPOTY Project (Agence Nationale pour la Recherche ANR-09-JCJC-0121-01) and fieldwork was co-funded by the LabEx Empirical Foundations of Linguistics.

}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {7463, title = {Spontaneous Syntactic Change: An Anti-Inertia Approach}, year = {2017}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {5847, title = {Subject island? (Counter)evidence from French dont-relative clauses}, year = {2017}, month = {03/2017}, abstract = {

Whether island constraints (Ross 1967) are due to structural (Chomsky 2008, Sprouse et al. 2015, etc.) or cognitive constraints (Klunder 1992, Hofmeister et al. 2013, etc.) is still an open debate. Subject islands have been shown to vary across languages (Rizzi 1990) and across constructions (Sprouse et al. 2015). In French, dont relative clauses (DRC) (Godard 1992) exhibit \‘de\’ (\‘of which\’) complement extraction for verbal (1a), object noun (1b) or subject noun (1c) complements. Mainstream generative approaches predict (1a) to be easier than (1b), and (1b) than (1c). Processing approaches such as DLT (Gibson, 2000) predict the reverse: (1c) should be easier than (1a), and (1a) than (1b), in terms of linear distance between dont and the gap. Furthermore, DLT predicts (2a), with a 1st person subject \‘je\’, to be easier than (1a) and (2b) than (1b).

  1. a. from VP une ville dont mes amis [parlent souvent _ ] (a town of-which my friends often talk )\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  b. from object NP une ville dont mes amis appr\écient [les commer\çants _ ] (a town of-which my friends like the \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  merchants)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  c. from subject NP une ville dont [les commer\çants _ ] vendent de l\’huile (a town of-which the merchants sell oil)

  1. a. from VP une ville dont je [parle souvent _ ] (a town of-which I talk often)

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  b. from object NP une ville dont j\’appr\écie [les commer\çants _ ].

Corpus studies Using the written corpus French Treebank (Abeill\é et al, 2003), we found an overwhelming frequency of extraction out of NP subject (56,5\%) over verb extraction (19\%) and extraction out of NP object (12,5\%) in dont relative clauses. The spoken corpus CFPP2000 (Branca-Rosoff et al. 2012) confirms a high frequency of subject extraction (17,8\% of all dont; 63\% of all extractions out of NP). These subjects are not internal objects: looking at verbs for DRC with extraction out of subject, 67\% of the verbs in the spoken corpus and 47\% in the written corpus are transitive (unergative). Furthermore, almost all extractions out of object NP involve a pronominal subject. Linear mixed models also show that dont significantly tends to correspond to a verb complement with a pronominal subject rather than with a nominal subject (z=7,7; p\<.001).

Experiment 1 In an acceptability judgement task with 57 participants, we tested extraction out of subject and object NPs with pronominal and nominal subjects for the latter (1b/2b), adding control sentences with coordination (3x2 conditions; 30 items). The participants were asked to rate the sentences on a scale from 1 (bad) to 10 (good).

Extraction out of the subject was judged significantly better than extraction out of the object with a nominal subject NP (1b vs. 1c; p\<.05). Extraction out of object NP yielded a significant preference for pronominal over nominal subjects (1b vs. 2b; p\<.05). This confirms the results of our corpus studies.

Experiment 2 We ran an Eye-Tracking experiment with the same materials and 31 native French speakers. Total reading times of the verb region confirmed our previous results (controlling for verb length and frequency).

Conclusion The results of the two corpus studies and two experiments show that there is no extra cost of extracting out of a subject NP in DRC. This contradicts structural approaches to subject islands and confirm DLT predictions. The extra cost of a lexical subject when extracting out of an object NP (new discourse referent between dont and the gap) is confirmed as well.

Table 1: Examples of the materials for Experiment 1 and 2

A /\  Extraction from subject NP

They work in a practice of-which the neatness intimidates my parents every time.

Elles travaillent dans un cabinet dont la propret\é intimide mes parents \à chaque fois.

B /\  Extraction from object NP with a pronominal subject

They work in a practice of-which we admire the neatness every time.

Elles travaillent dans un cabinet dont nous admirons la propret\é \à chaque fois.

C / Extraction from object NP with a nominal subject

They work in a practice of-which my parents admire the neatness every time.

Elles travaillent dans un cabinet dont mes parents admirent la propret\é \à chaque fois.

D /\  Control sentence for A

They work in a practice and its neatness intimidates my parents every time.

Elles travaillent dans un cabinet et sa propret\é intimide mes parents \à chaque fois.

E /\  Control sentence for B

They work in a practice and we admire its neatness every time.

Elles travaillent dans un cabinet et nous admirons sa propret\é \à chaque fois.

F / Control sentence for C

They work in a practice and my parents admire its neatness every time.

Elles travaillent dans un cabinet et mes parents admirent sa propret\é \à chaque fois.
}, author = {Winckel, Elodie and Barbara Hemforth and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {6127, title = {Topic: a case of internal pair merge?}, year = {2017}, month = {10/2017}, abstract = {

}, author = {Chen Zhao and Xiaoshi Hu} } @conference {5841, title = {Variation and competition in realisational morphology: overabundance in Adyghe and Maay}, year = {2017}, month = {06/2017}, address = {Nikosia}, author = {Berthold Crysmann and Olivier Bonami} } @conference {6225, title = {When segmentation helps. Implicative structure and morph boundaries in the Navajo verb}, year = {2017}, month = {December}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Lille}, author = {Sacha Beniamine and Olivier Bonami and Joyce McDonough} } @conference {5865, title = {About the Vietnamese compound nouns}, year = {2016}, month = {05/2016}, address = {Manille (Philippines)}, abstract = {

In an analytic language like vietnamese, according to the position in the utterance, it is relatively easy to recognize the word category of a simple word which can behave as a noun, as a verb, as a particle or as an adverb (Thompson (1965), Nguyen (1997), Cao (2007), Diep (2011), Do-Hurinville (2013)\…). But a compound word has not this characteristic as the following questions are complex to be answered : how to determine the boundary of a compound word in the utterance especially if it is formed by more than two components ? How to distinguish a compound noun from a noun phrase (NP), a compound noun from a compound verb ? Are there any grammatical rules to create this type of word? Which criteria to determine whether a composition of two verbs reveals a compound noun or a serial verb construction? Etc. Therefore, our paper aims to propose an inventory of vietnamese compound nouns (henceforth CN). The study will examine the nature of the relationships between the different components of a CN in order to determine if we can distinguish specific patterns proper to each type (if it depends on the type of the elements invoved or on the semantics of the CN). We define a CN as an singular unit composed by two elements or more (each of which can be a noun, a verb or a pronoun) and this unit functions as a single noun in a noun NP. From this point of view, a CN has the same distribution than a single noun in a NP [Quantification \– NOUN/ CN \– Qualification] Based on syntactic, distributive and semantic criterions, we identify two types of vietnamese CN. In each type, there are different subtypes (cf. (1)-(11)) :-(A) those formed by two heterogenous nouns N 1 N 2 : their semantics construes a collection. We will show that in this type, the notion of \&$\#$39;pluralisation\&$\#$39; comes into matter on different plans (cf. (a 1) \– (a 4))-and (B) those expressing a predicative relation between their elements (cf. (b 1) \– (b 2)) Corpus: a1. N 1 N 2 : N 2 is a complementary of N 1 on semantic plan: (1) \ông-b\à \&$\#$39;grand-father + grand-mother\&$\#$39;-grand-parents\&$\#$39; (2) bố-mẹ \&$\#$39;father + mother-parents\&$\#$39; a2. N 1 and N 2 share a commun property (3) b\àn-ghế \&$\#$39;table + chair-fourniture\&$\#$39; a3. N 2 is a chinese or another language borrowed (4) n\úi-non \&$\#$39;mountain + mountain-moutains\&$\#$39; a4. N 1 is a generic term while N 2 is its sub-type. (5) b\út-ch\ì \&$\#$39;pen-mine-pencil\&$\#$39; b1. X 1 X 2 (6) xe-k\éo \&$\#$39;vehicle + pull-pushchair\&$\#$39; (7) người-ở \&$\#$39;person + live-servant\&$\#$39; (8) thắt-lưng \&$\#$39;tie + back-belt\&$\#$39; (9) tri-thức \&$\#$39;know + know-knowledge\&$\#$39; b2. Pronoun +X 1 + X 2 + \… + X n (10) người-{\dj}ưa-thư \&$\#$39;person + give + letter-factor\&$\#$39; (11) kẻ-{\u a}n-m\ày \&$\#$39;personne + eat + friend-beggar\&$\#$39;

}, author = {Thi Hoang Anh Bui} } @conference {5044, title = {Adverbs in Mauritian}, year = {2016}, address = {CNRS, Pouchet, Paris, France}, author = {Shrita Hassamal} } @conference {5813, title = {Annotation Guidelines for Questions under Discussion and Information Structure}, year = {2016}, address = {Barcelone}, author = {Brunetti, Lisa and De Kuthy, Kordula and Riester, Arndt} } @conference {5535, title = {Are (all) adverbial clauses adjuncts~? }, year = {2016}, month = {07/2016}, author = {Caterina Donati and Carlo Cecchetto} } @conference {5151, title = {An aspectual survey of French 2nd group verbs as an inflectional \& lexical class}, year = {2016}, month = {06/2016}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Caen}, author = {Patrick Caudal} } @conference {5638, title = {At the crossroads between (semi-)free relatives and indirect questions in French}, year = {2016}, address = {Universit{\'e} Goethe, Francfort}, author = {Ingrid Konrad} } @conference {5882, title = {CBFC : un corpus bilangue franco-cor{\'e}en d{\textquoteright}apprenants de langue seconde}, year = {2016}, month = {10/2016}, author = {Hiyon Yoo and Kim, I and Kim, J.-O. and Guillaume Fon Sing and {\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie} } @conference {5242, title = {Clitic pronouns in Archaic Chinese}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, address = {University of York }, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan and Paul, Waltraud and Djamouri, Redouane} } @conference {4785, title = {A cognitively plausible model for anaphora resolution}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, address = {Bilbao}, abstract = {

Anaphora resolution a is complex problem, as it deals with syntax, semantics and discourse. The subject is well studied in field of psycholinguistics, where multiple preferences were discovered, and in the field of computational linguistics, where many systems have been developed to perform anaphora resolution in documents. Nevertheless, the work done in the two fields remains disconnected.\ 

We investigate how we can bridge the gap by exploiting the options for making a cognitively plausible model for anaphora resolution. Such model can be beneficent for both fields as it can inspire computational linguistics with findings about how humans process anaphora, and help the psycholinguistic community developing large coverage, incremental models simulating the human processing of anaphora.\ 

Inspired by the surprisal framework that uses incremental probabilistic parsing to predict processing cost coming from syntax for each word in a corpus, we focus on incremental probabilistic systems of anaphora resolution from the field of computational linguistics, for example the largely spread pair-wise model, and turn them into a cognitive model of processing of anaphora. We will present some preliminary results on the measures of processing cost of anaphora we developed and the perspective of evaluating the model on eye-tracking data.\ 

}, author = {Olga Seminck and Pascal Amsili} } @conference {4733, title = {Competition in derivation: what can we learn from doublets?}, year = {2016}, month = {02/2016}, address = {Vienna}, author = {Fradin, Bernard} } @conference {4718, title = {Competition of linear and structural distance in relative clause processing - Evidence from Mandarin and Cantonese Visual World experiments}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, abstract = {

RC processing confronts three major theories: linear distance theories versus frequency/structure based theories. Languages such as English don\&$\#$39;t allow to decide between them since all predict a Subject Relative preference, while linear distance predicts an Object Relative preference for Mandarin.\ 
In three VW-Eye-Tracking experiments we found a slight but not robust SR preference consistent with the proposition that RC processing involves a competition between linear distance and frequency/structure based factors. Cantonese has prenominal RCs as Mandarin but is different in that it has two major RC-types: one similar to Mandarin with a relativizer (ge3), and one without relativizer. It has been argued that linear distance doesn\&$\#$39;t play a role in structures without relativizer which may be analysed as adjoined. For Cantonese, RCs with relativizer show a slight (marginal) SR preference, however for RCs without relativizer, there is a strong (significant) advantage for SRs. Moreover, RCs without relativizer are generally easier to process than RCs with relativizer. Since for RCs without relativizer only frequency/structure based factors should be at work, the significant SR advantage is predicted, and so is the lack of difference between SRs and ORs in RCs with relativizer, in which the factors are in competition.

}, author = {Pozniak, Celine and Jiaying Huang and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5874, title = {The complement structure of causative constructions in French}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, address = {University of Naples Federico II}, author = {Xiaoshi Hu} } @conference {4816, title = {A comprehensive view on inflectional classification}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, address = {York}, author = {Sacha Beniamine and Olivier Bonami} } @conference {5526, title = {Coptic Linguistics 2012{\textendash}2016, keynote address}, year = {2016}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {4903, title = {Correlative coordinations {\textquotedblleft}y{\`o}u{\textellipsis}y{\`o}u{\textellipsis}{\textquotedblright} and {\textquotedblleft}y{\`o}ush{\`\i}{\textellipsis}y{\`o}ush{\`\i}{\textellipsis}{\textquotedblright} in Chinese}, year = {2016}, month = {07/2016}, author = {Ting-shiu Lin} } @conference {4728, title = {Denominal Adjectives with an Essive Interpretation}, year = {2016}, month = {08/2016}, address = {Naples, Italy}, author = {Fradin, Bernard} } @conference {4803, title = {Derivational paradigms: pushing the analogy}, year = {2016}, month = {08/2016}, address = {Naples}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Jana Strnadov{\'a}} } @conference {5444, title = {Description et analyse des expressions verbales fig{\'e}es en cr{\'e}ole et en fran{\c c}ais r{\'e}gional de l{\textquoteright}Ile Maurice}, year = {2016}, month = {11/2016}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {5065, title = {Description et analyse des expressions verbales fig{\'e}es en cr{\'e}ole et en fran{\c c}ais r{\'e}gional de l{\textquoteright}Ile Maurice}, year = {2016}, month = {20-22 June 2016}, publisher = {Queen{\textquoteright}s University}, address = {Belfast, UK}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {5532, title = {Diagnosing phase boundaries in participial relative clauses}, year = {2016}, month = {12/2016}, address = {KU Leuven (Brussels)}, author = {Chris Reintges and Caterina Donati} } @conference {4706, title = {Diagnosing the internal structure of French causatives}, year = {2016}, month = {04/2016}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Nantes}, abstract = {

}, author = {Xiaoshi Hu} } @conference {5527, title = {Die allomorphischen Varianten des sdm.t(j)=f Passivums mit besonderer Ber{\"u}cksichtigung der fr{\"u}hmittel{\"a}gyptischen Sargtexte,}, year = {2016}, address = {Berlin: Berliner-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften }, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {simonenko:hal-01365263, title = {Effects of literary form on grammatical changes: A treebank study}, year = {2016}, address = {Naples, Italy}, url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01365263}, author = {Simonenko, Alexandra and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e} and Sophie Pr{\'e}vost} } @conference {5871, title = {An "Element Theory" representation of Southern Saami "additional consonants"}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, address = {Naples}, author = {Guillaume Enguehard} } @conference {4713, title = {Ellipsis with garden-path antecedents in French}, year = {2016}, month = {03/2016}, abstract = {

Ellipsis with garden-path antecedents in French

Dario Paape, Shravan Vasishth (Univ. of Potsdam) \& Barbara Hemforth (Univ. Paris Diderot)

paape@uni-potsdam.de

Ellipsis is typically anaphoric, and its interpretation requires access to a suitable antecedent. Adopting the framework of cue-based retrieval parsing (Lewis \& Vasishth, 2005), Paape (2015) suggests that the syntactic structures of ellipsis antecedents are stored in working memory as chunks whose activation levels fluctuate over time. Cue-based retrieval parsing predicts that manipulating memory chunks increases their activation, making them easier to retrieve.

It should be possible to boost the activation of a stored antecedent through syntactic reanalysis, which changes the structure of the chunk and thereby \&$\#$39;refreshes\&$\#$39; its memory trace. In a self-paced reading study on German sluicing, Paape (2015) found that antecedents that had been reanalyzed (i.e., garden-path antecedents) led to reduced reading times at the ellipsis site, indicating facilitated retrieval and thus supporting the reactivation hypothesis.

In the current study, we attempted to replicate Paape\&$\#$39;s (2015) finding using eye-tracking, which more closely resembles natural reading. We tested French sentences containing sluicing constructions with temporarily ambiguous antecedents, as shown below.

Our design used a sequence of three lexically ambiguous words. Here, the word sale is ambiguous between the third person singular form of saler, \&$\#$39;to salt\&$\#$39;, and the adjective \&$\#$39;filthy\&$\#$39;. The word les is either a plural-marked definite article or an object pronoun. Finally, tranche could be a singular noun (\&$\#$39;slice\&$\#$39;), but would need an -s suffix to be compatible with the would-be article les to yield the reading \&$\#$39;The butcher/s salt/s the slices\&$\#$39;. The word tranche is thus the point of disambiguation in the ambiguous conditions, where no other morphological markers signal the correct parse. In a pretest, acceptability ratings were lower for ambiguous antecedent clauses than for unambiguous ones, which we took to indicate a garden-path effect. The main experiment used a 2\×2 design with the factors ambiguity (yes/no) and ellipsis (yes/no). The two control conditions used non-ellipsis anaphors (en, \&$\#$39;of it\&$\#$39;, in the above example). According to the reactivation hypothesis, processing at the ellipsis site (quand, \&$\#$39;when\&$\#$39;) should be less difficult in the ambiguous condition, where the antecedent has to be reanalyzed at tranche, \&$\#$39;cut\&$\#$39;.

At the sluicing site, antecedent ambiguity led to higher total reading times (t = 3.2) and marginally higher regression path durations (t = 1.9) only for ellipsis sentences, contrary to what the reactivation hypothesis predicted. This pattern was not observed in the region right before the ellipsis, excluding differential processing spillover as an explanation. An analysis of fixations made after the ellipsis site had been fixated revealed an effect of ambiguity on re-reading times for the antecedent region (t = 2.2), as well as higher re-reading probabilities for the initial noun phrase (z = 2.6) and the adjective (z = 2.3) in the ambiguous/ellipsis condition only.

Our study yielded no evidence for a reactivation advantage due to reanalysis. The increased re-reading time on the antecedent suggests that subjects did not always resolve the ambiguity in the initial clause - a type of good-enough processing (e.g. Ferreira \& Patson, 2007). On such trials, no fully interpreted antecedent will be available upon encountering the ellipsis site, leading to processing difficulty and re-reading of the antecedent clause.\ 

}, author = {Paape, Dario and Vasishth, Shravan and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {4719, title = {Ellipsis with garden-path antecedents in French}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, abstract = {

In a self-paced reading study on German sluicing, Paape (2015) found that antecedents that had been reanalyzed (i.e., garden-path antecedents) led to reduced reading times at the ellipsis site. Adopting the parsing framework of Lewis \& Vasishth (2005), Paape suggests that ellipsis antecedents are stored in working memory as chunks. Reanalysis increases a chunk\&$\#$39;s activation level, making it easier to retrieve.\ 
We attempted to replicate Paape\&$\#$39;s (2015) finding using eye-tracking. The experiment used French sentences in a 2\×2 design with the factors antecedent ambiguity (yes/no) and ellipsis (yes/no). If reactivation takes place, ellipsis should be less difficult to process in the ambiguous condition, where the antecedent has been reanalyzed.\ 
At the sluicing site, antecedent ambiguity led to higher total reading times and marginally higher regression path durations only for ellipsis sentences, contrary to what reactivation would predict. An analysis of fixations made after the ellipsis site had been fixated also revealed that subjects re-read the antecedent more often in the ambiguous conditions.\ 
We found no evidence of a reactivation advantage due to reanalysis. Instead, our results suggest that subjects did not always resolve the ambiguity in the initial clause - a type of good-enough processing (e.g. Ferreira \& Patson, 2007).

}, author = {Paape, Dario and Barbara Hemforth and Vasishth, Shravan} } @conference {5020, title = {Fradin Bernard. 2016. "Sound denoting verbs and their nominalizations". Paper read at Chronos 2016, 2016, at Caen.}, year = {2016}, author = {Fradin, Bernard} } @conference {4720, title = {French object relatives: all is good when the context is right}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, abstract = {

In experiments and corpus studies, we compared two types of French Object Relatives: with preverbal subject (le livre que Paul lit, \&$\#$39;the book that Paul reads\&$\#$39;) and with inverted subject (le livre que lit Paul). The linear distance hypothesis predicts the latter should be easier to process. However, in a Visual World experiment using reversible RCs with agentive verbs, we found the former to be easier.\ 
In a corpus study, we looked at general frequency of OR-types, verb semantics (+/- agentive), relative length of subject and verb in number of syllables, and the number of arguments in the OR. Logistic regressions show that the two ORs don\&$\#$39;t differ significantly in frequency, excluding a frequency-based explanation. Inverted ORs are actually preferred when the subject is longer, and the verb shorter with a non agentive meaning. Our findings showed that general frequency cannot be the factor explaining the use of the two ORs, but that verb semantics and length play a role. This means that the two ORs are not just alternatives but used in specific syntactic/semantic conditions. An acceptability judgement experiment confirmed that inverted ORs can be preferred over non-inverted ORs when the subject is longer and the verb non agentive.

}, author = {Pozniak, Celine and Barbara Hemforth and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {4710, title = {French object relatives: evidence against DLT but not entirely explained by frequency}, year = {2016}, month = {03/2016}, abstract = {

French object relatives: evidence against DLT but not entirely explained by frequency

C{\'e}line Pozniak, Barbara Hemforth \& Anne Abeill{\'e} (LLF, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Diderot, Labex EFL)

celine.pozniak@gmail.com

The literature in relative clause processing mainly presents differences between subject and object relative clauses (SRs and ORs). In our study, we will also compare two constructions for ORs: one with preverbal subject (ORsnoinv) and one with postverbal subject (ORsinv). Inversion is only possible with nominal subjects, not with pronominal subjects.

(1) OR with preverbal subject
Le m{\'e}decin que l\&$\#$39;avocat voit ___.

The doctor thatobj the lawyersubj sees.
Example (1) shows that the linear distance is shorter in ORsinv , so it should be easier to process than

ORsnoinv according to the Dependency Locality Theory, now DLT (Gibson, 2000).
Study 1 We designed an experiment to test linear distance-based theories in French in contexts with

high anticipation of restrictive relative clauses.
Experiment We ran a Visual World Eye-Tracking experiment (5 items per condition) with 32

native French speakers. We tested reversible SRs, ORsnoinv, ORsinv (1-3). The participants listened to a sentence while viewing 2 pictures with the same 3 characters each performing different actions. They had to find the correct picture according to the sentence. One picture was only compatible with an SR interpretation, the other one only with an OR interpretation.

Results Mixed linear models showed a significant SR advantage over the two ORs (ps\<.01). Participants looked at the right picture in later time windows for ORinv than for ORnoninv (ps\<.01), against linear distance accounts. These results seem, however, to go against the intuition that ORinv are relatively frequent in French, but possibly only under specific conditions.

Study 2 We therefore ran a corpus study using the French Treebank (Abeill{\'e} et al, 2003) to analyze factors for facilitating inverted and non-inverted RCs.

Corpus study We analyzed a corpus of the two ORs by looking at the semantics of the verb (+/- agentive), the length of the subject and the verb in number of syllables, and the number of arguments in the relative. We analyzed the role of these factors for the choice of the order in the relative using logistic regression models.

Results Logistic regressions show that the two ORs don\’t differ significantly in frequency, excluding a simple frequency-based explanation (94 ORsnoinv and 90 ORsinv). However, ORsinv are actually preferred over ORsnoinv when the subject is longer, and the verb is shorter and has a non agentive meaning (ps\< .01).

Conclusion In our Eye-Tracking experiment, ORsinv were harder to process than ORsnoinv, contradicting the DLT. However, the corpus study showed that general frequency cannot be the factor explaining this contrast. The verb semantics and the length of the subject and verb play a role in the choice of relative. This means that ORsnoinv and ORsinv are not just alternatives but used in specific contexts. The context in the experiment disfavored the use of ORsinv because of the use of agentive verbs. In the right context, ORsinv should even be preferred and acceptability judgment studies on this matter are currently on the way. Our results are highly compatible with semantic/pragmatic accounts in relative clause processing (Mak et al, 2006; Traxler et al, 2002).\ 

}, author = {Pozniak, Celine and Barbara Hemforth and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {4815, title = {Generalizing patterns in Instrumented Item-and-Pattern Morphology}, year = {2016}, month = {05/2016}, address = {Paris}, author = {Sacha Beniamine and Olivier Bonami} } @conference {4721, title = {How to investigate stigmatized constructions in French?}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, abstract = {

It is widely known that some constructions like left-dislocation (Les gateaux, je les ai mang\és / The biscuits, I ate them.), though widespread in spoken corpora are marked in standard written French. Acceptability judgment experiments in written context show stigmatization compared to other pragmatically marked constructions (e.g. clefts), even in felicitous contexts. We replicated those experiments using spoken sentences, and a written speeded grammaticality judgment paradigm.\ 
In spoken French we did not find any differences to the previous experiments. Even with the right prosody, left-dislocations are judged significantly less acceptable than clefts in their respective felicitous contexts. The task demands seem to encourage metalinguistic judgments based on sociolinguistic parameters.\ 
Speeded grammaticality judgments (SGJ), however, show equally high acceptability rates for left-dislocations and clefts. Ungrammatical clefts with clitics, on the other hand, are judged strongly unacceptable while pragmatically odd left-dislocations without clitics are judged moderately acceptable. This is coherent with gradient acceptability accounts where clefts with clitics are ungrammatical syntax wise (hard constraint) and left-dislocations without clitics are possible grammatically, but need a salient alternative to be felicitous (soft constraint).\ 
This series of experiments shows that challenging tasks like SGJ provide results closer to the actual usage of stigmatized constructions.

}, author = {Etienne Riou and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {4722, title = {How to turn Brazilians into Europeans: Global and local exposure effects on co-reference in European (EP) and Brazilian (BP) Portuguese}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, abstract = {

Co-reference is affected by the availability of pronominal forms in the language, but the interaction of language-based (global) exposure and (local) exposure, e.g., during experiments, is still unclear. We addressed this issue in questionnaires with Overt and Null pronouns in Portuguese sentences like The photographer greeted the journalist when he/\Ø finished?, where he/\Ø referred to either ?photographer? (Subject) or ?journalist? (Object).\ 
While EP keeps a symmetrical distribution of Null and Overt forms, BP seems to be losing the Null forms. This would explain why EP shows the traditional ?division of labour? (Null retrieving Subject/ Overt retrieving Object) whereas BP shows no preference for Overt forms. If the processor is sensitive to pronouns? availability, skewing local exposure towards Null forms should elicit in BP the EP pattern. We created two Exposure conditions (50\%/50\%, 75\%/25\%) varying the relative amount of Null and Overt Pronouns. A significant interaction Pronoun:Exposure for BP confirmed our prediction: while Subject and Object were equally selected as the antecedent of the Overt pronoun in the 50/50 condition, choices for Subject and Object in the 75/25 condition were 30\% and 70\%, approaching the EP pattern. Our results indicate adaptation to the local statistical environment.

}, author = {Eunice Fernandes and Paula Luegi and Eduardo Correa Soares and Israel de la Fuente and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5047, title = {A HPSG analysis of non-sentential coordination with he/gen/yu/ji/tong in Mandarin Chinese }, year = {2016}, author = {Aixiu An} } @conference {5536, title = {Il n{\textquoteright}y a pas trente-six fa{\c c}ons of building an NP structure}, year = {2016}, month = {04/2016}, author = {Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati} } @conference {5192, title = {Intonation of Alternative Constructions in French: What is crucial to interpret utterances as a question?}, year = {2016}, month = {12/2016}, address = {Francfort, Allemagne}, author = {{\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie and Giuseppina Turco} } @conference {5094, title = {La frase averbal en espa{\~n}ol oral. Sintaxis y pragm{\'a}tica }, year = {2016}, month = {06/2016}, address = {Universit{\'e} d{\textquoteright}Alcala de Henares}, author = {Oscar Garcia-Marchena} } @conference {5295, title = {La variation comme cons{\'e}quence du contact : le cas du truku (Taiwan)}, year = {2016}, month = {06/2016}, address = {Paris: INaLCO}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {5045, title = {Le comparatif de haut degr{\'e} : {\'e}tudes exp{\'e}rimentales en fran{\c c}ais et en mauricien}, year = {2016}, address = {University Paris 7, France}, author = {Shrita Hassamal and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {5445, title = {Le factitif dans les cr{\'e}oles de l{\textquoteright}Oc{\'e}an Indien.}, year = {2016}, month = {11/2016}, author = {Sybille Kriegel and Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {5857, title = {Learning left-dislocation in French : between pragmatics and sociolinguistics}, year = {2016}, author = {Etienne Riou and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5878, title = {Learning left-dislocation in French: between pragmatics and sociolinguistics}, year = {2016}, month = {08/2016}, address = {Jyv{\"a}skyl{\"a}}, author = {Etienne Riou and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5812, title = {Left and right dislocation across bridging types}, year = {2016}, address = {Frankfurt am Main, Allemagne}, author = {Brunetti, Lisa and Mayol, Laia and Villalba, Xavier} } @conference {4711, title = {Length effects in an OV language with Differential Object Marking and mixed head direction}, year = {2016}, month = {03/2016}, abstract = {

Length effects in an OV language with Differential Object Marking and mixed head direction
Pegah Faghiri (Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3), Barbara Hemforth (CNRS/Paris-Diderot) \& Pollet Samvelian (Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3)

pegah.faghiri@univ-paris3.fr
The \“long-before-short\” (LbS) preference observed in SOV languages, e.g. Japanese, Persian

and Basque, challenges the universality of availability-based theories of word order preferences supported by incremental models of speech production, put forward to account for the \“end-weight\” preference observed namely in German and English. Based on data from Japanese, Yamashita \& Chang (2001) propose a unified but language-specific accessibility-based account for both preferences. Their rationale is that 1) longer constituents are lexically richer and hence more salient than shorter ones, while being more costly to process and plan; 2) language-specific properties may modulate the sensitivity of a production system to conceptual vs. formal factors. With respect to word order, Japanese speakers focus more on conveying meaning than on sequencing forms, contrary to e.g. English speakers, given that Japanese has fewer syntactic constrains (e.g. flexible word order \& null pronouns) and that the shift does not occur in the postverbal domain where the verb is shown to exert strong influence.

Recent studies Japanese (Tanaka et al. 2011) and Basque (Ros et al. 2015) reject a conceptual account of LbS in favor of Hawkins\’ dependency-based distance-minimizing model (1994, 2004), which predicts mirror-image preferences in (strictly) VO and OV languages. Contributing to this discussion, we provide data on Persian, another SOV language with flexible word order and null pronouns, but head-initial in NP, PP and CP. Persian has verbal agreement with subject and Differential Object Marking (realized by =r ) triggered by definiteness.

Previous corpus and experimental studies on the relative order between the DO and the IO in the preverbal domain (Faghiri \& Samvelian 2014, Faghiri et al. 2014) have found a clear LbS preference, not predicted by Hawkins\’ model (due to Persian\’s mixed head direction). Moreover, they show that the effect of length depends on the degree of determination (or definiteness) of the DO: r - marked (definite) DOs prefer OD-OI-V regardless of length, (existential) indefinite DOs prefer OD-OI- V even more with OD\≥IO, and bare DOs show a less strong preference for OI-OD-V with OD\≥IO. It is argued that these preferences conform to the conceptual account, given that the fact that the effect of length and definiteness converge.

Our data on the relative order between the subject and the DO support these results. Firstly, our corpus data reveal that the degree of definiteness of the DO remains highly relevant: only r - marked DOs occur in OSV order (at the overall rate of 4.6\%). Secondly, we manipulated the relative length and animacy (of the subject) following a 2x2 design in a controlled experiment with r -marked animate DOs (20 items, ex.1), using a web-based sentence completion questionnaire (56 participants). We found (cf. Fig.1) a highly significant effect of animacy (p\<.001), OSV order was more frequent (12\% vs. 4.4\%) for inanimate subjects (1b) than for animate ones (1a), but no effect of length contrary to dependency-based length-minimizing accounts predictions (e.g. Gibson 2000, Hawkins 2004). Meanwhile, the conceptual hypothesis can provide a satisfactory account of these preferences: 1) animacy is a known conceptual factor to influence ordering preferences (e.g. Branigan \& Feleki 1999, Kempen \& Harbusch 2004, Branigan et al. 2008); 2) it is highly likely that the joint effect of definiteness and animacy undermines the
contribution of length to the conceptual
accessibility of the DO.

}, author = {Pegah Faghiri and Barbara Hemforth and Samvelian, Pollet} } @conference {5049, title = {Les contraintes d{\textquoteright}ordre de la coordination naturelle en fran{\c c}ais }, year = {2016}, author = {Aixiu An} } @conference {4999, title = {Les relatives libres objet en fran{\c c}ais : des structures agrammaticales ?}, year = {2016}, month = {04/2016}, address = {Bordeaux}, abstract = {

1. Les relatives objet chez l\’enfant et chez l\’adulte De nombreuses \études en acquisition ont mis en \évidence des asym\étries entre les relatives sujet et les relatives objet, ces derni\ères \étant plus difficiles \à acqu\érir pour les enfants et ce, jusqu\’\à l\’\âge de 5 ans (cf. (1)). Cela a \ét\é montr\é dans plusieurs langues telles que l\’h\ébreu, le portugais, l\’italien ou le fran\çais (Friedmann, Belletti \& Rizzi, 2009 ; Costa, Grillo \& Lobo, 2012 ; Guasti \& Cardinaletti, 2003 ; Fragman, 2000, entre autres). R\écemment, Friedmann et al. (2009) ont postul\é que cette difficult\é \était s\élective, dans le cadre de la Minimalit\é Relativis\ée. Les relatives objet qui posent probl\ème aux enfants, \à la fois en production et en compr\éhension, sont les configurations dans lesquelles l\’objet d\éplac\é, contenant une restriction lexicale (un trait +NP), croise un sujet de m\ême nature, c\’est-\à-dire contenant lui aussi une restriction lexicale (cf. (2)). Le sujet agit ainsi comme un intervenant et bloque la relation de d\épendance entre la trace du mouvement et la position cible. Cette configuration d\’inclusion, en termes de traits, n\’est probl\ématique que dans le syst\ème de l\’enfant, mais pas dans la grammaire adulte.
(1) a. Relative sujet : Le prince qui ___ regarde la princesse
\  \  \ b. Relative objet : Le prince que la princesse regarde ___
(2) L\’infirmi\ère que les policiers suivent ___ (difficile pour les enfants)
\  \  [+NP, +Rel] \  \  \  \  \  [+NP]
\  \ L\’objectif de ce papier est de montrer que les adultes aussi ont des difficult\és \à traiter certaines relatives objet : les relatives libres (cf. (3)). Pour ce faire, je vais pr\ésenter deux exp\ériences que j\’ai men\ées, ainsi que leurs r\ésultats.
(3) Qui la princesse regarde ___


2. Exp\érience 1 : test de jugement d\’acceptabilit\é Le test de jugement d\’acceptabilit\é que j\’ai mis en place souligne le caract\ère agrammatical des relatives libres objet. 93 locuteurs natifs ont jug\é plusieurs types de relatives, en attribuant une note entre 1 (mauvais) et 10 (bon) \à chaque phrase, qui \était introduite par un contexte (cf. (4) pour un exemple de contexte et de chaque type de structure). La note moyenne attribu\ée aux relatives libres objet \était tr\ès basse (3,54). Pourquoi les adultes fran\çais n\’acceptent-ils pas ces structures ? Ce qui est d\’autant plus int\éressant est que des structures homophones aux relatives libres, les questions ench\âss\ées (cf. (5)), utilis\ées comme fillers, ont \ét\é bien mieux jug\ées (6,20).
(4) Contexte : Un entretien d\’embauche collectif vient d\’avoir lieu au sein d\’une soci\ét\é. Quelques candidats se sont bien d\ébrouill\és et auront la chance de franchir l\’\étape suivante, \à savoir un entretien individuel.
1. Le recruteur choisira qui a bien parl\é. (relative libre sujet)
2. Le recruteur choisira ceux qui ont bien parl\é. (relative pronominale sujet)
3. Le recruteur choisira les candidats qui ont bien parl\é. (relative pleine sujet)
4. Le directeur contactera qui les recruteurs ont choisi. (relative libre objet)
5. Le directeur contactera ceux que le recruteur a choisis. (relative pronominale objet)
6. Le directeur contactera les candidats que le recruteur a choisis. (relative pleine objet)
(5) a. Question ench\âss\ée sujet : Le recruteur se demandera qui a bien parl\é.
b. Question ench\âss\ée objet : Le directeur ignore qui les recruteurs ont choisi.

\  \  Ces r\ésultats sugg\èrent que les relatives libres et les questions ench\âss\ées, qui sont pourtant deux instances de mouvement A-barre, n\’ob\éissent pas aux m\êmes contraintes. Dans ce papier, je vais \également discuter d\’une autre source d\’\évidence qui semble aller dans la direction suivante : les relatives libres objet sont agrammaticales en fran\çais.

3. Exp\érience 2 : test de jugement de valeur de v\érit\é Il existe des verbes, comme \« voir \» ou \« montrer \», qui peuvent s\électionner soit un DP soit un CP, autrement dit des verbes qui peuvent \être suivis soit par une relative libre soit par une question ench\âss\ée, qui sont les deux types de structures qui nous int\éressent ici. Dans ces cas d\’ambigu\ït\é, on peut se demander si l\’interpr\étation d\’une relative libre est disponible dans la grammaire des adultes ou bien si les adultes n\’ont que l\’interpr\étation d\’une question ench\âss\ée dans leur grammaire. Si les relatives libres objet sont agrammaticales en fran\çais - comme le sugg\ère l\’exp\érience 1 - on s\’attend \à ce que seulement l\’interpr\étation d\’une question ench\âss\ée soit disponible dans ces cas-l\à. Pour tenter de r\épondre \à cette question, je vais reporter les r\ésultats d\’une deuxi\ème exp\érimentation que j\’ai conduite sur des adultes locuteurs natifs du fran\çais. Il s\’agit d\’une t\âche de jugement de valeur de v\érit\é (Truth Value Jugment Task, bas\ée sur Clauss 2015), utilisant des phrases avec le verbe ambigu \« voir \». Pour chaque item, j\’ai fait varier le type de phrase (question ench\âss\ée introduite par la s\équence \« quel+NP \» (cf. (6)a. et (7) a.), relative pronominale (cf. (7) a. et (7)b.) et structure ambigu\ë introduite par \« qui \» (cf. (6)c. et (7)c.) et le type d\’histoire (histoire dans laquelle seulement l\’interpr\étation d\éfinie \– d\’une relative \– est vraie (cf. (6)) versus histoire dans laquelle l\’interpr\étation d\’une question ench\âss\ée est vraie (cf. (7))).
(6) Claire, L\éa, Samuel et Matthias discutent dans le salon. Pendant que Samuel va chercher de quoi boire dans la cuisine, Matthias embrasse L\éa par surprise. Quand Samuel revient, l\’atmosph\ère est tendue.
a. Samuel voit quelle fille Matthias a embrass\ée. VRAI ou FAUX ?
b. Samuel voit celle que Matthias a embrass\ée. VRAI ou FAUX ?
c. Samuel voit qui Matthias a embrass\é. VRAI ou FAUX ?
(7) Claire, L\éa, Samuel et Matthias discutent dans le salon. Samuel va chercher de quoi boire dans la cuisine. Quand il revient, il voit que Matthias est en train d\’embrasser L\éa.
a. Samuel voit quelle fille Matthias a embrass\ée. VRAI ou FAUX ?
b. Samuel voit celle que Matthias a embrass\ée. VRAI ou FAUX ?
c. Samuel voit qui Matthias a embrass\é. VRAI ou FAUX ?

\  \  \  L\’id\ée est la suivante : pour les histoires o\ù seulement l\’interpr\étation d\’une relative est vraie, si les participants r\épondent \« faux \» \à la phrase introduite par \« qui \», alors on peut en d\éduire que l\’interpr\étation d\’une relative libre n\’est pas disponible dans leur grammaire. Par contre, si pour ces m\êmes histoires, ils r\épondent \« vrai \» \à la phrase introduite par \« qui \», alors on peut en d\éduire que l\’interpr\étation d\’une relative libre est disponible dans leur grammaire, bien qu\’ils n\’acceptent pas ces structures. Les r\ésultats de cette deuxi\ème exp\érimentation sont en cours d\’analyse et je compte les discuter et faire porter l\’attention sur ce qu\’ils impliquent.

R\éf\érences
Clauss, M. (2015). Free relatives in acquisition: Mislabeling or Generalized Move-Wh rule ?. Papier pr\ésent\é \à GALA 12 (Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition), 10-12 septembre, Nantes.
Costa, J., N. Grillo \& M. Lobo (2012). Minimality beyond lexical restrictions: Processing and acquisition of free wh-dependencies in European Portuguese. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique LVII, 2: 143-160.
Fragman, C. (2000). Grammaire et pouvoir global de computation : deux sources de difficult\és possibles dans la production des relatives chez les enfants francophones. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 45(1/2): 7-48.
Friedmann, N., A. Belletti \& L. Rizzi (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119: 67-88.
Guasti, M.T. \& A. Cardinaletti (2003). Relative clause formation in Romance child\’s production. In: Probus n\°15. 47-89. Walter de Gruyter.

}, author = {Ingrid Konrad} } @conference {5877, title = {Lexical identity in VP ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese: an experimental approach}, year = {2016}, month = {06/2016}, address = {Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina)}, author = {Meiry Peruchi Mezari} } @conference {5150, title = {Linear Lengthening in Iwaidja: a prosodic countour with aspectuo-temporal meaning?}, year = {2016}, month = {06/2014}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Caen}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Mailhammer, Robert} } @conference {4712, title = {Mandarin relative clause processing or the joy of replication.}, year = {2016}, month = {03/2016}, abstract = {

Mandarin relative clause processing or the joy of replication.

C{\'e}line Pozniak, Barbara Hemforth (LLF, CNRS, Univ. Paris-Diderot, Labex EFL)

Celine.pozniak@gmail.com

Subject relative clauses (SRs) are considered as being easier to process than object relative clauses (ORs) cross-linguistically. However, Mandarin has been claimed to behave differently, since Hsiao \& Gibson (2003) found an OR advantage compatible with linear distance effects as predicted by the Dependency Locality Theory (DLT) (Gibson, 2000). Chen et al. (2011), however, found that SRs are easier to process in Mandarin, in line with frequency/structure based predictions. To explain these diverging results, Vasishth et al. (2013) suggested in a meta-analysis that there may actually be no significant difference at all or just a slight SR advantage possibly because the two effects (frequency/structure and linear distance effects) cancel each other out. Still, this meta-analysis included experiments with known methodological problems (such as contexts allowing for non-RC analysis). Thus, we ran a series of replication of experiments with different groups of participants to test the robustness of the preferences.

Our study We designed an experiment to test frequency/structure based versus linear distance based theories presenting RCs in contexts with very high anticipation of restrictive RCs. Experiments We ran a Visual World Eye-Tracking experiment (5 items per condition) with 41 native Mandarin Chinese speakers for Exp1, 23 native Mandarin Chinese speakers for Exp2 (both groups living in Paris) and 34 native Mandarin Chinese speakers in China (Nanjing) (Exp3). Exp1 and Exp2 were identical except for the speed of presentation of the auditory material. Presentation was slowed down in Exp1 in order to clearly capture fixation patterns. We sped up the presentation in Exp2 to enhance cognitive load. Exp2 and Exp3 were identical. We tested reversible SRs and ORs (1-2). Participants listened to a sentence while viewing a pair of pictures with the same three characters each performing different actions. The task was to find the correct picture corresponding to the sentence. One of the pictures was only compatible with an SR interpretation, the other one only with an OR interpretation.

Results Linear mixed models showed no significant difference between SRs and ORs in Exp1 (Figure 1), probably because of the reduced speed of the presentation. Increasing the speed in Exp2 (Figure 2) resulted in a significant SR advantage in Mandarin (ps\<.05) but not in Exp3 (Figure 3) where numeric but no significant difference could be established. Conclusion In a study with constraining context replicated three times, we find only a slight SR advantage when combining the results from the three experiments (Figure 4). We follow Vasishth et al. \‘s proposition that RCs processing involves a competition between frequency/structure and linear distance effects, which may cancel each other out. Our results do not show any evidence for an OR preference, disconfirming DLT. The lack of stability of preferences in Mandarin relative clause processing pertains even when using the same paradigm. This shows why it is so important in psycholinguistics to replicate experiments in order to test the robustness of the factors playing a role in sentence processing.

Back to Friday Poster Schedule

page153image25824 page153image25992

}, author = {Pozniak, Celine and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5157, title = {Motion serial verbs in Iwaidja: from event delimitation to discourse structural functions}, year = {2016}, month = {08/2016}, address = {Naples}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Mailhammer, Robert} } @conference {4745, title = {A Narrow Syntactic Account for Reconstruction Effects}, year = {2016}, month = {07/2016}, address = {Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {5048, title = {Non-sentential coordination with he/gen/yu/ji/tong in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2016}, author = {Aixiu An} } @conference {5586, title = {Overabundance as hybrid inflection: Quantitative evidence from {Czech}}, year = {2016}, address = {Manheim}, author = {Mat{\'\i}as Guzm{\'a}n Naranjo and Olivier Bonami} } @conference {5099, title = {Phrases averbales et fragments en espagnol oral}, year = {2016}, month = {Sous presse}, publisher = {Universit{\'e} Roma Sapienza}, address = {Rome}, author = {Oscar Garcia-Marchena} } @conference {5159, title = {Polyfunctionality vs. compositionality and the tense/aspect {\textendash} modality divide: descriptive, comparative/typological and theoretical issues}, year = {2016}, month = {11/2016}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris-Diderot}, author = {Patrick Caudal} } @conference {5836, title = {Positional competition in Chich{\^e}wa}, year = {2016}, month = {02/2016}, address = {Vienna}, author = {Berthold Crysmann} } @conference {5296, title = {Positional variation of the adjective in Truku, a consequence of language contact ?}, year = {2016}, month = {05/2016}, address = {Paris : Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {5848, title = {Processing unambiguous verbal passives in German}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2017}, abstract = {

We investigate the effect of event-structure on the processing of passivization in German. In contrastto English, German passives are unambiguously verbal or adjectival. This feature allows for the study of passivization independent of any (verbal/adjectival) ambiguity confound. Paolazzi et al. (2015 AMLaP, 2016 CUNY)showthat,contraryto broadlyheld theoreticalperspectives, passive sentences are not inherently harder to process than actives. Complexity of passivization in English is tied to the predicate event structure: with eventive predicates, passives are read faster (as previously observed in the literature) and generate no comprehension difficulties (contrary to previ ous findings with mixed predicates). Complexityeffectswith passivization areonly foundwith stative verbs. The asymmetry is claimed to stem from the adjectival/verbal ambiguity of stative passives, in English. We tested the account bylooking at the processing of unambiguous verbal-passives in German across two (event vs state) word-by-word non-cumulative self-paced-reading studies in a moving-window paradigm that manipulated syntax (active vs passive), with each sentence followed by a comprehension question. The predictionbeing thatwhen the adjectival reading is no longer available, the effects observed with English statives, should disappear. The results supported this prediction, both online and offline (active- stative: 87\%, passive-stative: 88.2\% correct).\ 

}, author = {Nino Grillo and Artemis Alexiadou and Berit Gehrke and Nils Hirsh and Caterina Paolazzi and Andrea Santi} } @conference {5869, title = {Prosodic phrasing in Moore}, year = {2016}, month = {03/2016}, address = {University of California (Berkeley, USA)}, author = {Compaor{\'e}, Laetitia} } @conference {5187, title = {Prosodic studies and interface phenomena : the case of topic phrases}, year = {2016}, month = {03/2016}, address = {Stuttgart}, author = {{\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie} } @conference {simonenko:hal-01353738, title = {{Quantificational dimension of Taraldsen{\textquoteright}s Generalisation}}, year = {2016}, address = {Ghent, Belgium}, url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01353738}, author = {Simonenko, Alexandra and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e} and Sophie Pr{\'e}vost} } @conference {4723, title = {Relative Clause-attachment in European (EP) and Brazilian Portuguese (BP): Effects of verb type, tense and variety}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, abstract = {

Pseudo-relative (PR) clauses have been argued to underlie high attachment (HA) preferences in RC-attachment ambiguities. PRs are possible with perception verbs which create the anticipation of a perceivable event. They demand the relative clause and the matrix clause being in the same time frame. Availability of PRs varies across languages but also across speakers of a language or language varieties. For BP as well as for EP evidence for basic attachment preferences is mixed as is evidence for the availability of PRs. Our questionnaire studies in BP and EP asked for attachment preferences in sentences like ?Maria saw/sees the daughter of the teacher who ran the marathon.?\ 

We varied verb-type (perception vs. stative verbs like lived-with) and tense-match between the RC-verb and the matrix verb. If the PR-reading is driving high attachment preferences, only perception verb sentences with matching tenses should boost HA. We found significant effects of variety (more HA for EP), verb-type (more HA for perception verbs across tense-match conditions), and a marginal (.08) interaction verb-type*tense. Across varieties, most HA were found for perception verbs with matching tense compatible with the PR-hypothesis. However, even for mismatching tense, perception verbs attracted more HA, suggesting a semantic effect beyond PR-availability.

}, author = {Eunice Fernandes and Paula Luegi and Eduardo Correa Soares and Israel de la Fuente and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {4727, title = {The role of individual empathic skills on the online processing of intonational meaning}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, abstract = {

The pragmatic meaning evoked by intonation is known to be processed online by listeners, but less is understood about which part of the contour triggers the meaning interpretation and how individual pragmatic abilities impact intonational processing. Here we investigate the role of empathy skills on the stability and timing of the intonation-meaning association, focusing on a French tune signaling contrast between the interlocutors? beliefs. Twenty-nine French speakers participated in a visual-world eye-tracking task in which a temporary lexical ambiguity could be resolved through intonation. Results showed, first, that low-empathy participants selected one (ultimately incorrect) interpretation during the pre-nuclear region of the contour (?=1.013, p\<.05), but participants with higher empathy did not (instead being less stable and considering both possible intonation-meaning associations) (?=-0.413, p=.42). Even when participants perceived clear disambiguating lexical cues, highly-empathic participants showed less strong intonation-meaning associations than less-empathic ones (?=-1.141, p\<.05 vs. ?=-1.441, p\<.001, respectively). Second, both groups used the nuclear pitch accent to start assigning the contrast meaning to the intonation contour, although they waited for the complete unfolding of the tune to interpret the contrast intonation. We propose that individual pragmatic variability needs to be taken into account when studying the processing of intonational meaning.

}, author = {Esteve-Gibert, Nuria and Cristel Portes and Shafer, Amy and Barbara Hemforth and D{\textquoteright}Imperio, Mariapaola} } @conference {4724, title = {Salience-based vs. exposure-based strategies in L2 pronoun resolution in French}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, abstract = {

We investigated pronoun resolution strategies in French native speakers and in German L2-learners of French. French and German differ in antecedent preferences in ambiguous constructions such as ?The postman hit the pirate before he went home?: while French shows a N2-preference, which is explained by the availability of a construction that unambiguously refers to N1, German, which does not have this alternative, shows a N1-preference.\ 
In questionnaires, we tested French active and passive sentences to investigate (a) whether the L2-learners would apply the same strategy as natives in the active condition (i.e. N2-preference), and (b) whether the explicit topicalization of a referent as a consequence of passivization influences interpretation preferences in both groups (resulting in more N1 choices).\ 
The results show that German learners continue to apply the L1 strategy in the L2, preferring the N1 significantly more often than the French natives in the active condition (57\% vs. 23\%). Crucially, the number of N1 choices increased significantly in both groups in the passive condition (74\% vs. 62\%). These results support salience-based strategies in L1 and L2 pronoun resolution and suggest that L2-learners might have difficulty acquiring strategies based on the frequency and availability of alternative constructions in the L2.

}, author = {Israel de la Fuente and Schimke, Sarah and Sascha Kuck and Barbara Hemforth and Colonna, Saveria} } @conference {5548, title = {The semantics of Implicit Causality: Missing explanations and more.}, year = {2016}, month = {10/2016}, url = {http://hpsl-linguistics.org/1203}, author = {Barbara Hemforth and Israel de la Fuente} } @conference {5856, title = {Sensibilisation aux constructions non-canoniques}, year = {2016}, author = {Etienne Riou and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5537, title = {The SignGram Blueprint: providing a tool for sign language grammar description }, year = {2016}, author = {Carlo Geraci and Josep Quer and Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati and Markus Steinbach} } @conference {5087, title = {Spanish Verbless Clauses and Fragments. A corpus analysis}, year = {2016}, month = {2016}, publisher = {Universit{\'e} de Malaga. 2016}, address = {Malaga}, author = {Oscar Garcia-Marchena} } @conference {5534, title = {Strong islands and cyclic transfer }, year = {2016}, month = {12/2016}, address = {Bruxelles}, author = {Caterina Donati and Carlo Cecchetto} } @conference {5312, title = {A survey on semantic productivity}, year = {2016}, address = {Trier}, author = {Lucie Barque and Doriane Gras} } @conference {5149, title = {The Tense/Aspect(-Modality) System of Anindhilyakwa: A Preliminary Reanalysis}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, address = {SOAS, University of London}, author = {Bednall, James and Patrick Caudal} } @conference {5298, title = {Is there a continuum from demonstrative to definite and beyond~? The case of nage 那個 in spoken discourse}, year = {2016}, month = {03/2016}, address = {Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {5642, title = {Time alignment between laughter and laughable}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, address = {Centre for Language Technology, University of Copenhagen}, author = {Chiara Mazzocconi and Ye Tian and Jonathan Ginzburg} } @conference {4725, title = {Topicality-based vs. exposure-based preferences in pronoun resolution in French: Evidence from questionnaires and eye-movements}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, abstract = {

It has been observed that in French sentences such as \&$\#$39;The facteur a appel\é le pirate avant qu\&$\#$39;il rentre \à la maison\&$\#$39; (\&$\#$39;The postman called the pirate before he went home\&$\#$39;), the N2 (the pirate) is strongly preferred as the antecedent of the ambiguous pronoun. This N2-preference in French has been explained by the fact that speakers take into account an alternative non-finite construction that is available in the language (\&$\#$39;avant de rentrer \à la maison\&$\#$39;, \&$\#$39;before going home\&$\#$39;) and that unambiguously refers to the N1.\ 
In a questionnaire and a Visual World eye-tracking experiment, we tested whether the explicit topicalization of the object by means of a passive construction (\&$\#$39;Le pirate a \ét\é appel\é par le facteur...\&$\#$39;) can change the N2-preference in favor of an N1-preference. Despite the fact that the non-finite construction is an unambiguous alternative for the active as well as the passive sentences, we observed a significant increase of N1-preferences in passive compared to active constructions in both the questionnaire (p\<.0001) and the Visual World experiment (p\<.01). These results suggest that pronoun interpretation preferences based on the frequency and availability of alternative constructions can be overridden when a referent is explicitly marked as the topic.

}, author = {Israel de la Fuente and Schimke, Sarah and Coralie Vincent and Barbara Hemforth and Colonna, Saveria} } @conference {5640, title = {Towards a Multi-layered Analysis of Laughter}, year = {2016}, month = {07/2016}, publisher = {Rutgers University}, address = {New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA}, author = {Chiara Mazzocconi and Ye Tian and Jonathan Ginzburg} } @conference {4802, title = {Underspecification in realisational morphology}, year = {2016}, month = {05/2016}, address = {Lyon}, author = {Berthold Crysmann and Olivier Bonami} } @conference {5155, title = {Unusual possibilities? Exploring the Jaminjung modal system}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, address = {EHESS, Paris}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Schultze-Berndt, Eva} } @conference {4864, title = {Utilisation d{\textquoteright}un format commun pour structurer les m{\'e}tadonn{\'e}es de corpus oraux : objectifs, enjeux et m{\'e}thode}, year = {2016}, address = {Poitiers, France}, keywords = {corpus langagiers, interop{\'e}rabilit{\'e}, m{\'e}tadonn{\'e}es, partage des donn{\'e}es, TEI}, url = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01357271}, author = {Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois and Etienne, C and Benzitoun, C and Chanard, C and Parisse, C} } @conference {5297, title = {Variation as a contact-induced phenomenon. The case of Truku (Taiwan)}, year = {2016}, month = {04/2016}, address = {Chiayi, Taiwan: National Chung-Cheng University}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {5443, title = {Vers une bi-grammaire fran{\c c}ais-cor{\'e}en. Comment exploiter un corpus bi-langue dans une optique didactique ? Retour sur les exp{\'e}rimentations de l{\textquoteright}OIF en Afrique et dans les zones cr{\'e}olophones}, year = {2016}, month = {10/2016}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {4726, title = {Voice mismatch in Right Node Raising: Evidence from acceptability judgments and an eyetracking reading experiment}, year = {2016}, month = {09/2016}, abstract = {

Voice mismatches may arise in VP ellipsis and Pseudogapping between source and target. No such mismatch has been reported for Right Node Raising (RNR).
However, French corpora provide many examples, where the shared participle must be interpreted as active (reflexive) and passive. Since RNR requires semantic contrast between the conjuncts, we conducted two experiments to test semantic (agent) contrast and syntactic (voice) match:\ 
+contrast/-match: Ce pharmacien doit des explications \à ceux qui se sont *ou qui ont \ét\é* mobilis\és pour lui. / This pharmacist owes explanations to those who themselves have or who have been mobilized for him.\ 
-contrast/-match: qu\&$\#$39;on a *ou qui ont \ét\é* / who one has or who have been\ 
+contrast/+match: qui se sont *ou qu\&$\#$39;on a* / who themselves have or who one has\ 
-contrast/+match: qui \étaient *ou qui ont \ét\é* / who were or who have been\ 
Acceptability judgements only showed a significant effect of contrast (p\<.01), not of match. In an eyetracking reading experiment, Gaze and Regression Path Durations show significant effects of semantic contrast in both voice match and mismatch sentences (critical zone between *) and no effect of match. Hence, given the appropriate semantics, voice mismatch is acceptable in RNR.

}, author = {Aoi Shiraishi and Barbara Hemforth and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {5074, title = {About some innovative features in Mauritian Creole}, year = {2015}, month = {22-23 June 2015}, address = {CLUL/FLUL, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {4876, title = {Acquisition de sch{\'e}mas variables par l{\textquoteright}enfant pr{\'e}-lecteur~: le cas du schwa des monosyllabes je et le}, year = {2015}, address = {Grenoble}, author = {Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois} } @conference {4874, title = {Acquisition des liaisons cat{\'e}goriques nominales et verbales : de la lexicalisation {\`a} l{\textquoteright}abstraction des constructions}, year = {2015}, author = {Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois} } @conference {4875, title = {Approche mixte et {\'e}tude des effets d{\textquoteright}input sur l{\textquoteright}{\'e}mergence de la variation phonologique}, year = {2015}, address = {Lyon}, author = {Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois} } @conference {5041, title = {A classification of adverbs in Mauritian}, year = {2015}, address = {Faculdade de Letras, Lisbon, Portugal}, author = {Shrita Hassamal} } @conference {4902, title = {Conjunctions of predicates and phrasal categories}, year = {2015}, month = {12/2015}, keywords = {conjunction, coordinate structure, syntax}, author = {Ting-shiu Lin} } @conference {4901, title = {Contraintes aspectuelles et interpr{\'e}tations temporelles de la construction de simultan{\'e}it{\'e} {\guillemotleft} y{\`\i}bi{\={a}}n{\textellipsis}y{\`\i}bi{\={a}}n{\textellipsis} {\guillemotright} en chinois contemporain}, year = {2015}, month = {07/2015}, abstract = {

\  \  \  Nous \étudions dans cet article les contraintes s\émantiques qui conditionnent l\’emploi de la construction de simultan\éit\é \«\ y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…\ \» en chinois mandarin. Nous montrons dans un premier temps qu\’un pr\édicat duratif et at\élique peut \être employ\é avec cette construction en fonction de son degr\é de dynamicit\é, que l\’acceptabilit\é d\’un pr\édicat non-duratif et t\élique d\épend en revanche du degr\é de contr\ôlabilit\é de celui-ci et enfin que le trait de durativit\é n\’a, lui, aucune cons\équence, contrairement aux affirmations de certains chercheurs. Nous expliquons dans un deuxi\ème temps que l\’emploi d\’un pr\édicat non-duratif et t\élique am\ène le plus souvent \à lier les actions d\écrites par les pr\édicats de la construction non plus par une relation de simultan\éit\é mais de cons\écutivit\é. Dans un troisi\ème temps, en comparant les cas o\ù les pr\édicats corr\él\és partagent ou non un m\ême sujet, nous concluons que les actions reli\ées par \«\ y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…\ \» doivent concerner un m\ême \év\ènement pour que la phrase soit grammaticale.

}, keywords = {aspect lexical, chinois, construction de simultan{\'e}it{\'e}, y{\`\i}bi{\={a}}n{\textellipsis}y{\`\i}bi{\={a}}n{\textellipsis}}, author = {Ting-shiu Lin} } @conference {4546, title = {Contrast markers in English and French}, year = {2015}, month = {09/2015}, address = {Malta}, author = {Lyn Frazier and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {4892, title = {Coordinate structure {\textquotedblleft}y{\`o}u{\textellipsis}y{\`o}u{\textellipsis}{\textquotedblright} in Mandarin Chinese: A semantic and syntactic analysis}, year = {2015}, month = {05/2015}, abstract = {

\  \  \  The structure \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” is generally thought to coordinate predicates of a same subject. It describes coexisting properties or indicates actions that occur in the same time frame, and their conjuncts must belong to the same semantic domain (1-a). However, these descriptions are insufficient. Semantically, they could not explain why (1-b) is inacceptable. Syntactically, coordination of predicates with different subjects is actually possible (2-a), while constraints on it need to be specified (2-b). After analyzing 2096 examples of \“y\òu\…y\òu\…,\” we propose that (i) conjuncts of \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” should agree on their aspectual features and that (ii) \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” may coordinate predicates with different subjects if these predicates do not form independent sentences. Semantically, \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” requires that aspectual features of their conjuncts be symmetrical; asymmetric combinations are either inacceptable or marked. When the structure coordinates dynamic predicates to indicate specific actions, the conjuncts must agree on their telicity (3-a, 3-b). When a stative predicate is coordinated with a dynamic one, the dynamic predicate should either have a habitual reading (3-c) or be marked by a perfective marker (3-d): the former strategy makes a dynamic situation stative, and the latter presents it as an indecomposable whole on the axis of time, which makes it possible to be viewed as a property of an individual. Syntactically, \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” may coordinate predicates with different subjects in two conditions: (i) the coordinated propositions are related to another proposition in the sentence to indicate the cause (4-a, 4-b); (ii) the coordinated propositions share a same topic and serve to describe its properties (2-a). In other words, \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” do not coordinate independent sentences (2-b). In the first condition, \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” coordinates two subordinate propositions. In the second, the topic can be analyzed as a subject and the coordinated propositions as its predicates. To sum up, conjuncts of \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” should not only belong to identical semantic domain but also have symmetric aspectual features. This structure may coordinate predicates with different subjects while it does not coordinate different sentences. Our findings complement the grammar of \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” described in existing literature and could be useful to the teaching of this structure.

(1) a. Xiǎom\íng \ \ y\òu\  \  \ xǐ \  \  wǎn \  / \  *xǐzǎo \  \  \ \ y\òu\  \  zu\ò \ wǎnf\àn.

\  \  \  \  \ Xiaoming \ again wash \ bowl\ / take-a-bath again make dinner

\  \  \  \  \ \‘Xiaoming both did the dishes/*took a shower and made the dinner.\’

\  \  \  b. ??Xiǎom\íng y\òu\  \  \  \  xǐ-hǎo \  wǎn \ \ y\òu\  \  zu\ò \ wǎnf\àn.

\  \  \  \  \ Xiaoming \  \  again wash-done bowl again make dinner

\  \  \  \  \ \‘Xiaoming both finished the dishes and made the dinner.\’

(2) a. (*Z\ài) zh\èi ji{\={a}} \  \ gongsi, \ chǎnpǐn y\òu\  \  \ hǎo / d\é-gu\ò jiǎng, \  \ f\úw\ù

\  \  \  \  \ at \  \  \  \ this Cl. company, product again good/get-Exp. price, service \ 

\  \  \  \  \ y\òu\ \ qinqi\è.

\  \  \  \  \ again friendly\ \ 

\  \  \  \  \ \‘The products of this company are good/have won a prize and its\ service

\  \  \  \  \ is nice.\’

\  \  \  b. (Z\ài) zh\èi ji{\={a}} gongsi, \  \  \  jinglǐ \  \ \ (*y\òu) \ guǎnlǐ \  lǎo k\èh\ù, yu\ángong

\  \  \  \  \  at \  \  \ this Cl. company, manager again manage old client, employee\ 

\  \  \  \  \  (*y\òu) \ k{\={a}}if{\={a}} \  \ \ xin \ k\èh\ù.

\  \  \  \  \  again develop new client

\  \  \  \  \ \ \‘In this company, the manager takes care of old clients and the

\  \  \  \  \  employees develop new ones.\’

(3) a. Xu\ésheng-men y\òu\  \ ting \  \  \ k\è \  \  \ y\òu\  \ xi{\v e}(-??xi\à) bǐj\ì.

\  \  \  \  \ student-Pl. \  \  \  again listen lesson again write-down note

\  \  \  \  \ \‘The students both listened to the lectures and wrote down some notes.\’

\  \  \  b. Xiǎom\íng y\òu\  \ ch\àng-le \  \  \ ge, \  \ y\òu\  \ ti\ào??(-le) \  \  wǔ.

\  \  \  \  \  Xiaoming again \ sing-Acp. song, again dance-Acp. dance

\  \  \  \  \  \‘Xiaoming both sang and danced.\’

\  \  \  c. T{\={a}} \  \ \ y\òu lǎndu\ò\ \ y\òu ??(sh\ích\áng) tou \ dongxi.

\  \  \  \  \  s/he again \ lazy \ again \  \  \  \  often \  \ steal \ thing

\  \  \  \  \  \‘S/he is lazy and often steals things.\’

\  \  \  d. Y\í \ ge \ \ y\òu\  \  \  ji\é*(-gu\ò/-le) \  \  \  hun \  \  \  \ y\òu\  \ yǒu \ h\áizi de n\ánr\én\…

\  \  \  \  \ one\ Cl. again marry-Exp./Acp. marriage again have child Rel. man

\  \  \  \  \ \‘a man who had a marriage and who has a kid\… / a man who is married

\  \  \  \  \ and has a kid\…\’

(4) a. L\óuti y\òu lǎoji\ù, X\ú t\àitai y\òu\  p\àng, ??(zǒu de zizigege \  y\í \ pi\àn xiǎng).

\  \  \  \  \ stair again old, \  Xu \ Mrs.\ again fat, \  \  \  walk DE creaking one Cl. sound

\  \  \  \  \ \‘The stairs were old and Mrs. Xu was fat. When she walked down, it

\  \  \  \  \ made creaking noises.\’

\  \  \  b. B\àba \ \ y\òu\  \  \ x\ù \  \  \  \ jiǔ \  \  / \ l\íji{\={a}}chuzǒu, \ m{\={a}}m{\={a}} \  \ y\òu\  \ sheng-le

\  \  \  \  \  father again abuse alcohol / leave-home, mother again \ catch-Acp.\ 

\  \  \  \  \  b\ìng, \  \  \ ?(wǒ zhen \ b\ù \  zhid\ào \  g{\={a}}i \  \ z{\v e}nme b\àn.)

\  \  \  \  \  sickness, \  \ I \  really Neg. know have-to \ how \  \ do

\  \  \  \  \  \‘Dad is alcoholic/has left home and Mom is sick, I really don\’t know what

\  \  \  \  \  to do.\’

}, keywords = {coordinate structures, syntax, {\textquotedblleft}y{\`o}u{\textellipsis}y{\`o}u{\textellipsis}, {\textquotedblright} semantics}, author = {Ting-shiu Lin} } @conference {5300, title = {Definiteness in the noun phrase. Realizations in first and second languages~}, year = {2015}, month = {06/2015}, address = {Paris : Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {5875, title = {Derivation of Deverbals in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2015}, month = {12/2015}, address = {University of Newcastle}, author = {Xiaoliang Huang} } @conference {5299, title = {Determiner doubling in Truku-Chinese mixed discourse. How variation in contact varieties licences double syntactic positions}, year = {2015}, month = {09/2015}, address = {CNRS Villejuif}, author = {Saillard, Claire and Nowbucyang, Lowking} } @conference {5097, title = {Ellipsis and fragments in spoken Spanish}, year = {2015}, month = {14 Juillet 2015}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot}, author = {Oscar Garcia-Marchena} } @conference {4873, title = {{\'E}volution des corpus de donn{\'e}es langagi{\`e}res en acquisition du langage~: interaction entre modernisation des m{\'e}thodes et revirements th{\'e}oriques}, year = {2015}, address = {Tours}, author = {Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois} } @conference {steinlin:hal-01178382, title = {FDTB1 : Identification of discourse connectives in a French corpus}, year = {2015}, month = {Jun}, address = {Caen, France}, keywords = {discourse annotation, discourse connectives, grammar and discourse}, url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01178382}, author = {Steinlin, Jacques and Margot Colinet and Danlos, Laurence} } @conference {5072, title = {Fixed Verbal Expressions in Mauritian Creole}, year = {2015}, month = {14-15 Dec 2015}, address = {University of Amsterdam, Holland}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {5872, title = {The French negative in- prefix: what assimilation tells us about structural attachment}, year = {2015}, month = {01/2015}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris-Diderot}, author = {Garet, Patty} } @conference {6806, title = {The French negative in- prefix: what assimilation tells us about structural attachment}, year = {2015}, month = {01/2015}, address = {Paris Diderot Paris 7}, author = {Garet, Patty} } @conference {5538, title = {Frequency of grammatical constructions and syntactic priming }, year = {2015}, month = {09/2015}, author = {Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati} } @conference {4348, title = {Gender in French: inflection or flexibility}, year = {2015}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Gilles Boy{\'e}} } @conference {4813, title = {Information-theoretic inflectional classification}, year = {2015}, month = {07/2015}, address = {Belgrade}, author = {Sacha Beniamine and Olivier Bonami and Beno{\^\i}t Sagot} } @conference {5144, title = {L{\textquoteright}interaction temps-aspect-modalit{\'e} en fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2015}, month = {09/2013}, address = {Universit{\'e} Ovidius, Constantza, Roumanie}, author = {Patrick Caudal} } @conference {4548, title = {L2 ambiguous pronoun resolution: the impact of L1-based preferences, L2-proficiency and working memory capacity}, year = {2015}, month = {05/2015}, address = {Rutgers}, author = {Schimke, Sarah and Colonna, Saveria and Israel de la Fuente and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5228, title = {A la d{\'e}couverte des langues cr{\'e}oles}, year = {2015}, month = {9-11 oct 2015}, address = {Cit{\'e} des sciences et de l{\textquoteright}Industrie, Paris}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing and Shrita Hassamal} } @conference {4707, title = {Le compl{\'e}ment des constructions causatives du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2015}, month = {09/2015}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris 7}, abstract = {

}, author = {Xiaoshi Hu} } @conference {5042, title = {Les adverbes comparatifs en mauricien. }, year = {2015}, address = {University Paris Diderot, France}, author = {Shrita Hassamal} } @conference {5146, title = {Les facteurs de choix de l{\textquoteright}auxiliaire en ancien fran{\c c}ais : {\'e}tude quantitative et comparative}, year = {2015}, month = {02/2015}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris 3 Sorbonne Nouvelle}, author = {Heather Burnett and Patrick Caudal and Michelle Troberg} } @conference {4985, title = {Merge and labeling in the language faculty}, year = {2015}, month = {11/2015}, address = {Trento. }, author = {Caterina Donati} } @conference {5885, title = {Mixed Categories in Hausa: Between Morphology, Syntax and Semantics}, year = {2015}, month = {06/2015}, author = {Berthold Crysmann} } @conference {5071, title = {Morphological and syntactical innovations in Mauritian Creole: exctraction and analysis from regional French data}, year = {2015}, month = {8-10 April 2015}, address = {Aarhus University, Denmark}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {6805, title = {A Neoconstructionist view of the French negative prefix in- {[ɛ̃], [i], [in]} and -able adjectives}, year = {2015}, month = {01/2015}, address = {Paris Diderot Paris 7}, url = {https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4w2tN6S5U-maWNBZjV1aG5HUms/view}, author = {Garet, Patty} } @conference {5004, title = {Object relative clauses: An unexpected difference between children and adults.}, year = {2015}, month = {09/2015}, address = {Nantes}, author = {Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati and Ingrid Konrad and Carla Soares-Jesel} } @conference {5005, title = {Object relative clauses: explaining an unexpected difference between children and adults.}, year = {2015}, month = {10/2015}, address = {Venise}, author = {Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati and Ingrid Konrad and Carla Soares-Jesel} } @conference {5098, title = {Phrases verbales et fragments en espagnol}, year = {2015}, month = {09/2015}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot}, author = {Oscar Garcia-Marchena} } @conference {4547, title = {Processing Mandarin relative clauses}, year = {2015}, month = {09/2015}, address = {Malta}, author = {Pozniak, Celine and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {4462, title = {Processing subject and object relative clauses in French and Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2015}, month = {03/2015}, address = {Los Angeles}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.1.1456.8481}, author = {Pozniak, Celine and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5863, title = {A propos de "non-savoir" du locuteur : {\'e}tude d{\textquoteright}"{\'e}ventuellement" et "le cas {\'e}ch{\'e}ant"}, year = {2015}, month = {05/2015}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Bucarest}, author = {Fumitake Ashino} } @conference {4464, title = {Pseudo relatives are easier than relative clauses: evidence from Tense}, year = {2015}, month = {03/2015}, address = {Los Angeles}, url = {http://dornsife.usc.edu/assets/sites/836/docs/CUNY_program_web_reduced_edits_sponsors.pdf}, author = {Nino Grillo and Barbara Hemforth and Pozniak, Celine and Andrea Santi} } @conference {4545, title = {Pseudo Relatives are easier than Relative Clauses: eyetracking evidence from tense}, year = {2015}, month = {09/2015}, address = {Malta}, author = {Nino Grillo and Barbara Hemforth and Pozniak, Celine and Andrea Santi} } @conference {5540, title = {Quattro passi into the NP structure }, year = {2015}, month = {06/2015}, author = {Caterina Donati and Carlo Cecchetto} } @conference {4397, title = {Questions at Syntax and Prosody Interfaces}, year = {2015}, month = {11/2015}, address = {UCLA, Los Angeles}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {5855, title = {Rapport entre didactique des langues et linguistique : le cas de la dislocation {\`a} gauche}, year = {2015}, author = {Etienne Riou and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5539, title = {A relabeling analysis of reduced relatives }, year = {2015}, month = {07/2015}, author = {Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati} } @conference {5052, title = {Right peripheral ellipsis in French : a corpus study}, year = {2015}, address = {Hong-Kong}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Aoi Shiraishi} } @conference {5837, title = {Rules of referral in Information-based Morphology}, year = {2015}, address = {Toulouse}, author = {Berthold Crysmann} } @conference {5867, title = {Schwas in Stressed Syllables: The case of French Rap and Reggae}, year = {2015}, month = {01/2015}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris-Diderot}, author = {Polina Chodakov{\'a}} } @conference {4814, title = {Segmentation strategies for inflection class inference}, year = {2015}, month = {12/2015}, address = {Toulouse}, author = {Sacha Beniamine and Olivier Bonami} } @conference {5864, title = {The Semitic Verb Template: a View from the Mehri Language of Oman}, year = {2015}, month = {01/2015}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris-Diderot}, author = {Sabrina Bendjaballah and S{\'e}g{\'e}ral, Philippe} } @conference {4463, title = {Sentence structure matters: A new account of intra-sentential pronoun resolution}, year = {2015}, month = {03/2015}, address = {Los Angeles}, doi = { 10.13140/RG.2.1.2505.4245}, author = {Israel de la Fuente and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {6123, title = {The Syntax of Quantity Expressions in Chinese}, year = {2015}, month = {12/2015}, abstract = {

}, author = {Xiaoshi Hu and Wei Xiang} } @conference {4900, title = {On the syntax of two correlative constructions in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2015}, month = {06/2015}, abstract = {

\  \  \  This paper investigates the syntactic structures of two correlative constructions in Mandarin: \“y\òu\… y\òu\…\” and \“y\ìbi{\={a}}n \… y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…\” Both of them correlate only predicates. \“Y\òu\… y\òu\…\” describes coexisting qualities of an entity (1-a) or actions occurring in the same time frame (1-b). \“Y\ìbi{\={a}}n \… y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…\” expresses the simultaneity of two actions (2).\ 

(1) a. y\òu\ \ \ \  \ m{\v e}il\ì\ \ \ \  y\òu\  \ congm\íng\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \ 

\  \  \  \  \ again beautiful again\ \  smart\ \ \ \ \ \  \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 

\  \  \  \  \ \‘beautiful and smart\’\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 

\  \  \ b. y\òu \ \ \ \ \ xǐ \  \  \  yifu\ \ \ \  \ y\òu \ \ \ \ zu\ò\ \  wǎnf\àn.

\  \  \  \  \ again wash clothes\  again\  make\  dinner

\  \  \  \  \ \‘do the laundry and make the dinner.\’

(2) y\ìbi{\={a}}n\  \  \  \ xǐ\ \ \ \ \  yifu \  \  \ y\ìbi{\={a}}n\  \  \ zu\ò\ \  wǎnf\àn.

\  \  \ one-side wash clothes one-side make \ dinner \ \ 

\  \  \ \‘make the dinner while doing the laundry.\’

\  \  \ \ These two constructions are considered coordinate structures in the literature (Chao, 1968; Zhang, 2008; Xing, 2003). Zhang (2008) further compares them to correlative coordinations in Germanic languages, arguing that the first correlator is a focus particle while the second one functions as a coordinator. Contrary to these views, we argue that while \“y\òu\… y\òu\…\” is indeed a coordination, \“y\ìbi{\={a}}n\… y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…\” is not. Moreover, the structure of \“y\òu\… y\òu\…\” is different from that of correlative coordinations in Germanic languages.

1. \“Y\òu\… y\òu\…\” constitutes coordinate structures while \“y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…\” forms adjunct-head relationships between the predicates that it connects.

\  \  \  No element can be extracted from either predicate in \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” sentences (3-a, 3-b, 4-a, 4-b) or from the first predicate of \“y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…\” (3-d, 4-d). However, extractions from the second predicate of \“y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…\” are allowed (3-c, 4-c). In addition, in some contexts, \“y\ìbi{\={a}}n Pred.1\” can appear before the subject (5) while no context allows \“y\òu Pred.1\” to move to the beginning of a sentence. In other words, \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” observes Coordinate Structure Constraint while \“y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…\” shows Adjunct Island effects.

(3) a. *Mǎl\ì \ \ y\òu\  \  \  \ xǐ \  \  \  yifu\ \  \  \ y\òu \ \ \ zu\ò \ \ ei\ \ \  de\ \ \  n\à\ \  \ d\ùn\ \  wǎnf\àni\…

\  \  \  \  \  Mary\  again\  wash clothes\  again\  make\ \ \ \ \  \ Rel. that \ \ Cl.\ \  \ dinner

\  \  \  b. *Mǎl\ì\  \ y\òu\  \  \  \ xǐ \ \ \ ei\ \ \  y\òu\  \  \ zu\ò\ \ \  wǎnf\àn\ \  de\ \ \  n\à\ \ \ \  xie\ \ \ \ \  yifui\…

\  \  \  \  \  Mary\  again\ \  wash\ \ \ \ \  again\  make\ \  dinner\  \ Rel. that\  some\  clothes

\  \  \ c. Mǎl\ì\ \  \ y\ìbi{\={a}}n\ \ \ \ \  \ xǐ\ \ \ \ \  yifu\ \ \ \ \  \ y\ìbi{\={a}}n\  \  \  zu\ò \ \ \ ei\ \  \ de\ \ \  n\à\ \  d\ùn

\  \  \  \  \ Mary one-side \ wash clothes\  one-side\  make \  \  \  \ Rel. \ that \ \ Cl. \ 

\  \  \  \  \ wǎnf\àni\…

\  \  \  \  \ dinner

\  \  \  \  \ \‘The dinner that Mary made while doing the laundry...\’

\  \  \  d. *Mǎl\ì \  \ y\ìbi{\={a}}n\  \  \  \ xǐ\ \ \  \ ei\  \ \ y\ìbi{\={a}}n\ \ \ \  zu\ò\ \  wǎnf\àn\ \  de\ \ \ \  n\à\  \ \ \ xie\ \ \ \ \ 

\  \  \  \  \  \ Mary \ one-side\  wash\ \ \  \ \ one-side \ make\  dinner\  \ Rel.\  that\  some \ 

\  \  \  \  \  \ yifui\…

\  \  \  \  \  \ clothes\ 

(4) a. *Jinti{\={a}}n\  de\  wǎnf\àni\  sh\ì \ \ Mǎl\ì\  \ \ y\òu \ \ \ \ xǐ\ \ \ \ \  yifu\ \ \ \ \ \  y\òu \ \ \ \ \ zu\ò \ \ ei\  de.

\  \  \  \  \ \ Today\  Gen.\  dinner\  \ be\ \  Mary\  again\ wash clothes\ \ again\ \  make \  \ \ DE

\  \  \  b. *Jinti{\={a}}n\  de\ \ \ \  yifui\ \  sh\ì\ \  Mǎl\ì \ \ \ y\òu \ \ \ \ \ \ xǐ \ \ \ ei\ \ y\òu \ \ \ zu\ò\ \ \  wǎnf\àn\  de.

\  \  \  \  \ Today \  \ Gen. clothes\ be\ \ Mary\ \ again\ \  wash\ \  \ again\  make\ \  dinner\  DE

\  \  \  c. Jinti{\={a}}n\ \ de\  \ wǎnf\àni\  \ sh\ì \ Mǎl\ì\  \ y\ìbi{\={a}}n \ \  \  \  xǐ\  \  \  \ yifu \  \  \ y\ìbi{\={a}}n\ \ 

\  \  \  \  \ Today \  Gen. \ dinner\ \  \ be \ Mary\ one-side\  wash clothes \ one-side

\  \  \  \  \ zu\ò\  \ ei\  \ de.

\  \  \  \  \ make \  \  \ DE

\  \  \  \  \ \‘Today\’s dinner was made by Mary while she did the laundry.\’

d. *Jinti{\={a}}n\  de\ \ \ \  yifui\ \  sh\ì\ \  Mǎl\ì\  \ \ y\ìbi{\={a}}n \ \ \ \  xǐ \ \ \ ei\ \ \  y\ìbi{\={a}}n \ \ \ zu\ò\ \ \ wǎnf\àn de.\ 

\  \  \ Today\  Gen. clothes\ be\  Mary\  one-side\ wash\ \ \ \ \ one-side\ make\  dinner DE

(5) Y\ìbi{\={a}}n \ \ \ zǒu, \ \ t{\={a}} \ y\ìbi{\={a}}n \ \ y\òng qu\án qing \ \ qi{\={a}}o \ \ z\ìjǐ \ \ de \ \ \ \ t\óu.

\  \  \ one-side walk, he one-side use\  \ fist \ lightly knock self Gen. head

\  \  \‘While walking, he gently knocked his head with a fist.\’ (Laoshe \“Looking at

\  \  Chang\’an\” )

2. \“Y\òu\… y\òu\…\” is a simple coordinate structure formed by two identical adverbs instead of a correlative coordination composed of a focus particle and a coordinator.

\  \  \  Unlike \“and\” or \“or,\” a single \“y\òu\” does not have the function of a coordinator. It is simply an adverb that marks the accumulation of events or properties (Biq, 1988). \“Y\òu\” can appear with both the conjunction \“\érqi{\v e}\” \‘and\’ (6-a) and the subordinator \“zhih\òu\” \‘after\’ (6-b), which shows that it constitutes neither coordinate nor subordinate relationships between the elements that it links. In contrast, \“and,\” as a coordinator, is not compatible with any subordinator (7), nor is \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” (6-c). In addition, the first \“y\òu\” of \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” should not be analyzed as a focus or restrictive particle such as \“even\” or \“only.\” The position of the first \“y\òu\” is rather fixed\— it should stays right in front of the first conjunct (8) and does not \“float\” as freely as \“both\” or \“either\” in correlative coordinations of Germanic languages (Johannessen, 2005; Zhang, 2008) (9). On the contrary, the restrictive adverb \“zhǐ\” \‘only\’ can appear at different preverbal positions and creates scope effects (10), just as \“only\” in English. \ 

(6) a. T{\={a}} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ xǐ-le \ \ \ \ \ \ wǎn, \ (\érqi{\v e}) y\òu \ \ \ tuo-le \ \ \ \ \ \ \ d\ì.

\  \  \  \  \ s/he wash-Acp. dishes,\  and\  again mop-Acp. floor

\  \  \  \  \ \‘S/he washed the dishes, and mopped the floor, too.\’

\  \  \  b. T{\={a}} \ \ \ \ \ \  \ xǐ-le \ \ \ \ \ \ wǎn \ (zhih\òu), y\òu \ \ \ \ tuo-le \ \ \ \ \ \ d\ì.

\  \  \  \  \  s/he wash-Acp. dishes\ \  after, \  again mop-Acp. floor

\  \  \  \  \  \‘After washing the dishes, s/he mopped the floor, too.\’

\  \  \  c. T{\={a}} \ \ \ \ \ \ y\òu\  \  \  \  xǐ-le \ \ \ \ \ \ wǎn (*zhih\òu), \ y\òu \ \ \ tuo-le \ \ \ \ \ \ \ d\ì.

\  \  \  \  \  s/he \  again wash-Acp. dishes\ \  after,\  \ again mop-Acp. floor

(7) (*After/*Before/*When) she washed the dishes and mopped the floor.

(8) a. T{\={a}} \ \ \ xiǎng y\òu\ \  \ k\àn \ \ \ \ di\ànsh\ì \ \ \ \ y\òu \ w\án \ y\óux\ì.

\  \  \  \  \  s/he want again watch television again play games

\  \  \  \  \  \‘S/he wants to watch TV and also play video games.\’

\  \  \  b. T{\={a}} \ \ \ \ y\òu \ \ xiǎng k\àn \ \ \ \ di\ànsh\ì \ \ \ \ y\òu *(xiǎng) w\án y\óux\ì.

\  \  \  \  \  s/he again want watch television again\ \  want\ \  play games

(9) Max wants to eat either grapes or cherries. / Max wants to either eat grapes or cherries. /

Max either wants to eat grapes, or cherries. (Examples from Zhang, 2008)

(10) a. T{\={a}} \ \ xiǎng \ zhǐ \ \ k\àn \ \ \ \ di\ànsh\ì.\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ b. T{\={a}}\ \ \  \ \ zhǐ \ \ xiǎng \ \ \ k\àn \ \ di\ànsh\ì.

\  \  \  \  \  \ s/he want \ only watch television \ \  \  \  \  \ s/he\ \  only\  want\ \  watch \  \ TV

\  \  \  \  \  \ \‘S/he wants to watch TV only.\’\ \ \ \ \ \  \  \  \ \ \‘S/he only wants to watch TV.\’

\  \  \  In conclusion, not all correlative constructions in Chinese are correlative coordinations similar to those in Germanic languages. \“Y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…y\ìbi{\={a}}n\…\” forms VP adjunctions, and \“y\òu\…y\òu\…\” is a simple coordinate structure made up of two identical adverbs. Our findings improve the current understandings of coordinate structures in Chinese.

References

Biq, Y.-O. (1988). From objectivity to subjectivity: The text-building function of you in Chinese. Studies in Language, 12(1), 99-122.

Chao, Y. R. (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

Johannessen, J. B. (2005). The syntax of correlative adverbs. Lingua, 115, 419-443.

邢福义 [Xing, Fu-Yi] (2001)。汉语复句研究 [Study on Complex Sentences of Mandarin Chinese]。北京:商务印书馆 [Peking: The Commercial Press]。

Zhang, N. N. (2008). Repetitive and correlative coordinators as focus particles parasitic on coordinators. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 21, 295-342.

}, author = {Ting-shiu Lin} } @conference {danlos:hal-01179175, title = {Traduction de VerbNet vers le fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2015}, month = {05/2015}, pages = {1}, publisher = {{ACFAS}}, address = {Rimouski, Canada}, url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01179175}, author = {Danlos, Laurence and Nakamura, Takuya and Pradet, Quentin} } @conference {huyghe:halshs-01175856, title = {{Underived event nouns in French}}, year = {2015}, address = {Verona, Italy}, keywords = {Underived nouns - event nouns}, url = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01175856}, author = {Richard Huyghe and Lucie Barque and Pauline Haas and Delphine Tribout} } @conference {5040, title = {Une classification des adverbes en mauricien}, year = {2015}, address = {University Paris 8, France. }, author = {Shrita Hassamal} } @conference {4877, title = {Using the TEI as a pivot format for oral and multimodal language corpora}, year = {2015}, address = {Lyon}, author = {Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois and Etienne, C and Parisse, C and Chanard, C and Benzitoun, C} } @conference {5019, title = {The Variable Grammar of Montr{\'e}al French Negative Concord}, volume = {21}, year = {2015}, publisher = {Penn Working Papers in Linguistics}, address = {University of Pennsylvania}, author = {Heather Burnett and Mireille Tremblay and H{\'e}l{\`e}ne Blondeau}, editor = {Sabriya Fischer} } @conference {5883, title = {Verbal reduplication and event pluractionality in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2015}, month = {09/2015}, address = {University of Stuttgart (Germany)}, author = {Xiaoqian Zhang} } @conference {4732, title = {What lies at the bottom of morphological oceans?}, year = {2015}, month = {December 2015}, address = {Universit{\'e} Jean Jaur{\`e}s Toulouse}, author = {Fradin, Bernard} } @conference {4480, title = {Wh-ex-situ and Information Structure in Chinese}, year = {2015}, address = {CRLAO, INALCO}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {4474, title = {从信息结构出发来讨论汉语疑问短语的前置现象 (c{\'o}ng x{\`\i}nxi ji{\'e}g{\`o}u chuf{\={a}} l{\'a}i tǎol{\`u}n h{\`a}nyǔ y{\'\i}w{\`e}nduǎnyǔ de qi{\'a}nzh{\`\i} xi{\`a}nxi{\`a}ng) [Wh-ex-situ en chinois mandarin et la structure informationnelle]}, year = {2015}, address = {CRLAO, CNRS, Institut d{\textquoteright}Etudes Avanc{\'e}es de Paris}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {4450, title = {Adjectives and adverbs in the grande grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2014}, month = {06/2014}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Graz}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {5853, title = {Apprentissage de la dislocation clitique {\`a} gauche en FLE}, year = {2014}, author = {Etienne Riou and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5189, title = {Are intonational patterns crucial in the interpretation of questions ?}, year = {2014}, month = {02/2014}, address = {Constance-Hegne, Allemagne}, author = {{\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie and Herment, Sophie} } @conference {5541, title = {An authentic wh-sign in LIS.}, year = {2014}, month = {06/2014}, author = {Caterina Donati} } @conference {hunter:hal-00985486, title = {{Because we say so}}, year = {2014}, address = {Gothenburg, Sweden}, url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00985486}, author = {Hunter, Julie and Danlos, Laurence} } @conference {5135, title = {Coercion types in French : an experimental study}, year = {2014}, month = {06/2014}, address = {Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5039, title = {Comparative adverbs in Mauritian}, year = {2014}, address = {Paris, France}, author = {Shrita Hassamal} } @conference {5140, title = {A comparative approach to counterfactual meanings : Romance, Slavic and Australian languages (or why Murrinh-Patha is not a Romance language)}, year = {2014}, month = {12/2014}, address = {The University of Melbourne}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Rachel Nordlinger and van Egmond, Marie-Elaine} } @conference {2918, title = {Constitution et classification d{\textquoteright}un corpus de focalisations prosodiques en parole interpr{\'e}t{\'e}e}, year = {2014}, keywords = {focalisation, parole interpr{\'e}t{\'e}e, soulignement prosodique}, author = {R{\'e}mi Godement-Berline} } @conference {5302, title = {Contact, variation, changement~: le cas du contact du truku et du chinois {\`a} Taiwan~}, year = {2014}, month = {03/2014}, address = {Paris : Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {4451, title = {Coordination and ellipsis in natural language}, year = {2014}, month = {07/2014}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Vienne}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {5139, title = {Coptic Negative Tense{\textendash}Aspect{\textendash}Moods in a Typological Perspective}, year = {2014}, month = {12/2014}, address = {INALCO, P{\^o}le des langues et civilisation, Paris}, author = {Chris Reintges and Patrick Caudal} } @conference {5301, title = {De l{\textquoteright}aspect au temps. Expression de la temporalit{\'e} et de l{\textquoteright}aspectualit{\'e} en fran{\c c}ais L2 par des apprenants sinophones~}, year = {2014}, month = {05/2014}, address = {Montpellier : Universit{\'e} Paul Val{\'e}ry}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {5542, title = {Deciding between the external and internal definition of label }, year = {2014}, month = {03/2014}, author = {Caterina Donati and Carlo Cecchetto} } @conference {5838, title = {Deconstructing exhuberant exponence in Batsbi}, year = {2014}, address = {Budapest}, author = {Berthold Crysmann} } @conference {5036, title = {Degree adverbs in Mauritian Creole}, year = {2014}, address = {University at Buffalo, New York, USA.}, author = {Shrita Hassamal and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {5038, title = {Degree adverbs in Mauritian Creole}, year = {2014}, address = {Aix-en-Provence, France}, author = {Shrita Hassamal} } @conference {4050, title = {Deriving A{\textquoteright}-dependencies by Agree and by Match}, year = {2014}, month = {05/2014/2014}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {4449, title = {Discordances syntaxiques : la mise en facteur droite en fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2014}, month = {11/2014}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris-Diderot}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Aoi Shiraishi} } @conference {5130, title = {Dual verbal constructions in Iwaidja}, year = {2014}, month = {03/2014}, address = {ANU, Kioloa Coastal Campus}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Mailhammer, Robert and Birch, Bruce} } @conference {4442, title = { Effects of context on the processing of adversative and comparative constructions}, year = {2014}, address = {Columbus, Ohio, EU}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.1.1099.1520}, author = {Gr{\'e}goire Winterstein and Emilia Ellsiepen and Jacques Jayez and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5073, title = {Emergence and evolution of some markers in Mauritian Creole}, year = {2014}, month = {5-6 June 2014}, address = {University of Westminster, London, GB}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {5530, title = {The Eventive-Stative Alternation in Coptic Egyptian}, year = {2014}, month = {02/2014}, address = {Leiden, Netherlands}, author = {Chris Reintges and Sabrina Bendjaballah} } @conference {5843, title = {Exuberant exponence in Information based Morphology}, year = {2014}, month = {11/2014}, author = {Berthold Crysmann} } @conference {5133, title = {French 2nd group verbs as an inflectional \& lexical class - An aspectual survey}, year = {2014}, month = {04/2014}, address = {Heinrich-Heine-Universit{\"a}t D{\"u}sseldorf}, author = {Patrick Caudal} } @conference {4417, title = {Gei, Gei, Gei and Gei, interaction between lexical semantics and syntactic position of Gei in mandarin Chinese}, year = {2014}, month = {06/2014}, address = {CRLAO, Paris}, abstract = {

}, author = {Xinyue YU and Xiaoshi Hu} } @conference {5132, title = {A grammaticalization pathway for 2nd group verbs in French? - The (derivational) historical source of a lexical \& inflectional class}, year = {2014}, month = {03/2014}, address = {Leibniz Universit{\"a}t Hannover}, author = {Patrick Caudal} } @conference {4987, title = {Gross Minimality. A Locality Constraint on untriggered movement. }, year = {2014}, month = {10/2014}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot. October }, author = {Caterina Donati} } @conference {5543, title = {Gross Minimality and relative clauses in child grammar}, year = {2014}, month = {03/2014}, author = {Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati and Guasti, Maria Teresa} } @conference {5531, title = {The Inferential Evidential in Sahidic Coptic}, year = {2014}, month = {01/2014}, address = {Nijmegen, Netherlands}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {4872, title = {Influence du milieu social sur la production de liaisons dans l{\textquoteright}input parental~: {\'E}tude exploratoire de corpus denses}, year = {2014}, address = {Grenoble}, author = {Chabanal, D and Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois} } @conference {4880, title = {Input parental et acquisition de sch{\'e}mas d{\textquoteright}alternance phonologique}, year = {2014}, address = {Grenoble}, author = {Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois and Chabanal, D} } @conference {Bonami14c, title = {An integrated analysis of French liaison}, year = {2014}, pages = {29{\textendash}45}, publisher = {CSLI Publications}, address = {Stanford}, url = {http://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/FG/2004/fg-2004-paper03.pdf}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Gilles Boy{\'e} and Jesse Tseng}, editor = {Paola Monachesi and Gerhard J{\"a}ger and Gerald Penn and Shuly Wintner} } @conference {5131, title = {The Iwaidja tense-aspect system and V+V complex predicate patterns}, year = {2014}, month = {03/2014}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris-Diderot}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Mailhammer, Robert and Birch, Bruce} } @conference {5852, title = {La dislocation clitique {\`a} gauche : une faute de fran{\c c}ais ?}, year = {2014}, author = {Etienne Riou and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5033, title = {Les adverbes de degr{\'e} en cr{\'e}ole mauricien}, year = {2014}, address = {University of Paris 8, France. }, author = {Shrita Hassamal} } @conference {4871, title = {Les facteurs influen{\c c}ant l{\textquoteright}{\'e}lision du schwa en discours adress{\'e} {\`a} l{\textquoteright}enfant}, year = {2014}, address = {Grenoble}, author = {Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois} } @conference {5066, title = {Les proc{\'e}d{\'e}s de mise en relief en cr{\'e}ole mauricien : analyse contrastive avec le fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2014}, month = {29-31 oct 2014}, address = {Aix-en-Provence}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {4988, title = {Mixed Utterances in a Bimodal setting}, year = {2014}, month = {04/2014}, address = {Netherlands Institute for Advanced Studies in the humanities and Social Sciences}, author = {Caterina Donati and Chiara Branchini} } @conference {5866, title = {On Nasality in Nupoid}, year = {2014}, month = {08/2014}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Leyde}, author = {Sandro Capo Chichi} } @conference {5085, title = {Notes on the acquisition of adjunction}, year = {2014}, month = {11/2014}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot}, author = {Carla Soares-Jesel} } @conference {5079, title = {Notes on the acquisition of infinitive constructions in European Portuguese}, year = {2014}, month = {07/2014}, address = {University of Amsterdam}, author = {Carla Soares-Jesel} } @conference {5529, title = {The Old Egyptian {\'s}ḏm(.w)=f Passive and Its Implications for the Origin of the Internal Passive in Central Semitic}, year = {2014}, month = {02/2014}, address = {Leiden, Netherlands}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {5854, title = {Partially ordered set relations \& left-dislocation in French}, year = {2014}, author = {Etienne Riou and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {4435, title = {Pistes sur le conditionnement de la gradation consonantique en Same Kildin}, volume = {19}, year = {2014}, publisher = {L{\textquoteright}Harmattan}, address = {Paris}, author = {Guillaume Enguehard} } @conference {3974, title = {The polysemy of lexeme formation rules}, year = {2014}, month = {July}, address = {D{\"u}sseldorf}, author = {Delphine Tribout and Olivier Bonami} } @conference {5528, title = {Predicative (Clausal) Possession in Old and Early Middle Egyptian}, year = {2014}, month = {02/2014}, address = {Li{\`e}ge, Belgium}, author = {Chris Reintges} } @conference {4441, title = {Reference as a side effect of discourse expectations: The case of focus-sensitive particles}, year = {2014}, address = {Columbus, Ohio, EU}, author = {Israel de la Fuente and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5880, title = {Representation and processing of French verb-noun compounds}, year = {2014}, address = {Niagara-on-the-Lake, France}, keywords = {French, verb-noun compounds}, url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01137624}, author = {Fradin, Bernard and Isel, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric and Rosenfeld, Lisa} } @conference {grant:hal-01451790, title = {The role of conceptual accessibility on word order alternations in French: Evidence from sentence recall Complement order}, year = {2014}, note = {Poster}, month = {07/2014}, publisher = {{Universit{\'e} de Gen{\`e}ve}}, address = {Gen{\`e}ve}, keywords = {animacy, coordination, Ditransitive construction, French, Voice Alternation (active/passive), word order}, url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01451790}, author = {Grant, Margaret and Juliette Thuilier and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e} and Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {4414, title = {The Strict and Sloppy Identity Puzzle --- Differences between Mandarin, Japanese and English}, year = {2014}, month = {06/2014}, address = {INALCO, Paris}, author = {Yiqin Qiu} } @conference {5188, title = {Structuration prosodique des syntagmes d{\'e}tach{\'e}s en Fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2014}, month = {09/2014}, address = {M{\"u}nster, Allemagne}, author = {{\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie} } @conference {4418, title = {The syntax of Gei in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2014}, month = {11/2014}, address = {Tsinghua University, Beijing}, abstract = {

}, author = {Xinyue YU and Xiaoshi Hu} } @conference {5136, title = {Taking the Australianist perspective : A view of TAM from down under}, year = {2014}, month = {06/2014}, address = {Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore}, author = {Patrick Caudal} } @conference {5134, title = {T/A(M) in the verbal systems of Australian languages...and French - Some key issues}, year = {2014}, month = {05/2014}, address = {ENS Ulm, Paris}, author = {Patrick Caudal} } @conference {5035, title = {The two AND-conjunctions in Mauritian Creole}, year = {2014}, address = {University of Westminster, London, England. }, author = {Shrita Hassamal} } @conference {5034, title = {The two AND-conjunctions in Mauritian Creole}, year = {2014}, address = {University of Lisbon, Portugal. }, author = {Shrita Hassamal} } @conference {5037, title = {The two-AND conjunctions in Mauritian Creole}, year = {2014}, address = {University of Pavia, Italy}, author = {Shrita Hassamal} } @conference {4027, title = {The use of prosodic focalization in acting}, year = {2014}, keywords = {acting, compression, focalization, narrow focus}, author = {R{\'e}mi Godement-Berline} } @conference {4347, title = {Variable morphotactics in a nutshell: the case of French pronominal affixes}, year = {2014}, month = {November}, address = {Paris}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Berthold Crysmann} } @conference {4879, title = {Variation phonologique et interactions parents-enfant : le cas particulier des jeux de r{\^o}le}, year = {2014}, address = {Saint-Denis}, author = {Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois} } @conference {4437, title = {VP Ellipsis beyond syntactic identity: the case of nominal antecedents}, year = {2014}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, doi = {10.13140/2.1.4713.2488}, author = {Philip Miller and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {4091, title = {Wh-ex-situ and the Left Periphery in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2014}, month = {04/2014}, address = {Rome, Italie}, keywords = {left periphery, Mandarin Chinese, wh-ex-situ}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {4465, title = {Why are distributive readings dispreferred?}, year = {2014}, month = {10/2014}, address = {Lisbonne}, abstract = {

}, url = {http://www.fcsh.unl.pt/linguistica/goingromance2014/GR_Prog.pdf}, author = {Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin and Emilia Ellsiepen and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5062, title = {Analyse s{\'e}mantique et fonctionnelle de certaines particularit{\'e}s morphosyntaxiques et lexicales du fran{\c c}ais de Maurice}, year = {2013}, month = {29-31 mai 2013}, address = {CATIFQ, Universit{\'e} de Sherbrooke, Qu{\'e}bec Canada}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {4456, title = {Anti-focus effects in pronoun resolution?}, year = {2013}, month = {9/2013}, address = {Marseille}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.1.4154.1282}, author = {Israel de la Fuente and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {4810, title = {Beyond Obligatory Presuppositions}, year = {2013}, pages = {20}, address = {Gen{\`e}ve}, author = {Pascal Amsili and Claire Beyssade} } @conference {Bonami13e, title = {Causes and consequences of complexity in Portuguese verbal paradigms}, year = {2013}, month = {septembre}, address = {Dubrovnik}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Ana R. Lu{\'\i}s} } @conference {4453, title = {Clause structure matters: The role of left-dislocation \& clefts in pronoun resolution}, year = {2013}, month = {03/2013}, address = {University of South Carolina}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.1.1245.9682}, author = {Barbara Hemforth and Israel de la Fuente and Colonna, Saveria and Schimke, Sarah} } @conference {5306, title = {Code switching between Mandarin Chinese and Taroko: How do we account for doubling in mixed DPs}, year = {2013}, month = {02/2013}, address = {Paris : Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {5307, title = {Codeswitching between Mandarin Chinese and Taroko: demonstrative, numeral and possessive determiners~}, year = {2013}, month = {02/2013}, address = {SeDyl, CNRS Villejuif}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {5123, title = {Complex predicate patterns across Australia: evidence for areal grammaticalization cline(s)?}, year = {2013}, month = {05/2013}, address = {INALCO, Paris}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Maia Ponsonnet and van Egmond, Marie-Elaine} } @conference {5110, title = {Complex predicates in Murrinh-Patha: towards a formal and comparative approach}, year = {2013}, address = {INALCO, Paris}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Rachel Nordlinger and Seiss, Melanie} } @conference {5304, title = {A comprehensive semantic account of the functions of nage 那个 in spoken Taiwan Mandarin~}, year = {2013}, month = {06/2013}, address = {Ann Arbor : University of Michigan}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {5881, title = {Controlling arbitrariness: descriptive economy as an index of inflectional complexity}, year = {2013}, month = {11/2013}, address = {San Diego (Californie, USA)}, author = {G{\'e}raldine Walther} } @conference {5303, title = {A corpus-driven approach to the grammatical and discursive functions of nage 那个/zhege 这个 in spoken Taiwan Mandarin~}, year = {2013}, month = {09/2013}, address = {Paris : CRLAO/EHESS}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {5064, title = {De l{\textquoteright}{\'e}mergence de certains marqueurs discursifs en cr{\'e}ole mauricien}, year = {2013}, month = {15-20 juil 2013}, publisher = {Laboratoire ATILF (CNRS/Universit{\'e} de Lorraine) / Soci{\'e}t{\'e} de linguistique romane}, address = {Nancy}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {5126, title = {Don{\textquoteright}t negate an apprehensive, it might turn prohibitive! - The place of the apprehensive category in the TAM system of {Jaminjung}}, year = {2013}, month = {05/2013}, address = {Manchester}, author = {Schultze-Berndt, Eva and Patrick Caudal} } @conference {5873, title = {The earliest utterances in dialogue: towards a formal theory of parent/child talk in interaction}, year = {2013}, month = {12/2013}, address = {Amsterdam}, abstract = {

Early, initial utterances by children have received relatively little attention from researchers on language acquisition and almost no attempts to describe them using a formal grammar. In this paper we develop a taxonomy for such utterances, inspired by a study of the Providence corpus from CHILDES and driven by the need to describe how the contents of early child utterances arise from an interaction of form and dialogical context. The results of our corpus study demonstrate that even at this early stage quite intricate semantic mechanisms are in play, including non-referential meaning, akin to non\–specific readings of quantifiers. We sketch a formal framework for describing the dialogue context and grammar that underlies such utterances. We consider very briefly and informally how some such utterances emerge from parent/child interaction.

}, author = {Jonathan Ginzburg and Moradlou, Sara} } @conference {5845, title = { Eliminating rule blocks from realisational morphology}, year = {2013}, month = {02/2013}, address = {Paris-Sorbonne}, author = {Berthold Crysmann} } @conference {4869, title = {{\'E}tude comparative du discours adress{\'e} {\`a} l{\textquoteright}enfant et du discours adress{\'e} {\`a} l{\textquoteright}apprenant de fran{\c c}ais langue {\'e}trang{\`e}re}, year = {2013}, address = {Perpignan}, author = {Saddour, I and Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois and Chabanal, D and Chanier, T} } @conference {4457, title = {Expectations matter when resolving pronouns in explanations and temporal clauses: The differences between even and only}, year = {2013}, month = {09/2013}, address = {Marseille}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.1.1794.8323}, author = {Israel de la Fuente and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5842, title = {Extending the scope of Paninian competition in realisational morphology}, year = {2013}, month = {09/2013}, address = {Dubrovnik}, author = {Berthold Crysmann} } @conference {4796, title = {French Denominal Adjectives and their Syntactic Equivalents}, year = {2013}, address = {Lille}, author = {Jana Strnadov{\'a}} } @conference {Crysmann13, title = {French pronominal affixes: a challenge for theories of morphotactics}, year = {2013}, month = {November}, address = {San Diego}, author = {Berthold Crysmann and Olivier Bonami} } @conference {5545, title = {Gross Minimality in child grammar }, year = {2013}, month = {11/2013}, author = {Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati and Guasti, Maria Teresa} } @conference {4459, title = {Heaviness in a Verb-final Language: Evidence from Persian}, year = {2013}, month = {09/2013}, address = {Marseille}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.1.2450.1924}, author = {Pegah Faghiri and Samvelian, Pollet and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {4412, title = {The Identity Problem of VP-Ellipsis in Mandarin}, year = {2013}, month = {06/2013}, address = {CRLAO, EHESS, Paris}, author = {Yiqin Qiu} } @conference {4862, title = {Input characteristics and impact on the acquisition of phonological variables in French}, year = {2013}, address = {Manchester, United Kingdom}, keywords = {Acquisition du langage, Child directed speech, discours adress{\'e} {\`a} l{\textquoteright}enfant, Language Acquisition, Phonological variables, Schwa, Variables phonologiques}, url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00850016}, author = {Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois and Saddour, I and Chabanal, D and Chanier, T} } @conference {4870, title = {Input in first and second language acquisition: the case of schwa variation and liaison in French}, year = {2013}, address = {Amsterdam}, author = {Saddour, I and Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois and Chabanal, D and Chanier, T} } @conference {5032, title = {Les deux conjonctions- ET en cr{\'e}ole mauricien}, year = {2013}, address = {University of Paris 8, France}, author = {Shrita Hassamal} } @conference {4388, title = {Measuring the Effect of Discourse Structure on Sentiment Analysis}, year = {2013}, address = {Samos, Greece}, author = {Baptiste Chardon and Farah Benamara and Yvette Yannick Mathieu and Vladimir Popescu and Nicholas Asher} } @conference {4049, title = {A Minimalist Approach to the Resumptivity in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2013}, month = {06/2013}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {Bonami13g, title = {A morphologists perspective on Creole complexity}, year = {2013}, month = {juillet}, address = {Gen{\`e}ve}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Ana R. Lu{\'\i}s} } @conference {4413, title = {Negation as diagnostic in VP-Ellipsis in Mandarin}, year = {2013}, month = {09/2013}, address = {EHESS, Paris}, author = {Yiqin Qiu} } @conference {4411, title = {Negation as diagnostic in VP-Ellipsis in Mandarin}, year = {2013}, month = {06/2013}, address = {Universit{\'e} Normale Nationale de Taiwan}, author = {Yiqin Qiu} } @conference {4410, title = {Negation in VP-Ellipsis in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2013}, month = {03/2013}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Potsdam, Germany}, author = {Yiqin Qiu} } @conference {4986, title = {Nouns do not take complements. A theoretical claim and a psycholinguistic experiment. }, year = {2013}, month = {03/2013}, address = {Keio Tokyo}, author = {Caterina Donati} } @conference {4354, title = {Now : op{\'e}rateur de rapprochement}, volume = {10}, year = {2013}, month = {2014}, pages = {121-133}, publisher = {Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot}, edition = {Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot}, address = {Paris 7}, author = {Boulin, Myriam} } @conference {4455, title = {Only and Even: Focusing effects on pronoun resolution in temporal clauses and explanations}, year = {2013}, month = {06/2013}, doi = {10.13140/2.1.1433.1843}, url = {https://detec2013.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/delafuente_hemforth.pdf}, author = {Israel de la Fuente and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {4419, title = {A phasal derivation of clitcization in French causative constructions}, year = {2013}, month = {12/2013}, address = {Coimbra}, abstract = {

}, author = {Xiaoshi Hu} } @conference {5544, title = {Please do not Move that remnant too much! }, year = {2013}, month = {10/2013}, author = {Carlo Cecchetto and Caterina Donati} } @conference {5884, title = {Postverbal complements in mandarin Chinese}, year = {2013}, month = {06/2013}, address = {National Taiwan Normal University}, author = {Chen Zhao} } @conference {5063, title = {Proc{\'e}d{\'e}s de mise en relief en cr{\'e}ole mauricien}, year = {2013}, month = {6-8 juin 2013}, address = {Perpignan}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {4460, title = { Pronoun resolution is fast and automatic: Evidence from a German visual world experiment}, year = {2013}, month = {09/2013}, address = {Marseille}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.1.2974.4803}, author = {Schimke, Sarah and Colonna, Saveria and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5127, title = {On the relations between scalarity and event structure - a study in the semantics of French verbal and adjectival predicates}, year = {2013}, month = {09/2013}, address = {Julius-Maximilians-Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, author = {Patrick Caudal} } @conference {5844, title = {The representation of morphological tone in a computational grammar of Hausa}, year = {2013}, month = {06/2014}, address = {Paris-Sorbonne}, author = {Berthold Crysmann} } @conference {4888, title = {Requests in Chinese e-mails: Strategy types, discourse patterns and interpersonal variations}, year = {2013}, month = {09/2013}, abstract = {

\  \  \  With the increasing use of the Internet as a means of communication, the study of requests by e-mails has evolved. Most previous researches in this area have been conducted around the use of the English language. This study, however, aims to investigate strategies and discourse pattern employed in Chinese request e-mails, and to explore the influence of interpersonal factors on the choice of requestive strategies. The data include 160 e-mails written in academic situations, elicited from 40 university students in Taiwan, all of whom are native speakers of Mandarin Chinese. The result reveals that, on average, a Chinese request email include 1 to 2 head acts accompanied by 9 to 10 supportive moves. Most of the head acts are realized through direct strategies, among which, \“hedged performatives\” and \“want statements\” are the two most preferred ones. As to supportive moves, \“grounders\” outnumber all the other strategies in the e-mails. In relation to the information sequence, Chinese e-mail requests prefer an \“indirect discourse,\” where the first head acts could be seen only after 59\% of the supportive moves are used. Regarding interpersonal variants, the present study shows that both \“social distance\” and \“relative power\” have significant effects on the choice of strategies. The findings support Gu\’s (2011) observation that e-mails, as a communication means, are more similar to personal handwritten letters than to any computer-mediated platforms. Requests made by e-mails are like those made through letters on both strategy and discourse levels. Besides, \“reducing status effects,\” which could be found in some online communication platforms, are absent in the data of present study.

Main references

Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning \& Technology, 11(2), 59-81.

Blum-Kulka, S, House, J., \& Kasper, G (1989) (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Chang, Y.-Y., \& Hsu, Y.-P. (1998). Requests on e-mail: A cross-cultural comparison. RELC Journal, 29, 121-150.

Cultan, M. J., \& Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, \& L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Gu, Y. (2011). Modern Chinese politeness revisited. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini, \& D. Z. K\ád\ár (Eds.), Politeness across cultures (pp. 128-148). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hong, W. (1996). An empirical study of Chinese request strategies. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 122, 127-138.

Lin, Y. H. (2009). Query preparatory modals: Cross-linguistic and cross-situational variations in request modification. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1636\–1656.

Kirkpatrick, A. (1991). Information sequencing in Mandarin letters of request. Anthropological Linguistics, 33(2), 183-203.

Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K., Watson, R. T., \& Walczuch, R. M. (1998). Reducing status effects with computer-mediated communication: Evidence from two distinct national cultures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(1), 119-141.

Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.

}, author = {Ting-shiu Lin} } @conference {4052, title = {Resumptive Chains : Relativization vs. Left-Dislocation}, year = {2013}, month = {04/2013}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {4458, title = {The role of focus in within- and between-sentence pronoun resolution}, year = {2013}, month = {09/2013}, address = {Marseille}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.1.1663.7608}, author = {Colonna, Saveria and Schimke, Sarah and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {5081, title = {Some remarks on adjunction in early language acquisition}, year = {2013}, month = {11/2013}, author = {Carla Soares-Jesel} } @conference {5546, title = {Towards a grammar for code blending (and code switching)}, year = {2013}, month = {07/2013}, author = {Caterina Donati and Chiara Branchini} } @conference {Bonami13f, title = {Towards a robust assessment of implicative relations in inflectional systems}, year = {2013}, month = {f{\'e}vrier}, address = {Paris}, author = {Olivier Bonami} } @conference {5305, title = {Utilisation du Pass{\'e} Compos{\'e} comme mise en relief dans les lectes d{\textquoteright}apprenants chinois de FLE}, year = {2013}, month = {06/2013}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Perpignan}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {1483, title = {Variation in French and Spanish Interrogative Intonation and L2 Perception}, year = {2013}, month = {2013}, keywords = {French interrogative intonation, Perception of intonation in L2, Spanish interrogative intonation}, author = {Fabi{\'a}n Santiago Vargas}, editor = {Mairano, Paolo} } @conference {5051, title = {Vers un treebank du fran{\c c}ais parl{\'e}}, year = {2013}, address = {Les Sables d{\textquoteright}Olonnes}, url = {http://www.taln2013.org/actes/www/T ALN-2013/}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Beno{\^\i}t Crabb{\'e}} } @conference {1088, title = {The acquisition of English dative alternation: Proficiency effects in French L2 learners}, volume = {25}, year = {2012}, month = {03/2012}, pages = {152}, url = {http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_152.pdf}, author = {Wurm, Mirjana and Lars Konieczny and Barbara Hemforth}, editor = {Bradley, Dianne and Fernandez, Eva and Fodor, Janet} } @conference {5083, title = {The acquisition of infinival constructions in European Portuguese: from bare forms to embedding}, year = {2012}, month = {11/2012}, address = {Boston University}, author = {Carla Soares-Jesel} } @conference {1150, title = {Ambig{\"u}it{\'e} des syntagmes interrogatifs en mandarin : une explication pour les enseignants mais pas n{\'e}cessairement pour les apprenants de langue}, year = {2012}, month = {06/2012}, address = {INALCO, Paris}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {1415, title = {Antisym{\'e}trie et analyses du DP en chinois}, year = {2012}, author = {Xiaoliang Huang} } @conference {1038, title = {Assessing Description Compactedness : A Comparative Study of 4 Competing Formalisations for French Verbal Inflection}, year = {2012}, month = {17/01/2012}, address = {University of Surrey, Guildford, Royaume Uni}, keywords = {C-INV}, url = {http://web.me.com/gwalther/homepage/Publications_(fr)_files/Surrey20120117handout2.pdf}, author = {G{\'e}raldine Walther} } @conference {1104, title = {Comment traduire les marqueurs discursifs du vietnamien en fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2012}, month = {04/2012}, address = {Paris - FRANCE}, keywords = {C-COM, marqueurs discursifs, sc{\`e}ne {\'e}nonciative}, author = {Thi Hoang Anh Bui} } @conference {danlos:hal-00755367, title = {{Connecteurs de discours adverbiaux : Probl{\`e}mes {\`a} l{\textquoteright}interface syntaxe-s{\'e}mantique}}, year = {2012}, month = {Sep}, pages = {7 p.}, publisher = {{Institut de Langues Romanes, University of South Bohemia}}, address = {Nov{\'e} Hrady, Czech Republic}, url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00755367}, author = {Danlos, Laurence} } @conference {1291, title = {Constraints on Nominal Bases for French Adjectives}, year = {2012}, address = {Vienne}, author = {Jana Strnadov{\'a}} } @conference {1159, title = {Contribution {\`a} l{\textquoteright}{\'e}tude des marqueurs ?ance{\~n} et doocneh en khmer contemporain}, year = {2012}, address = {EHESS, Paris}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Paillard, Denis} } @conference {1102, title = {Contribution {\`a} l{\textquoteright}{\'e}tude des marqueurs discursifs du vietnamien: le cas de tuy nhi{\^e}n, tuy thế, tuy vậy}, year = {2012}, month = {30/05-02/06/2012}, address = {AGAY - France}, keywords = {C-COM, {\'e}nonciation, marqueurs discursifs, sc{\`e}ne {\'e}nonciative}, author = {Thi Hoang Anh Bui} } @conference {1103, title = {Contribution {\`a} l{\textquoteright}{\'e}tude des marqueurs discursifs du vietnamien: le cas de tr{\^e}n thực tế, thực ra, thật ra}, year = {2012}, month = {06/2012}, address = {Paris - FRANCE}, keywords = {C-COM, {\'e}nonciation, marqueurs discursifs, sc{\`e}ne {\'e}nonciative}, author = {Thi Hoang Anh Bui} } @conference {1250, title = {On the correlation between -age and -ment and semantic distinctions in French nominalizations}, year = {2012}, month = {August 29-Septem}, publisher = {Stockholm University}, address = {Stockholm University}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Fradin, Bernard} } @conference {5067, title = {Creoles are not typologically distinct from non-creoles}, year = {2012}, month = {11-13 April 2012}, address = {Aarhus University (Danemark)}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing and Leoue, Jean} } @conference {1400, title = {D{\'e}composition des pr{\'e}dicats adjectivaux en chinois dans le cadre de la syntaxe de premi{\`e}re phase}, year = {2012}, address = {CRLAO, EHESS}, author = {Xiaoqian Zhang} } @conference {1414, title = {Deriving the Num-Cl-(de)-N Order in Chinese}, year = {2012}, address = {The Chinese University of Hong Kong,}, author = {Xiaoliang Huang} } @conference {1290, title = {Des fronti{\`e}res prosodiques dans les langues romanes}, year = {2012}, address = {Universit{\'e} Charles-de-Gaulle Lille 3}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Feldhausen, Ingo} } @conference {1087, title = {Different effects of focus in intra- and inter-sentential pronoun resolution in German and French}, volume = {25}, year = {2012}, month = {03/2012}, pages = {113}, address = {NewYork}, url = {http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_113.pdf}, author = {Colonna, Saveria and Schimke, Sarah and Medam, Tiphaine and Barbara Hemforth}, editor = {Bradley, Dianne and Fernandez, Eva and Fodor, Janet} } @conference {Bonami12c, title = {Discovering implicative morphology}, year = {2012}, month = {d{\'e}cembre}, address = {Bordeaux}, author = {Olivier Bonami} } @conference {1264, title = {The early stage of the acquisition of phonotactics from a learnability perspective}, year = {2012}, address = {Paris}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Giorgio Magri} } @conference {4777, title = {The effect of aging on route memorization.}, year = {2012}, address = {Rome, Italie}, abstract = {

When we follow a route in an unknown city, we build a mental representation of the environment, which is stored in long-term memory and could be used later in different kind of tasks like recognizing the place, redoing the route, or drawing a map. In this experiment, we focus on the cognitive resources that are used to build and then manipulate that mental representation, and the effect of aging on the spatial representation. Previous research has demonstrated age-related decline in the use of spatial representation, but the spatial representation is complex and requires the integration of many components that may show differential susceptibility to aging. Different tasks were used to assess the effect of aging on different components of the spatial representation. The video of an unfamiliar route in a city near Paris was projected to the young and older participants twice. After the presentation, four tasks were used to assess the mental representation of the participants (visual recognition task, direction decision task, order decision task, and statement verification). Different tests were used to identify the factors that explain individual differences in the performance. The results show that older adults have poorer performance than younger adults in the 4 tasks. Analyses of mediation show that the effect of aging on visual recognition task would be explained by the impairment of episodic memory. Moreover, the effect of aging on the direction task would be explained by the impairment of working memory.

}, author = {Doriane Gras and Gyselinck, V. and Daniel, M. P. and Labiale, G. and Piolino, P.} } @conference {4779, title = {Effect of aging on spatial representation}, year = {2012}, address = {Tours, France}, author = {Doriane Gras and Gyselinck, V. and Daniel, M. P. and Labiale, G. and Piolino, P.} } @conference {5080, title = {European Portuguese Clefts: evidence from acquisition data and adult production}, year = {2012}, month = {12/12}, address = {Katholieke Universiteit Leuven}, author = {Maria Lobo and Ana L{\'u}cia Santos and Carla Soares-Jesel} } @conference {1151, title = {Four Types of Wh-ex-situ in Chinese}, year = {2012}, month = {2012}, address = {CRLAO, EHESS, Paris, France}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {1089, title = {Grounding of anaphora in pointing gestures: Order of mention and prominence}, volume = {25}, year = {2012}, month = {03/2012}, pages = {193}, address = {New York}, url = {http://cuny2012.commons.gc.cuny.edu/files/2012/03/cuny2012_193.pdf}, author = {Barbara Hemforth and Homassel, Anne-Sophie and M{\"u}ller-Feldmeth, Daniel and Lars Konieczny}, editor = {Bradley, Dianne and Fernandez, Eva and Fodor, Janet} } @conference {1249, title = {Handling the semantics of evaluative morphology}, year = {2012}, month = {February, 9-12 2}, publisher = {Wirtsch{\"a}ftsuniversit{\"a}t Wien}, address = {Wien, {\"O}sterreich}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Fradin, Bernard} } @conference {1213, title = {The Hierarchy of adjuncts in Mandarin VP ellipsis}, year = {2012}, month = {06/2012}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Yiqin Qiu} } @conference {1214, title = {Hierarchy of Adjuncts in V-Stranding VP-Ellipsis of Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2012}, address = {CRLAO, EHESS}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Yiqin Qiu} } @conference {1286, title = {HPSG et la grammaire du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2012}, address = {Lyon}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e}} } @conference {BilbiieGazdik12, title = {Hybrid Coordination in Hungarian and Romanian}, year = {2012}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Anna Gazdik and Gabriela B{\^\i}lb{\^\i}ie}, editor = {Christopher Pinon} } @conference {1109, title = {Inflectional periphrasis as collocation}, year = {2012}, month = {05/2012}, address = {Frankfurt}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Webelhuth, Gert} } @conference {4778, title = {Influence des diff{\'e}rences individuelles sur l{\textquoteright}utilisation des composantes verbales et spatiales de la m{\'e}moire de travail lors de l{\textquoteright}encodage d{\textquoteright}itin{\'e}raires virtuels}, year = {2012}, address = {Rennes, France}, author = {Doriane Gras and Gyselinck, V. and Perrussel, M. and Orriols, E. and Piolino, P.} } @conference {Bonami12v, title = {Information-theoretic measures of inflectional complexity: Empirical challenges and analytic rewards}, year = {2012}, address = {Guildford}, author = {Olivier Bonami} } @conference {5870, title = {Intransitivit{\'e} scind{\'e}e, passif et sujet impersonnel en vietnamien}, year = {2012}, address = {Strasbourg, France}, keywords = {intransitivit{\'e} scind{\'e}e, passif, sujet impersonnel, vietnamien}, url = {https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01507217}, author = {Dao, Huy Linh} } @conference {1113, title = {L{\textquoteright}alternance de forme verbale en mauricien et ha{\"\i}tien : une {\'e}tude comparative}, year = {2012}, month = {11/2012}, address = {R{\'e}duit, {\^I}le Maurice}, author = {Fabiola Henri and Glaude, Herby} } @conference {5879, title = {L{\textquoteright}espace perdu en fran{\c c}ais : Le cas de en}, year = {2012}, month = {10/2012}, address = {Katholieke Universiteit Leuven}, author = {Daniel Rojas Plata} } @conference {4868, title = {L{\textquoteright}exemple d{\textquoteright}un corpus d{\textquoteright}interactions orales spontan{\'e}es structur{\'e} en TEI : quels avantages pour l{\textquoteright}interop{\'e}rabilit{\'e}, l{\textquoteright}analyse et le partage des donn{\'e}es de la recherche ?}, year = {2012}, address = {Bordeaux}, author = {Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois and Chanier, T and Chabanal, D} } @conference {1212, title = {La reconstruction des adverbes dans {\textquoteright}V-Stranding VP-Ellipsis{\textquoteright} en chinois mandarin}, year = {2012}, month = {06/2012}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris Diderot}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Yiqin Qiu} } @conference {5876, title = {La temporalit{\'e} dans le r{\'e}cit}, year = {2012}, month = {12/2014}, address = {Phnom Penh}, author = {Non, Dara} } @conference {1158, title = {Les langues d{\textquoteright}Asie du Sud Est comme enjeu pour les th{\'e}ories linguistiques}, year = {2012}, address = {Agay (France)}, keywords = {C-INV}, author = {Paillard, Denis} } @conference {danlos:hal-00755329, title = {{M{\'e}thodologie pour le FDTB (French Discourse Tree Bank)}}, year = {2012}, month = {Dec}, pages = {2 p.}, address = {Bordeaux, France}, url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00755329}, author = {Danlos, Laurence} } @conference {1289, title = {Modeling individual variation in prosody: the case of Spanish Clitic Left-Dislocations}, year = {2012}, address = {Oxford, England}, keywords = {C-AFF}, author = {Feldhausen, Ingo} } @conference {Henri12, title = {Morphomic structure in Mauritian : further evidence from English loan-verb integration}, year = {2012}, publisher = {ZAS}, address = {Berlin}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Fabiola Henri} } @conference {4798, title = {Multiple Derivation in French Denominal Adjectives}, year = {2012}, author = {Jana Strnadov{\'a}} } @conference {4756, title = {Parameters on the obligatoriness of {\textquoteright}too{\textquoteright}}, year = {2012}, edition = {Alastair Butler}, author = {Pascal Amsili and Emilia Ellsiepen and Gr{\'e}goire Winterstein} } @conference {Bonami12d, title = {Predicting article agglutination in Mauritian}, year = {2012}, month = {novembre}, address = {Lisbonne}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Fabiola Henri} } @conference {5868, title = {Projective behavior and at-issueness of indefinite NPIs and FCIs{\textquoteright}}, year = {2012}, month = {12/2012}, address = {Katholieke Universiteit Leuven}, author = {Margot Colinet} } @conference {889, title = {PROSOTRAN : un syst{\`e}me d{\textquoteright}annotation symbolique des faits prosodiques pour les donn{\'e}es non-standards}, year = {2012}, month = {06/2012}, address = {Grenoble}, author = {Katarina Bartkova and {\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie and Fabi{\'a}n Santiago Vargas} } @conference {Bonami12u, title = {A realisational approach to variable morph ordering}, year = {2012}, address = {Amherst}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Berthold Crysmann} } @conference {4409, title = {The Reconstruction of Adjuncts in V-Stranding VP-Ellipsis of Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2012}, month = {08/2012}, address = {The Hong Kong Polytechnic University}, author = {Yiqin Qiu} } @conference {1090, title = {Referring expressions in direct and indirect speech in Czech, English, German and Norwegian}, year = {2012}, month = {04/2012}, address = {Freiburg, Germany}, url = {http://icngl11.uni-freiburg.de/theme.html}, author = {Barbara Hemforth and Borthen, Kaja and Schmiedtova, Barbara and Behrens, Bergljot and Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine} } @conference {5069, title = {Repr{\'e}sentation d{\textquoteright}une norme endog{\`e}ne du fran{\c c}ais de l{\textquoteright}Ile Maurice~: extraction et analyse des mauricianismes morphosyntaxiques et lexicaux dans un corpus de sketches (2004-2011) de J.C. Antoine (journaliste mauricien)}, year = {2012}, month = {1-3 June 2012}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Newcastle (G-B)}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {5068, title = {Repr{\'e}sentation d{\textquoteright}une norme endog{\`e}ne du fran{\c c}ais de l{\textquoteright}Ile Maurice~: extraction et analyse des mauricianismes morphosyntaxiques et lexicaux dans un corpus de sketches (2004-2011) de J.C. Antoine (journaliste mauricien)}, year = {2012}, month = {21-22 mai 2012}, address = {Universit{\'e} de Gand, Belgique}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {578, title = {Scalar Properties of Emotion Verbs and Their Representation in WordNet}, year = {2012}, address = {Matsue, Japon.}, author = {Christiane Fellbaum and Yvette Yannick Mathieu} } @conference {5311, title = {Some remarks on the acquisition of clefts: spontaneous and elicited production}, year = {2012}, month = {07/2012}, address = {Lisbon}, doi = {CLUL / CLUNL}, author = {Maria Lobo and Ana L{\'u}cia Santos and Carla Soares-Jesel} } @conference {1251, title = {Sur la corr{\'e}lation existant entre les suffixes -age et -ment et les distinctions s{\'e}mantiques observables dans les nominalisations du fran{\c c}ais}, year = {2012}, month = {7 septembre 2012}, publisher = {Universit{\'e} de Nancy 2}, address = {MSH Lorraine, Nancy}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Fradin, Bernard} } @conference {1152, title = {Syntactic representation of discourse-configurationality in Mandarin}, year = {2012}, month = {09/2012}, address = {University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Su{\`e}de}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {1110, title = {Systemic polyfunctionality and morphology-syntax interdependencies}, year = {2012}, month = {05/2012}, address = {Lexington, Kentucky}, author = {Farrell Ackerman and Olivier Bonami and Irina Nikolaeva} } @conference {1096, title = {TAM puzzles in Jaminjung}, year = {2012}, month = {04/2012}, address = {SOAS, University of London}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Schultze-Berndt, Eva} } @conference {1108, title = {Tracing the origins of inflection in creoles: A quantitative analysis}, year = {2012}, month = {04/2012}, address = {Aarhus, Denmark}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Fabiola Henri and Ana R. Lu{\'\i}s} } @conference {5061, title = {Two Corpora Based NooJ Modules for Mauritian Creole and Haitian Creole}, year = {2012}, month = {14-16 June 2012}, address = {Paris}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {966, title = {Two mysteries in the sound pattern of Maghribi Arabic}, year = {2012}, address = {Rutgers NJ}, author = {Lowenstamm, Jean} } @conference {Bonami12t, title = {Underspecification and the semantics of lexeme formation}, year = {2012}, month = {f{\'e}vrier}, address = {Vienne}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Delphine Tribout} } @conference {1091, title = {Understanding coordinate clauses in Czech, English, German and Norwegian}, year = {2012}, month = {04/2012}, address = {Freiburg, Germany}, keywords = {C-COM}, url = {http://icngl11.uni-freiburg.de/theme.html}, author = {Behrens, Bergljot and Schmiedtova, Barbara and Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine and Barbara Hemforth} } @conference {1115, title = {Verbs and Nouns with glide-median roots in Egyptian Arabic}, year = {2012}, address = {Paris}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Radwa Fathi} } @conference {873, title = {When wh-questions interact with information structure}, year = {2012}, month = {03/2012}, address = {Frankfurt, Allemagne, 7-9 March}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {4887, title = {汉语电子邮件中请求语言之使用 [Requ{\^e}tes dans les courriels du chinois]}, year = {2012}, month = {05/2012}, author = {Ting-shiu Lin} } @conference {5309, title = {Chinese as a rising global language in France and its repercussions on Chinese migrants}, year = {2011}, month = {04/2011}, address = {University of Maryland}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {894, title = {Core and adjoined projections in the left/right periphery in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2011}, month = {09/2011}, address = {Ca{\textquoteright} Foscari University, Venise, Italie}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {560, title = {Creoles are NOT typologically distinct from non-creoles}, year = {2011}, month = {06/2011}, address = {Paris}, author = {Bartoletti, Corinna and Guillaume Fon Sing and Leoue, Jean} } @conference {567, title = {De la grammaticalisation de certains connecteurs en cr{\'e}ole mauricien}, year = {2011}, month = {03/2011}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris 8}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {Bonami11g, title = {The Emergence of morphomic structure in Romance-based Creoles}, year = {2011}, month = {July}, address = {Osaka}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Fabiola Henri and Ana R. Lu{\'\i}s} } @conference {548, title = {Exploring L2 learner intonation to develop a phonological analysis of final rises in French.}, year = {2011}, month = {06/2011}, address = {Tarragonne, Espagne}, author = {Fabi{\'a}n Santiago Vargas and {\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie} } @conference {Bonami11i, title = {French liaison: shape alternation, inflection, or both?}, year = {2011}, month = {April}, address = {Guildford}, author = {Olivier Bonami} } @conference {4781, title = {Implication de la m{\'e}moire de travail dans l{\textquoteright}apprentissage d{\textquoteright}itin{\'e}raires}, year = {2011}, address = {Metz, France}, author = {Doriane Gras and Gyselinck, V.} } @conference {4780, title = {Implication of verbal and visuo-spatial working memory in a route representation from a virtual environment.}, year = {2011}, address = {San Sebastian, Espagne}, abstract = {

That research investigated the role of verbal and visuo-spatial working memory (WM) on spatial representation building using a dual-task paradigm. Subjects saw movies of routes in virtual environments while performing a spatial tapping task (spatial condition), an articulatory task (verbal condition), or no task (control condition). Then, subjects had to draw the itinerary on a map (route drawing), recognize which building among two was part of the movie (visual recognition task), and place the buildings on a map (spatial location task). WM capacities were measured with the Corsi Blocks test (spatial), the digit span test (verbal), and participants took the Mental Rotation Test (MRT). Results show that accuracy was impaired in the spatial and verbal concurrent conditions compared to the control condition for route drawing and location tasks, but not for visual recognition. Moreover, subjects with the higher spatial capacities (higher score to Corsi and MRT) were more affected by tapping than others. These results show that verbal WM is involved in the construction of a spatial representation, even when only visual information is used both at learning and test. They also suggest that participants rely on their spatial WM, especially when their capacities are high.

}, author = {Doriane Gras and Gyselinck, V.} } @conference {Bonami11d, title = {Inflectional periphrasis as collocation}, year = {2011}, month = {september}, address = {Cagliari}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Webelhuth, Gert} } @conference {874, title = {Interface strategy in Mandarin : when syntax interacts with prosody and discours}, year = {2011}, month = {10/2011}, address = {Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, P{\'e}kin, Chine, 19-21 octobre}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {4861, title = {La liaison en discours adress{\'e} {\`a} l{\textquoteright}enfant, sp{\'e}cificit{\'e}s et impacts sur l{\textquoteright}acquisition}, year = {2011}, address = {Tours, France}, keywords = {Acquisition, Child directed speech, discours adress{\'e} {\`a} l{\textquoteright}enfant, Liaison}, url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00591427}, author = {Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois and Chabanal, D and Chanier, T} } @conference {4782, title = {Les hommes ont une meilleure repr{\'e}sentation de l{\textquoteright}espace que les femmes : r{\'e}alit{\'e} ou st{\'e}r{\'e}otype ? {\'E}tudes exp{\'e}rimentales}, year = {2011}, address = {Paris, France}, abstract = {

\ Construire un mod\èle spatial de l\’espace qui nous environne repose sur de nombreuses capacit\és, parmi lesquelles les habilet\és spatiales \– pour lesquelles il existe de grandes diff\érences individuelles \− semblent les plus \évidentes. Ces habilet\és incluent la rotation mentale, la capacit\é \à manipuler des perspectives spatiales, la m\émoire des positions, le sens de l\’orientation (Fields \& Shelton, 2006). Quand la source d\’information est verbale, comme dans le cas de descriptions d\’itin\éraires, les capacit\és verbales sont \également impliqu\ées et la capacit\é de la m\émoire de travail \– verbale comme visuo-spatiale \– joue un r\ôle important (e.g. Gyselinck et al., 2009). La litt\érature psychom\étrique sur les diff\érences dues au sexe montre que les hommes tendent \à avoir de meilleures performances que les femmes dans certains tests d\’habilet\é spatiale, particuli\èrement ceux bas\és sur des t\âches de rotation mentale (Lawton, 1994; Hegarty, et al., 2006) et g\én\éralement dans toutes les t\âches li\ées \à l\’encodage des structures m\étriques des relations spatiales (Iachini, et al., 2005). Les femmes semblent elles meilleures que les hommes \à des tests d\’arrangement d\’objets, ou impliquant la m\émorisation et le rappel de points de rep\ères (Levy, Astur \& Frick, 2005). Les donn\ées sont beaucoup moins claires lorsque les environnements concern\és sont plus \écologiques et \à plus grande \échelle. Certaines \études impliquant des environnements spatiaux de taille de type pi\èce ou au-del\à ont \échou\é \à trouver des diff\érences li\ées au genre dans la reconnaissance de sc\ènes, le jugement de directions relatives, ou la capacit\é \à estimer des distances (Shelton \& McNamara, 2004\ ; Peruch, et al., 2006). Ainsi il appara\ît clairement que la phrase \“les hommes ont une meilleure repr\ésentation de l\’espace que les femmes\” est \à nuancer selon le type d\’activit\é consid\ér\ée. Ces st\ér\éotypes sont de plus susceptibles d\’influencer les processus cognitifs mis en jeu dans la construction d\’un mod\èle spatial.

Dans une s\érie d\’exp\ériences, de jeunes adultes de sexe f\éminin et masculin ont \ét\é confront\és \à des descriptions verbales d\’environnements spatiaux, soit de la taille d\’une pi\èce, soit d\’un quartier d\’une ville, et ils ont d\û r\éaliser une s\érie de t\âches destin\ées \à tester leur m\émoire des \él\éments de l\’environnement, de leur localisation et des relations spatiales entre les \él\éments. Leur capacit\é de rotation mentale et de m\émoire de travail a \ét\é \évalu\ée. Les performances ont \ét\é mises en relation avec une estimation de la force du st\ér\éotype sur les capacit\és d\’orientation et de repr\ésentation de l\’espace r\éalis\ée en fin d\’exp\érience \à l\’aide d\’un questionnaire. On s\’attend \à ce que les diff\érences de performances entre hommes et femmes ne se manifestent que sur certaines t\âches, conform\ément aux donn\ées de la litt\érature, et qu\’elles d\épendent alors de la force de leur st\ér\éotype.

}, author = {Doriane Gras and Gyselinck, V. and Dutriaux, L.} } @conference {Bonami11j, title = {Measuring inflectional complexity: French and Mauritian}, year = {2011}, month = {January}, address = {San Diego}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Gilles Boy{\'e} and Fabiola Henri} } @conference {5308, title = {Prospective aspect in Mandarin Chinese, on the aspectual value of modals y{\`a}o and hu{\`\i}}, year = {2011}, month = {09/2011}, address = {Venice : Universita Ca{\textquoteright} Foscari}, author = {Xiuwen Chen and Saillard, Claire} } @conference {893, title = {The Root/non-root Distinction and Chinese Sentence Final Particles: Division of Labor Between Syntax and Discourse}, year = {2011}, month = {09/2011}, address = {Universidad de la Rioja, Logro{\~n}o, Espagne}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {Bonami11c, title = {Sous-sp{\'e}cification, construction de lex{\`e}mes et structure du lexique}, year = {2011}, month = {october}, address = {Toulouse}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Delphine Tribout} } @conference {Bonami11b, title = {Stem spaces and regularity in verbal inflection}, year = {2011}, month = {november}, address = {Pisa}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Fabio Montermini} } @conference {568, title = {Un corpus pour le cr{\'e}ole mauricien}, year = {2011}, month = {01/2011}, address = {Inalco, Paris}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {Bonami11e, title = {Unblurring the inflection/derivation divide in Laz}, year = {2011}, month = {september}, address = {Cagliari}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Lacroix, Ren{\'e}} } @conference {4878, title = {Variation phonologique chez l{\textquoteright}enfant francophone de 40 mois~: d{\'e}veloppement lexical et impact du bain linguistique parental}, year = {2011}, address = {Paris}, author = {Chabanal, D and Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois} } @conference {4885, title = {表持續義的「還」與「還是」 [Les adverbes {\guillemotleft} h{\'a}i {\guillemotright} et {\guillemotleft} h{\'a}ish{\`\i} {\guillemotright} : S{\'e}mantique, pragmatique et fonctions dans le discours]}, year = {2011}, month = {12/2011}, author = {Ting-shiu Lin} } @conference {895, title = {On the adjunct use of what in Chinese}, year = {2010}, address = {Harvard University, MA}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {Henri10d, title = {Assessing empirically the inflectional complexity of Mauritian Creole}, year = {2010}, publisher = {ZAS}, address = {Berlin}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Fabiola Henri} } @conference {4867, title = {Description de l{\textquoteright}input dans le cadre du recueil de corpus denses parents-enfants}, year = {2010}, address = {Toulouse}, author = {Chabanal, D and Lo{\"\i}c Li{\'e}geois} } @conference {4786, title = {Effet de la modalit{\'e} de pr{\'e}sentation sur les faux souvenirs}, year = {2010}, address = {Lille, France}, abstract = {

Les faux souvenirs sont classiquement \étudi\és avec le paradigme DRM (Deese, 1959\ ; Roediger \& McDermott, 1995). Dans ce paradigme, les sujets doivent rappeler et/ou reconna\ître des listes de mots. Les mots des listes sont tous li\és \à un item critique non pr\ésent\é. Les sujets font des faux souvenirs en rappelant et/ou reconnaissant \à tort l\’item critique. Dans beaucoup d\’\études, les personnes \âg\ées font plus de faux souvenirs que les jeunes adultes avec ce paradigme. Afin d\’avoir un paradigme plus \écologique que le paradigme DRM, nous avons utilis\é des inf\érences pr\édictives qui sont des anticipations de la suite possible d\’un texte qu\’on est en train de lire. Par exemple, lorsque nous lisons la phrase \«\ le fragile vase de porcelaine a \ét\é jet\é contre le mur\ \», nous faisons l\’inf\érence pr\édictive que le vase est cass\é m\ême si cela n\’est pas \écrit dans le texte. Apr\ès avoir lu ou entendu les textes, les sujets faisaient des faux souvenirs en rappelant et/ou reconnaissant \à tort les inf\érences pr\édictives comme \étant pr\ésent\ées dans les textes. Les personnes \âg\ées faisaient plus de faux souvenirs que les jeunes adultes lorsque les textes \étaient pr\ésent\és auditivement, mais autant que les jeunes adultes lorsque les textes \étaient pr\ésent\és visuellement. Ainsi, le taux de faux souvenirs chez les personnes \âg\ées d\épend de la modalit\é de pr\ésentation contrairement aux jeunes adultes. M\ême si elles ont parfois des performances moins bonnes que les jeunes adultes, les personnes \âg\ées peuvent avoir des capacit\és mn\ésiques pr\éserv\ées dans des situations proches de la vie quotidienne comme la lecture de textes.

}, author = {Doriane Gras and Tardieu, H. and Piolino, P. and Nicolas, S.} } @conference {997, title = {{\'E}tude de deux verbes copules en khmer : kɨ: et ciɜ entre l{\textquoteright}uniformit{\'e} et la diversit{\'e}}, year = {2010}, month = {25-26/06/2006}, address = {Agay, France}, author = {Thach, Deth and Non, Dara} } @conference {Bonami10h, title = {French portmanteaux as simplex elements}, year = {2010}, month = {February}, address = {Berlin}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Jesse Tseng} } @conference {Bonami10g, title = {How complex is Creole inflectional morphology? The case of Mauritian}, year = {2010}, month = {May}, address = {Budapest}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Fabiola Henri} } @conference {Bonami10c, title = {In how many ways can you be morphomic? Person marking in Laz}, year = {2010}, month = {October}, address = {Coimbra}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Lacroix, Ren{\'e}} } @conference {5310, title = {L{\textquoteright}interpr{\'e}tation temporelle des subordonn{\'e}es relatives en chinois standard}, year = {2010}, month = {07/2010}, address = {Paris : EHESS}, author = {Saillard, Claire} } @conference {Bonami10d, title = {Opaque paradigms, transparent forms: Nepali conjugation}, year = {2010}, month = {June}, address = {Lutherstadt Wittenberg}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Gilles Boy{\'e}} } @conference {Bonami10a, title = {Persian complex predicates: Lexeme formation by itself}, year = {2010}, month = {December}, address = {Toulouse}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Samvelian, Pollet} } @conference {Bonami10f, title = {A Persian lesson on periphrasis, typology and Formal Grammar}, year = {2010}, month = {June}, address = {Guildford}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Samvelian, Pollet} } @conference {Bonami10e, title = {The phrase-structural diversity of periphrasis: A lexicalist account}, year = {2010}, month = {June}, address = {Guildford}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Webelhuth, Gert} } @conference {875, title = {Topicalisation-ATB en chinois mandarin et l{\textquoteright}op{\'e}rateur d{\textquoteright}intersection}, year = {2010}, address = {LCAO, Universit{\'e} Paris 7, 9-10 septembre}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {566, title = {Traitement automatique des cr{\'e}oles haitien et mauricien : {\'e}l{\'e}ments d{\textquoteright}analyse contrastive du lexique et de la s{\'e}mantaxe des marqueurs TMA}, year = {2010}, month = {06/2010}, address = {Orl{\'e}ans}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing and Glaude, Herby} } @conference {4784, title = {Vieillissement normal et faux souvenirs : Etude de l{\textquoteright}effet de modalit{\'e} avec un nouveau paradigme.}, year = {2010}, address = {Li{\`e}ge, Belgique}, abstract = {

Les faux souvenirs sont classiquement \étudi\és avec le paradigme DRM (Deese, 1959\ ; Roediger \& McDermott, 1995). Dans ce paradigme, les sujets doivent rappeler et/ou reconna\ître des listes de mots. Les mots des listes sont tous li\és \à un item critique non pr\ésent\é. Les sujets font des faux souvenirs en rappelant et/ou reconnaissant \à tort l\’item critique. Dans beaucoup d\’\études, les personnes \âg\ées font plus de faux souvenirs que les jeunes adultes avec ce paradigme. Cela pourrait \être d\û au fait qu\’elles ne se servent pas des indices perceptifs pour distinguer les items pr\ésent\és des items critiques non pr\ésent\és. Ainsi, les diff\érences entre sujets jeunes et \âg\és devraient changer en fonction de la modalit\é de pr\ésentation du mat\ériel, la pr\ésentation visuelle fournissant plus d\’indices perceptifs que la pr\ésentation auditive. Afin d\’avoir un paradigme plus \écologique que le paradigme DRM, nous avons utilis\é des inf\érences pr\édictives qui sont des anticipations de la suite possible d\’un texte qu\’on est en train de lire. Par exemple, lorsque nous lisons la phrase \«\ le fragile vase de porcelaine a \ét\é jet\é contre le mur\ \», nous faisons l\’inf\érence pr\édictive que le vase est cass\é m\ême si cela n\’est pas \écrit dans le texte. Apr\ès avoir lu ou entendu les textes, les sujets faisaient des faux souvenirs en reconnaissant \à tort les inf\érences pr\édictives comme \étant pr\ésent\ées dans les textes. Les sujets faisaient moins de faux souvenirs avec la pr\ésentation visuelle qu\’avec la pr\ésentation auditive. Quelle que soit la modalit\é de pr\ésentation des textes, les personnes \âg\ées faisaient plus de faux souvenirs que les jeunes adultes. \ Les personnes \âg\ées, comme les jeunes adultes, b\én\éficient de l\’augmentation des indices perceptifs fournis par la pr\ésentation visuelle pour diminuer les faux souvenirs.

}, author = {Doriane Gras and Tardieu, H. and Piolino, P. and Nicolas, S.} } @conference {896, title = {Wh-ex-situ : Mapping Between Information Structure and Split CP}, year = {2010}, address = {City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {Bonami09b, title = {The diversity of inflectional periphrasis in Persian}, year = {2009}, month = {september}, address = {Paris}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Samvelian, Pollet} } @conference {824, title = {Number neutrality}, year = {2009}, address = {Barcelone}, keywords = {AP, table ronde th{\'e}matique}, author = {Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin} } @conference {898, title = {Optionality of wh-fronting in Chinese: topicalization and ATB cases}, year = {2009}, address = {Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessalonique, Gr{\`e}ce}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {561, title = {Sa mem ha : Pronouncing sa [ha] in Mauritian Creole: a peculiar phenomenon}, year = {2009}, month = {04/2009}, address = {Giessen}, author = {Bartoletti, Corinna and Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {876, title = {On the Syntax and Interpretation of {\textquoteleft}why{\textquoteright}-like {\textquoteleft}what{\textquoteright} in Chinese}, year = {2009}, address = {Paris, France, 13-14 novembre}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {562, title = {TMA markers in Haitian and Mauritian creoles: a comparative study}, year = {2009}, month = {04/2009}, address = {Giessen}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {897, title = {Wh-fronting in Chinese}, year = {2009}, address = {CRLAO, EHESS, Paris, France}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {900, title = {Across-The-Board constructions in mandarin Chinese}, year = {2008}, address = {CRLAO, Ecole des Hauts Etudes en Sciences Sociale, Paris, France}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {Bonami08c, title = {Degrees of Periphrasis in Persian Conjugation}, year = {2008}, month = {December}, address = {Bordeaux}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Samvelian, Pollet} } @conference {Caudal200821-26.July2008, title = {Irrealis and conditional structures: a temporal and/or aspectual issue?}, year = {2008}, pages = {1497-1515}, publisher = {Linguistic Society of Korea}, address = {Korea University, Seoul}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Chris Reintges and Gerhard Schaden} } @conference {Bonami08e, title = {Paradigm shape is morphomic in Nepali}, year = {2008}, month = {February}, address = {Vienna}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Gilles Boy{\'e}} } @conference {Bonami08d, title = {A shifting perspective on the stem space for verbs in French}, year = {2008}, month = {Juin}, address = {Toulouse}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Gilles Boy{\'e}} } @conference {Bonami08f, title = {Sorani Kurdish person markers and the typology of agreement}, year = {2008}, month = {February}, address = {Vienna}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Samvelian, Pollet} } @conference {5096, title = {Spanish Deverbal Noun Implementation in Meaning{\textendash}Text Theory }, year = {2008}, month = {06/2008}, address = {Universit{\'e} d{\textquoteright}Amsterdam}, author = {Oscar Garcia-Marchena} } @conference {877, title = {Special interrogatives in mandarin Chinese}, year = {2008}, address = {Paris, France}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {878, title = {Wh-in-situ et questions rh{\'e}torique en chinois mandarin}, year = {2008}, address = {Paris, France}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {565, title = {Emergence of ena (to have) in Mauritian Creole : a cognitive approach}, year = {2007}, address = {Lille}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {564, title = {Emergence of TMA markers in French Creoles: Is there a creole-specific reanalysis?}, year = {2007}, address = {Amsterdam}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {901, title = {Interpreting the rhetorical wh-questions in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2007}, address = {CRLAO, Ecole des Hauts Etudes en Sciences Sociale, Paris, France}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {569, title = {R{\'e}analyse et grammaticalisation en cr{\'e}ole mauricien : les morph{\`e}mes fin et ena}, year = {2007}, month = {01/2007}, address = {Universit{\'e} Paris 8}, author = {Guillaume Fon Sing} } @conference {5092, title = {Romanian Correlative Coordination {\textendash} A contrastive study}, year = {2007}, month = {11/2007} } @conference {570, title = {Comment dire oui ? Etude didactique et linguistique des marques d{\textquoteright}accord dans le corpus LanCom}, year = {2006}, month = {2008}, pages = {373-380}, edition = {Presses universitaires de Grenoble}, address = {Grenoble}, keywords = {didactique des langues, interaction, pragmatique, s{\'e}mantique}, author = {Delahaie, Juliette} } @conference {5334, title = {Enseigner la prosodie avec le logiciel WinPitch LTL : Possibilit{\'e}s technologiques et p{\'e}dagogiques }, year = {2006}, month = {04/2006}, author = {Ismail Benali and Raphael Chiarelli and Philippe Martin and Hiyon Yoo} } @conference {1049, title = {Licensing hierarchy and Wh-in-situ in mandarin Chinese: pseudo-intervention effects, multiple wh-questions and pseudo-island effects}, year = {2006}, address = {l{\textquoteright}Universit{\'e} de E{\"o}tv{\"o}s Lor{\'a}nd, Budapest, Hongrie.}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {Bonami06b, title = {Subregular defaults in French conjugation}, year = {2006}, address = {Budapest}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Gilles Boy{\'e}} } @conference {Bonami06d, title = {What is realized by realizational morphology?}, year = {2006}, month = {August}, address = {Newcastle}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Gilles Boy{\'e}} } @conference {1048, title = {Wh-topicalization and wh-in-situ in Mandarin Chinese}, year = {2006}, address = {CRLAO, EHESS, Paris, France}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {5203, title = {Discourse-Structure Driven Disambiguation of Underspecified Semantic Representations: a case-study of the Alemannic Perfekt}, year = {2005}, address = {Biarritz}, author = {Patrick Caudal and Gerhard Schaden} } @conference {Abeille05, title = {L{\textquoteright}analyse syntaxique des SN de la forme N${\textquoteright}$}, year = {2005}, month = {January}, address = {Toulouse}, author = {Anne Abeill{\'e} and Olivier Bonami and Godard, Dani{\`e}le and Jesse Tseng} } @conference {5190, title = {Metrical organization, tonal association and focus in French}, year = {2005}, month = {12/2005}, address = {Utrecht, Pays-Bas}, author = {{\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie and Rialland, Annie} } @conference {1050, title = {The semantics of Chinese wh-words, interrogative particles and wh-questions}, year = {2005}, address = {Shanghai, China}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan} } @conference {1051, title = {Wh-in-situ in Mandarin Chinese : an alternative view}, year = {2005}, address = {l{\textquoteright}Universit{\'e} de Leiden, Leiden, Pays bas.}, keywords = {C-COM}, author = {Pan, Victor Junnan and Boucher, Paul} } @conference {Bonami04b, title = {Evaluative adverbs at the syntax-semantics interface}, year = {2004}, address = {Lyon}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Godard, Dani{\`e}le} } @conference {Bonami04c, title = {Stem selection in lexeme formation: evidence from French}, year = {2004}, month = {February}, address = {Vienne}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Gilles Boy{\'e} and Kerleroux, Fran\c coise} } @conference {Bonami03, title = {Incidental adjuncts: an overlooked type of adjunction}, year = {2003}, month = {August}, address = {East Lansing}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Godard, Dani{\`e}le} } @conference {Bonami03c, title = {La construction des paradigmes}, year = {2003}, address = {Toulouse}, author = {Olivier Bonami and Gilles Boy{\'e}} } @conference {5191, title = {Is there phonological constituents at the phrasal level?}, year = {2001}, month = {05/2001}, address = {Manchester}, author = {{\'E}lisabeth Delais-Roussarie} } @conference {5328, title = {WinPitch Language Teaching, Easy Learning (LTEL) }, year = {1998}, month = {12/1998}, author = {Aline Germain and Philippe Martin} }