|Titre||The information-structural status of adjuncts: A QUD-based approach|
|Publication Type||Article de revue|
|Année de publication||2021|
|Authors||Brunetti, Lisa, Kordula De Kuthy, and Arndt Riester|
|Date de publication||13 octobre 2021|
|Type of Article||en ligne : http://journals.openedition.org/discours/11454|
|Mots-clés||annotation, discourse structure, information structure, question under discussion|
In this paper we present an analysis of the information structural properties of different types of verb and sentence modifying adjuncts under a QUD approach. Our study is based on naturalistic data from English, German, and French containing adjuncts such as temporal, spatial, or manner prepositional phrases, as well as different types of adverbial clauses. The analyses relies on Riester et al. (2018)’s approach, which identifies the (generally implicit, sometimes overt) Question Under Discussion preceding each utterance of a text through explicit pragmatic principles, and derives from it the information structure of the utterance. The analysis of adjuncts within this approach shows that in certain contexts, though conveying new information, adjuncts do not answer the QUD that is answered by the sentence they syntactically depend on. We argue that these adjuncts answer a different QUD and behave as independent discourse units. As such, they have an information structure of their own and are in a rhetorical relation with their host clause. Our analysis sheds light on the similarities between adjuncts and Potts (2005)'s supplements: both can be accounted for as independent discourse units; however, while supplements display projective behavior, adjuncts do not. Following Venhuizen et al. (2014), we ascribe this difference to their different semantic anchor (nominal vs verbal). Our work therefore highlights a different way for an expression to be independent at a discourse level, other than being projective content.