LLF – Bât. ODG – 5e étage – Salle du conseil (533)
Céline Pozniak (Paris 8) et Barbara Hemforth (LLF)
The aboutness hypothesis: a new way to explain relative clause processing
Subject and object relative clause processing has been explained by a combination of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic factors. We suggest that many of the phenomena (e.g. general subject preference, effects of animacy, discourse status of relative clause internal subjects) can be explained by a general principle, the Aboutness Hypothesis: a relative clause is most acceptable and easiest to process when everything contributes to making the head its optimal aboutness topic. This principle makes predictions for the role of implicit causality verbs which make subjects or objects good candidates for aboutness topics, a bias that may conflict with the role of the antecedent. In Experiment 1 & 2, we find in acceptability judgments and reading times that object relative clauses with subject-biased verbs are the least acceptable (and more difficult to process). We then show in Experiments 3 & 4 that implicit causality influences relative clause acceptability independent of syntactic factors such as intervention effects as well as semantics factors such as thematic roles. These results confirm the Aboutness Hypothesis as a new way to explain relative clause processing.
Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle – UMR 7110 CNRS et Université Paris Cité – RNSR : 200112497J
Adresse géographique : Bât. Olympe de Gouges, 5ème étage. 8, Rue Albert Einstein 75013 Paris
Envoyer un courrier : Case Postale 7031 – 5, rue Thomas Mann – F-75205 Paris Cedex 13
Transports : Métro ligne 14 : arrêt "Bibliothèque François Mitterrand" – Tram T3A : arrêt "Avenue de France" – Bus n°89 et 62 : arrêt "Porte de France"
Téléphone : (+33) (0)1 57 27 57 64 – Télécopie : (+33) (0)1 57 27 57 81
Directeur de la publication : Heather Burnett – Dernière mise à jour : 2026-02-03